Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 867–880 | Cite as

Approach and Avoidance Biases Toward Sexual Stimuli and Their Association with the Dual Control Model of Sexual Response in Heterosexual Men

  • Daniel TurnerEmail author
  • Charlotte E. Wittekind
  • Peer Briken
  • Peter Fromberger
  • Steffen Moritz
  • Martin Rettenberger
Original Paper
  • 169 Downloads

Abstract

Many models of human behavior work in an interaction of a dual system. While one system usually represents controlled and reflective behavioral responses, the other system reflects automatic and impulsive actions. In the impulsive system, positive stimuli initiate approach reactions and negative cues avoidance reactions. Besides stimulus valence, the behavioral response triggered by the impulsive system is influenced by personality (e.g., the propensity to react with approach or avoidance biases in a specific situation). The present study applied a computerized Approach–Avoidance Task (AAT; Rinck & Becker, 2007) to assess automatic behavioral approach and avoidance biases toward sexual and neutral stimuli in heterosexual men (N = 40). Individual AAT-performance was furthermore related to sexual excitation (SES) and the two sexual inhibition factors (SIS1 and SIS2) as proposed by the Dual Control Model of sexual response (Bancroft & Janssen, 2000). Against our hypotheses, participants did not show a stronger approach bias toward sexually preferred (i.e., images of women) than sexually not preferred stimuli (i.e., images of men or children). However, stronger approach biases toward images of women were positively associated with sexual excitation and negatively correlated with sexual inhibition due to a threat of performance failure (SIS1) even after controlling for potential confounds (i.e., general behavioral activation and inhibition). The results support the importance of the influence of dispositional traits measured with the Dual Control Model of sexual response on approach and avoidance biases toward sexually preferred stimuli in heterosexual men.

Keywords

Sexual behavior Sexual excitation Sexual inhibition Approach–Avoidance Task Dual Control Model 

References

  1. Abbey, A., Saenz, C., & Buck, P. O. (2005). The cumulative effects of acute alcohol consumption, individual differences and situational perceptions on sexual decision making. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 82–90.  https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J., Graham, C., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 121–142.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902747222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J., Herbenick, D., Barnes, T., Hallam-Jones, R., Wylie, K., & Janssen, E. (2005). The relevance of the dual control model to male sexual dysfunction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 13–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990512331298275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 571–579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00024-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Carnes, L., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long, J. S. (2003). Sexual risk-taking in gay men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 555–572.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026041628364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkman, E. T., Lieberman, M. D., & Gable, S. L. (2009). BIS, BAS, and response conflict: Testing predictions of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 586–591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brickenkamp, R., Schmidt-Atzert, L., & Liepmann, D. (2010). d2-R: Test d2-revision. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  10. Brom, M., Laan, E., Everaerd, W., Spinhoven, P., & Both, S. (2014). Extinction and renewal of conditioned sexual responses. PLoS ONE, 9, e105955.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105955.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Brom, M., Laan, E., Everaerd, W., Spinhoven, P., & Both, S. (2015a). Extinction of aversive classically conditioned human sexual response. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 916–935.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brom, M., Laan, E., Everaerd, W., Spinhoven, P., Cousijn, J., & Both, S. (2015b). The influence of emotion down-regulation on the expectation of sexual reward. Behavior Therapy, 46, 379–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter, D., Janssen, E., Graham, C., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2008). Women’s scores on the sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 36–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701808076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carpenter, D. L., Janssen, E., Graham, C. A., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2011). The sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales-short form SIS/SES-SF. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 236–239). Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charnigo, R., Noar, S. M., Garnett, C., Crosby, R., Palmgreen, P., & Zimmerman, R. S. (2013). Sensation seeking and impulsivity: Combined associations with risky sexual behavior in a large sample of young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 480–488.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.652264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Cousijn, J., Goudrian, A. E., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Reaching out towards cannabis: Approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction, 106, 1667–1674.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03475.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. de Albuquerque Camarao, B. (2012). The sexual inhibition and sexual excitation scalesShort form (SIS/SES-SF): A validation study of the German version. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  22. De Houwer, J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Elliot, A. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  24. Enter, D., Colzato, L. S., & Roelofs, K. (2012). Dopamine transporter polymorphisms affect social approach-avoidance tendencies. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 11, 671–676.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00791.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Enter, D., Spinhoven, P., & Roelofs, K. (2014). Alleviating social avoidance: Effects of single dose testosterone administration on approach-avoidance action. Hormones and Behavior, 65, 351–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ernst, L. H., Weidner, A., Ehlis, A.-C., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2012). Controlled attention allocation mediates the relation between goal-oriented pursuit and approach-avoidance reactions to negative stimuli. Biological Psychology, 91, 312–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Field, M., Caren, R., Fernie, G., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: Comparison of effects in a relevant stimulus-response compatibility task and an approach/avoidance Simon task. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 697–701.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397–419.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X241540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fromberger, P., Jordan, K., Steinkrauss, H., von Herder, J., Witzel, J., Stolpmann, G., … Müller, J. L. (2012a). Diagnostic accuracy of eye movements in assessing pedophilia. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1868–1882.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02754.x.
  31. Fromberger, P., Jordan, K., von Herder, J., Steinkrauss, H., Nemetschek, R., Stolpmann, G., & Müller, J. L. (2012b). Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 919–928.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9816-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gräfe, K., Zipfel, S., Herzog, W., & Löwe, B. (2004). Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem “Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)”. Diagnostica, 50, 171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray, J. A. (1972). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion: A modification of Eysenck’s theory. In V. D. Nebylitsyn & J. A. Gray (Eds.), The biological bases of individual behavior (pp. 182–205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ha, T., van den Berg, J. E. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2012). Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 673–682.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9855-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamilton, L. D., & Meston, C. M. (2011). The role of salivary cortisol and DHEA-S in response to sexual, humorous, and anxiety-inducing stimuli. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 765–771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harden, K. P. (2014). Genetic influences on adolescent sexual behavior: Why genes matter for environmentally oriented researchers. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 434–465.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heuer, K., Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: The Approach-Avoidance Task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2990–3001.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2002). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  40. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Gschwendner, T. (2009a). Men on the “pull”: Automatic approach-avoidance tendencies and sexual interest behavior. Social Psychology, 40, 73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009b). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 4, 162–176.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Friese, M., Wiers, R. W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962–977.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J. (2007). The dual control model: The role of sexual inhibition & excitation in sexual arousal and behavior. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 197–222). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Janssen, E., Goodrich, D., Petrocelli, J. V., & Bancroft, J. (2009). Psychophysiological response patterns and risky sexual behavior in heterosexual and homosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 538–550.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9432-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002a). The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002b). The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
  49. Kobeleva, X., Seidel, E.-M., Kohler, C., Schneider, F., Habel, U., & Derntl, B. (2014). Dissociation of explicit and implicit measures of the behavioral inhibition and activation system in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 218, 134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kotynski, A. E., & Demaree, H. A. (2017). A study named desire: Local focus increases approach motivation for desserts. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 455–464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9622-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Koukounas, E., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Sexual and emotional variables influencing sexual response to erotica: A psychophysiological investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 393–408.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010261315767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
  53. Lange, W.-G., Keijsers, G., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2008). Social anxiety and evaluation of social crowds: Explicit and implicit measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 932–943.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lehrl, S. (2005). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest. Balingen: Spitta Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Macapagal, K. R., Janssen, E., Fridberg, D. J., Finn, P. R., & Heiman, J. R. (2011). The effects of impulsivity, sexual arousability, and abstract intellectual ability on men’s and women’s Go/No-Go task performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 995–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9676-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. May, C. N., Juergensen, J., & Demaree, H. A. (2016). Yum, cake! How reward sensitivity relates to automatic approach motivation for dessert food images. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 265–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitchell, W. B., Dibartolo, P. M., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Effects of positive and negative mood on sexual arousal in sexually functional males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 197–207.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018686631428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39–48.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation. (2004). Not real people set. Victoria, BC: Author.Google Scholar
  62. Payne, B. K., & Gawronski, B. (2010). A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going? In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Phaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 378.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Pinxten, W., & Lievens, J. (2015). An exploratory study of factors associated with sexual inhibition and excitation: findings from a representative survey in Flanders. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 679–689.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.882889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reddy, L. F., Green, M. F., Wynn, J. K., Rinck, M., & Horan, W. P. (2016). Approaching anger in schizophrenia: What an implicit task tells you that self-report does not. Schizophrenia Research, 176, 514–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.05.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rettenberger, M., Klein, V., & Briken, P. (2016). The relationship between hypersexual behavior, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, and personality traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 219–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0399-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 105–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roefs, A., Huijding, J., Smulders, F. T. Y., MacLeod, C. M., de Jong, P. J., Wiers, R. W., & Jansen, A. T. M. (2011). Implicit measures of association in psychopathology research. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 149–193.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Roelofs, K., Putman, P., Schouten, S., Lange, W.-G., Volman, I., & Rinck, M. (2010). Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 290–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seibt, B., Häfner, M., & Deutsch, R. (2007). Prepared to eat: How immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 359–379.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Simons, J. S., Maisto, S. A., Wray, T. B., & Emery, N. N. (2015). Acute effects of intoxication and arousal on approach/avoidance biases toward sexual risk stimuli in heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0477-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Skakoon-Sparling, S., Cramer, K. M., & Shuper, P. A. (2016). The impact of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking and decision-making in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 33–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10408-015-0589-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Snagowski, J., & Brand, M. (2014). Symptoms of cybersex addiction can be linked to both approach and avoiding pornographic stimuli: Results from an analog sample of regular cybersex users. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 653.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. W. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report versin of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 18, 1737–1744.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stahl, C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., Nuszbaum, M., Tüscher, O., Lieb, K., & Klauer, K. C. (2014). Behavioral components of impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 850–886.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2015). The duality of everyday life: Dual-process and dual-system models in social psychology. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 891–927). Attitudes and social cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  81. Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S., & Brocke, B. (2001). A German version of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales [Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragenbogens von Carver und White]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216–227.  https://doi.org/10.1024/0170-1789.22.3.216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Struijs, S. Y., Lamers, F., Vroling, M. S., Roelofs, K., Spinhoven, P., & Phennix, B. W. J. H. (2017). Approach and avoidance tendencies in depression and anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 256, 475–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tanner, J. M. (1973). Growing up. Scientific American, 229, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Townsend, J. M., & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partner’s physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 149–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Turner, D., Briken, P., Klein, V., & Rettenberger, M. (2014). SIS/SES-SF [Sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales-short form (German version)]. In D. Richter, E. Brähler, & B. Strauß (Eds.), Diagnostische Verfahren in der Sexualwissenschaft (pp. 114–126). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  86. Turner, D., Laier, C., Brand, M., Bockshammer, T., Welsch, R., & Rettenberger, M. (2018). Response inhibition and impulsive decision-making in sexual offenders against children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127, 471–481.  https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Velten, J., Scholten, S., & Margraf, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women and Men (SESII-WM) and the Sexual Excitation Scales/Sexual Inhibition Scales short form (SIS/SES-SF) in a population-based sample in Germany. PLoS One, 13(3), e0193080.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193080.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. von Borries, A. K. L., Volman, I., de Bruijn, E. R. A., Bulten, B. H., Verkes, R. J., & Roelofs, K. (2012). Psychopaths lack the automatic avoidance of social threat: relation to instrumental aggression. Psychiatry Research, 200, 761–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wallen, K. (2001). Sex and context: Hormones and primate sexual motivation. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 339–357.  https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2001.1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wiers, C. E., Kühn, S., Javadi, A. H., Korucuoglu, O., Wiers, R. W., Walter, H., … Bermpohl, F. (2013). Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 229, 187–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3098-5.
  91. Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Dictus, M., & Van Den Wildenberg, E. (2009). Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 8, 101–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00454.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Kordts, R., Houben, K., & Strack, F. (2010). Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach. Addiction, 105, 279–287.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02775.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wittekind, C. E., Behmer, F., Muhtz, C., Fritzsche, A., Moritz, S., & Jelinek, L. (2015). Investigation of automatic avoidance in displaced individuals with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Psychiatry Research, 228, 887–893.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wittorf, A., Wiedemann, G., & Klingberg, S. (2014). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest MWT bei Schizophrenie: Valides Maß der prämorbiden Intelligenz? [Multiple-choice vocabulary intelligence test MWT in schizophrenia: Valid measure of premorbid intelligence?]. Psychiatrische Praxis, 41, 95–100.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Sex Research and Forensic PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of PsychologyLMUMunichGermany
  4. 4.Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  5. 5.Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Forensic PsychiatryHuman Medical Center Georg-August University GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  6. 6.Centre for Criminology (Kriminologische Zentralstelle – KrimZ)WiesbadenGermany
  7. 7.Department of PsychologyJohannes Gutenberg-University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations