Advertisement

Man, Woman, “Other”: Factors Associated with Nonbinary Gender Identification

  • Stephen Whyte
  • Robert C. Brooks
  • Benno Torgler
Original Paper

Abstract

Using a unique dataset of 7479 respondents to the online Australian Sex Survey (July–September 2016), we explored factors relevant for individuals who self-identify as one of the many possible nonbinary gender options (i.e., not man or woman). Our results identified significant sex differences in such factors; in particular, a positive association between female height, higher educational levels, and greater same-sex attraction (female–female) versus a negative effect of lower income levels and more offspring. With respect to sex similarities, older males and females, heterosexuals, those with lower educational levels, and those living outside capital cities were all more likely to identify as the historically dichotomous gender options. These factors associated with nonbinary gender identification were also more multifaceted for females than for males, although our interaction terms demonstrated that younger females (relative to younger males) and nonheterosexuals (relative to heterosexuals) were more likely to identify as nonbinary. These effects were reversed, however, in the older cohort. Because gender can have such significant lifetime impacts for both the individual and society as a whole, our findings strongly suggest the need for further research into factors that impact gender diversity.

Keywords

Nonbinary gender Gender diversity Sex Gender identity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank James Templeman for all his assistance with this research project; without whom this study would not have been possible. We would also like to thank Ho Fai Chan, Sara Casey, and Yarrow Andrew for helpful comments and feedback. Stephen Whyte acknowledges funding support from an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. The authors would also like to recognize and thank Lifeline for its valued role in supporting Australian human behavioral research. The authors declare no conflict of interest (material or financial) that relates to the research described in this article. All researches were conducted in accordance with the institution’s (Queensland University of Technology) Human Research Ethics Clearance (No. 1600000221).

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Sex and gender diversity in the 2016 census, census of population and housing: Reflecting Australia—Stories from the census, 2016. Released 2017. Retrieved March 16, 2017, from http://abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2071.0~2016~Main%20Features~Sex%20and%20Gender%20Diversity%20in%20the%202016%20Census~90.
  2. Blackless, M., Charuvastra, A., Derryck, A., Fausto-Sterling, A., Lauzanne, K., & Lee, E. (2000). How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection: Opposites are sometimes said to attract, but in fact we are likely to marry someone who is similar to us in almost every variable. American Scientist, 73, 47–51.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Carrera, M. V., DePalma, R., & Lameiras, M. (2012). Sex/gender identity: Moving beyond fixed and ‘natural’categories. Sexualities, 15, 995–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, R. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 1675–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1385–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, S. (2016). Gender inequality: Nonbinary transgender people in the workplace. Cogent Social Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1236511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Factor, R. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (2008). A study of transgender adults and their non-transgender siblings on demographic characteristics, social support, and experiences of violence. Journal of LGBT Health Research, 3, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleming, P. J., & Agnew-Brune, C. (2015). Current trends in the study of gender norms and health behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, J., Grant, J., & Herman, J. L. (2012). A gender not listed here: Genderqueers, gender rebels, and otherwise in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. LGBTQ Public Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School, 2(1). Retrieved March 16, 2017, from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zj46213.
  14. Hoffman, R. M., Borders, L. D., & Hattie, J. A. (2000). Reconceptualizing femininity and masculinity: From gender roles to gender self-confidence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 475–503.Google Scholar
  15. Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist.  https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobson, R., & Joel, D. (2018). An exploration of the relations between self-reported gender identity and sexual orientation in an online sample of cisgender individuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1239-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Joel, D., Tarrasch, R., Berman, Z., Mukamel, M., & Ziv, E. (2014). Queering gender: Studying gender identity in “normative” individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, T., Smith, E., Ward, R., Dixon, J., Hillier, L., & Mitchell, A. (2016). School experiences of transgender and gender diverse students in Australia. Sex Education, 16, 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuyper, L., & Wijsen, C. (2014). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mallenbaum, C. (2016). Tinder update introduces 37 new gender identity options. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved March 16, 2017, from http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/tinder-update-has-introduced-new-gender-identity-options-20161116-gsr710.html.
  22. McNeil, J., Bailey, L., Ellis, S., Morton, J., & Regan, M. (2012). Trans Mental Health Study 2012. Edinburgh: Scottish Transgender Alliance.Google Scholar
  23. Mealey, L. (2000). Sex differences: Developmental and evolutionary strategies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Morley, B., Pirkis, J., Naccarella, L., Kohn, F., Blashki, G., & Burgess, P. (2007). Improving access to and outcomes from mental health care in rural Australia. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 15(5), 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. New York City Commission on Human Rights. (2016). Legal enforcement guidance on the discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression: Local Law No. 3 (2002); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8–102(23) Retrieved March 16, 2017, from http://www1.nyc.gov/site/cchr/law/legal-guidances-gender-identity-expression.page.
  26. Rankin, S., & Beemyn, G. (2012). Beyond a binary: The lives of gender-nonconforming youth. About Campus, 17(4), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richards, C., Bouman, W. P., Seal, L., Barker, M. J., Nieder, T. O., & T’Sjoen, G. (2016). Nonbinary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richters, J., Altman, D., Badcock, P. B., Smith, A. M., de Visser, R. O., Grulich, A. E., … Simpson, J. M. (2014). Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience: The Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sexual Health, 11(5), 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richters, J., Grulich, A. E., Visser, R. O., Smith, A., & Rissel, C. E. (2003). Sex in Australia: Sexual difficulties in a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Riggs, D. W., von Doussa, H., & Power, J. (2015). The family and romantic relationships of trans and gender diverse Australians: An exploratory survey. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30(2), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women. Notes on the “Political economy of sex”. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rushbrook, D. (2002). Cities, queer space, and the cosmopolitan tourist. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 8(1), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The big five related to risky sexual behavior across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smiler, A. P. (2004). Thirty years after the discovery of gender: Psychological concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50(1–2), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoller, R. J. (1968). Sex and gender: The development of masculinity and femininity (Vol. 1). New York: Science House.Google Scholar
  36. Van Caenegem, E., Wierckx, K., Elaut, E., Buysse, A., Dewaele, A., Van Nieuwerburgh, F., … T’Sjoen, G. (2015). Prevalence of gender nonconformity in Flanders, Belgium. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1281–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2013). What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wellings, K., Collumbien, M., Slaymaker, E., Singh, S., Hodges, Z., Patel, D., et al. (2006). Sexual behavior in context: A global perspective. Lancet, 368(9548), 1706–1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2017). Preference versus choice in online dating. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whyte, S., Torgler, B., & Harrison, K. L. (2016). What women want in their sperm donor: A study of more than 1,000 women’s sperm donor selections. Economics & Human Biology, 23, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilchins, R. A. (2004). Time for gender rights. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 10(2), 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization. (2016). Gender, women and health. “What do we mean by sex and gender?” Retrieved March 16, 2017, from http://apps.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Whyte
    • 1
  • Robert C. Brooks
    • 2
  • Benno Torgler
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Economics and FinanceQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Center for Research in Economics, Management, and the ArtsZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations