Nasality in Homosexual Men: A Comparison with Heterosexual Men and Women
Several studies reported that pitch and articulation may vary according to a person’s sexual orientation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether homosexual males also demonstrate differences in nasal resonance compared to heterosexual males. Speech samples of 30 self-identified homosexual males, 35 heterosexual males, and 34 heterosexual females were compared both instrumentally and perceptually. Nasalance scores were calculated for the sounds /a/, /i/, /u/, and /m/ and for an oronasal, oral, and nasal text. In addition, the Nasality Severity Index was determined. Spontaneous speech samples were used for a perceptual evaluation of nasal resonance. Neither the nasalance scores nor the Nasality Severity Index were significantly different between the homosexual and heterosexual males. Heterosexual females, on the other hand, showed significantly higher nasalance values for the oronasal and oral text and a significantly lower Nasality Severity Index than both the homosexual and the heterosexual males. The perceptual judgment revealed no significant differences between the three groups. The results of this study suggest that, in contrast to pitch and articulation, nasality does not tend to vary with sexual orientation.
KeywordsSexual orientation Nasality Homosexual Speech
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Commission for Medical Ethics of the Ghent University Hospital (project number: EC/2015/1226). All participants signed an informed consent form.
- Bettens, K., Wuyts, F. L., D’haeseleer, E., Luyten, A., Meerschman, I., Van Crayelynghe, C., & Van Lierde, K. M. (2016b). Short-term and long-term test–retest reliability of the Nasality Severity Index 2.0. Journal of Communication Disorders, 62, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.21) [Computersoftware]. http://www.praat.org/. Accessed 30 Sept 2015.
- Bowen, C. (2002). Beyond lisping: Code switching and gay speech styles. http://www.speech-language-therapy.com/codemix.htm. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
- Crist, S. (1997). Duration of onset consonants in gay male stereotyped speech. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 53–70.Google Scholar
- Curry, T. (2013, January 10, Updated 2017, December 6). Re: The strength in being a feminine gay man [Web log message]. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/tyler-curry/the-strength-in-being-a-feminine-gay-man_b_3896302.html.
- Fairbanks, G. (1960). Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, S. G., & Bishop, M. E. (1970). Measurement of nasality with tonar. Cleft Palate Journal, 10, 610–621.Google Scholar
- Gerther, H., Thorpe, D. (Producer) & Thorpe, D. (Producer and Director) (2014). Do I sound gay? [Motion picture]. United States: IFC Films.Google Scholar
- Hardin, M. A., Van Demark, D. R., Morris, H. L., & Payne, M. M. (1992). Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 29, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0346_cbnsal_2.3.co_2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, J. (2005). Ook kinderen hebben een lichaam: Kinderen leren omgaan met seksualiteit [Also children have a body. Learning children how to deal with sexuality]. Tielt, Belgium: Uitgeverij Lannoo.Google Scholar
- Mack, S. (2010). Perception and identity: Stereotypes of speech and sexual orientation in Puerto Rican Spanish. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 136–147). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
- Munson, B., Crocker, L., Pierrehumbert, J. B., Owen-Anderson, A., & Zucker, K. J. (2015). Gender typicality in children’s speech: A comparison of boys with and without gender identity disorder. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137, 1995–2003. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4916202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rochet, A. P., Rochet, B. L., Sovis, E. A., & Mielke, D. L. (1998). Characteristics of nasalance in speakers of Western Canadian English and French. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 22, 94–103.Google Scholar
- Rogers, H., & Smyth, R. (2003, August). Phonetic differences between gay- and straight-sounding male speakers of North American English. Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
- Sweeney, T., & Sell, D. (2008). Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43, 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701438177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tracy, E. C., Bainter, S. A., & Satariano, N. P. (2015). Judgments of self-identified gay and heterosexual male speakers: Which phonemes are most salient in determining sexual orientation? Journal of Phonetics, 52, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Van de Weijer, J. C., & Slis, I. H. (1991). Nasaliteitsmetingen met de nasometer [Measuring nasality with the nasometer]. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 63, 97–101.Google Scholar