Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 1633–1647 | Cite as

Identification of Nonconsensual Sexual Experiences and the Sexual Self-Schemas of Women: Implications for Sexual Functioning

  • Chelsea D. Kilimnik
  • Ryan L. Boyd
  • Amelia M. Stanton
  • Cindy M. Meston
Original Paper

Abstract

Many individuals who experience nonconsensual sexual experiences (NSEs) do not identify their experiences with common sexual violence labels (e.g., sexual assault, rape, or abuse), and cognitive mechanisms of identification have yet to be examined. Identification may involve the integration of the experience into sexual self-schemas, which would have implications for sexual well-being. Women were recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (N = 818) to take part in an anonymous online study of sexual experiences. The current study assessed the relationship between textually derived sexual self-schemas and sexual function (measured by the Female Sexual Function Index) in women (M = 35.37 years, SD = 11.27) with NSEs who both did (identifiers, n = 305) and did not (non-identifiers, n = 176) identify with common sexual violence labels, in comparison with those with no NSEs (n = 337). Text analyses revealed nine sexual self-schema themes in participants’ essays: Virginity, Openness, Erotophilia, NSEs, Romantic, Sexual Activity, Warmth, Relationships, and Reflection. Analyses demonstrated that identifiers reported significantly poorer sexual functioning and less use of both the Warmth and Openness themes than those with no NSEs. Identifiers also invoked the NSE theme more frequently than both those with no NSE histories and non-identifiers. While greater prominence of the Warmth theme was predictive of greater sexual functioning for both non-identifiers and those with no NSEs, this was not true for identifiers. Instead, the NSE theme was significantly predictive of lower sexual functioning in identifiers. The results suggest that NSE identification may result in greater internalization of the NSE into one’s sexual self-schema and, in turn, predict decrements in sexual functioning. The results are discussed in relation to identification interpretation and clinical intervention.

Keywords

Rape Sexual assault Sexual abuse Sexual self-schemas Sexual functioning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference Number: 152269, awarded to Chelsea Kilimnik in May 2017).

Supplementary material

10508_2018_1229_MOESM1_ESM.docx (118 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 118 kb)

References

  1. Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botta, R. A., & Pingree, S. (1997). Interpersonal communication and rape: Women acknowledge their assaults. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 197–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/108107397127752.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, R. L. (2017). MEH: Meaning extraction helper (Version 1.4.15) [Software]. Retrieved from http://meh.ryanb.cc/. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.
  4. Boyd, R. L., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2015). A way with words: Using language for psychological science in the modern era. In C. Dimofte, C. Haugtvedt, & R. Yalch (Eds.), Consumer psychology in a social media world (pp. 222–236). New York: Routledge Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, R. L., Wilson, S. R., Pennebaker, J. W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., & Mihalcea, R. (2015, April). Values in words: Using language to evaluate and understand personal values. In International association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 31–40). Retrieved from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10482.
  6. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high quality data? Perspectives on Psychology Science, 6, 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Bruce, C., & Thomas, G. (2015). Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/uploadedFiles/AAU_Publications/AAU_Reports/Sexual_Assault_Campus_Survey/Report%20on%20the%20AAU%20Campus%20Climate%20Survey%20on%20Sexual%20Assault%20and%20Sexual%20Misconduct.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  8. Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. H. (2008). Revealing dimensions of thinking in open–ended self-descriptions: An automated meaning extraction method for natural language. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 96–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleere, C., & Lynn, S. J. (2013). Acknowledged versus unacknowledged sexual assault among college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2593–2611.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513479033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1979). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 5, 244–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926237908403732.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Harned, M. S. (2004). Does it matter what you call it? The relationship between labeling unwanted sexual experiences and distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1090–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1090.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Holguin, G., & Hansen, D. J. (2003). The “sexual abused child”: Potential mechanisms of adverse influences of such a label. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 645–670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00101-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 233–242.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katerdahl, D., Burge, S., & Kellogg, N. (2006). Factors that predict how women label their own childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 15, 43–54.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v15n02_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelley, E. L., & Gidycz, C. A. (2015). Labeling of sexual assault and its relationship with sexual functioning: The mediating role of coping. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 348–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514534777.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilimnik, C. D., Trapnell, P. D., & Humphreys, T. P. (2016). Negative affectivity in female’s identification of their nonconsensual sexual experiences and sexual dissatisfaction. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25, 177–185.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.253-A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 124–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonard, L. M., & Follette, V. M. (2002). Sexual functioning in women reporting a history of child sexual abuse. Review of the empirical literature and clinical implications. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 346–388.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2002.10559809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Littleton, H. L., Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. (2007). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden rape victim? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 14, 57–74.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v14n04_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marx, B., & Soler-Baillo, J. (2005). The relationships among risk recognition, autonomic and self-reported arousal, and posttraumatic stress symptomatology in acknowledged and unacknowledged victims of sexual assault. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 618–624.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000171809.12117.79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Meston, C. M., Lorenz, T. A., & Stephenson, K. R. (2013). Effects of expressive writing on sexual dysfunction, depression, and PTSD in women with a history of childhood sexual abuse: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 2177–2189.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Meston, C. M., Rellini, A. H., & Heiman, J. R. (2006). Women’s history of sexual abuse, their sexuality, and sexual self-schemas. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & Dolezal, C. (2007). The Female Sexual Function Index: A methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 217–224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230701267852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Niehaus, A. F., Jackson, J., & Davies, S. (2010). Sexual self-schemas of female child sexual abuse survivors: Relationships with risky sexual behavior and sexual assault in adolescence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1359–1374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9600-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2011). A match-and-motivation model of how women label their nonconsensual sexual experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 558–570.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311410210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pulverman, C. S., Boyd, R. L., Stanton, A. M., & Meston, C. M. (2017). Changes in the sexual self-schema of women with a history of childhood sexual abuse following expressive writing treatment. Psychological Trauma, 9, 181–188.  https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rellini, A., & Meston, C. (2007). Sexual function and satisfaction in adults based on the definition of child sexual abuse. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 1312–1321.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00573.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rellini, A. H., & Meston, C. M. (2011). Sexual self-schemas, sexual dysfunction, and the sexual responses of women with a history of childhood sexual abuse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 351–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9694-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodríguez-Auarez, G., Ramirez-Ezparza, N., Pérez-Brena, N., & Boyd, R. L. (2017). Hablos Inglés y Español: Cultural self-schemas as a function of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 30, 885.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597
  32. Stanton, A. M., Boyd, R. L., Pulverman, C., & Meston, C. M. (2015). Determining women’s sexual self-schemas through advanced computerized text analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 46, 78–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilcox, R. R. (2010). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations