How Do College Experience and Gender Differentiate the Enactment of Hookup Scripts Among Emerging Adults?
Empirical attention to “hooking up” has expanded over time, yet limited attention has been devoted to understanding the hookup experiences of emerging adults (ages 18–25) who have not attended college and how they may differ from those who have attended college. Guided by life course and scripting theories, we used a storytelling methodology to content analyze the hookup stories of a large sample of college-attending and non-college emerging adults (N = 407). We also compared stories based on gender, as several studies report gender differences but have yet to consider how hookup scripts may differ between men and women. Overall, we found that college-attending and non-college emerging adults reported using similar hookup scripts in their most recent hookup experience, as did emerging adult men and women. However, we found that greater proportions of non-college emerging adults reported sexual touch, meeting in an “other location,” and positive reactions to their most recent hookup. Greater proportions of college-attending emerging adults reported their hookup occurred in a house/apartment. In terms of gender, greater proportions of women reported “having sex” and deep kissing, hooking up with an acquaintance, partner characteristics as a reason to hookup, and negative reactions to their most recent hookup. Greater proportions of men reported hooking up with a stranger, meeting at a bar/club, hooking up at a party, and hooking up at an “other location.” Implications for future research and sexual health education and intervention are discussed.
KeywordsHooking up Casual sex Emerging adulthood College student Non-college emerging adults
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Arnett, J. J. (2006). Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Bailey, J. A., Fleming, C. B., Henson, J. N., Catalano, R. F., & Haggerty, K. P. (2008). Sexual risk behavior 6 months post-high school: Associations with college attendance, living with parents, and prior risk behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.11.138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bengston, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 469–498). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Burr, W. R., Leigh, G. K., Day, R. D., & Constantine, J. (1979). Symbolic interaction and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 42–111)., Free Press NY: New York.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., & Stine, E. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Demographics of mechanical turk. Center for Digital Economy Research Working Papers, 10. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2451/29585.
- Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Moffitt, K. H., & Singer, J. A. (1994). Continuity in the life story: Self-defining memories, affect, and approach/avoidance personal strivings. Journal of Personality, 62, 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00793.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60.Google Scholar
- White, J. M., Klein, D. M., & Martin, T. F. (2015). Family theories (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar