Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 47, Issue 7, pp 2051–2059 | Cite as

Evaluation of HIV Disclosure Behavior Following a Randomized Controlled Disclosure Intervention for Men Who Have Sex with Men Living with HIV

  • Julianne M. Serovich
  • Tanja C. Laschober
  • Monique J. Brown
  • Judy A. Kimberly
Original Paper

Abstract

Preventing the transmission of HIV, especially among high-risk populations, is a U.S. public health priority. Interventions aimed at easing the burden of HIV disclosure to casual sexual partners among men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV are essential in this endeavor. This randomized controlled study evaluated differences in disclosure behavior between a disclosure intervention (DI) and attention control case management (ACCM) group for MSM living with HIV (N = 315) and determinants (self-efficacy, outcome expectancy) of disclosure. Mixed-effects models results showed no significant differences in disclosure behavior between the DI and ACCM groups. Further, disclosure behavior changed in a curvilinear manner over 12 months and benefited from a booster session. Both disclosure self-efficacy and outcome expectancy predicted disclosure behavior. Interventions targeting HIV disclosure among MSM living with HIV should focus on improving perceptions of disclosure self-efficacy and outcome expectancy and include a booster session to facilitate HIV disclosure.

Keywords

RCT and HIV HIV disclosure MSM Sexual orientation 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082639) awarded to the first author.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bird, J. D. P., Fingerhut, D. D., & McKirnan, D. J. (2011). Ethnic differences in HIV-disclosure and sexual risk. AIDS Care, 23, 444–448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird, J. D. P., & Voisin, D. R. (2010). A conceptual model of HIV disclosure in casual sexual encounters among men who have sex with men. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 365–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2015). Comprehensive risk counseling and services (CRCS). Available at https://effectiveinterventions.cdc.gov/en/highimpactprevention/publichealthstrategies/CRCS.asp.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016a). HIV among gay and bisexual men. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/cdc-msm-508.pdf.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016b). The nation’s approach to HIV prevention for gay and bisexual men. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/approach-to-hiv-prevention-508.pdf.
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2017a). Start talking. Stop HIV. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/actagainstaids/campaigns/starttalking/.
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2017b). HIV-specific criminal laws. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/states/exposure.html.
  9. Chiasson, M. A., Shaw, F. S., Humberstone, M., Hirshfield, S., & Hartel, D. (2009). Increased HIV disclosure three months after an online video intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Care, 21, 1081–1089.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Conserve, D. F., Groves, A. K., & Maman, S. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions promoting HIV serostatus disclosure to sexual partners: A systematic review. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 1763–1772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Des Jarlais, D. C., Paone, D., Milliken, J., Turner, C. F., Miller, H., Gribble, J., et al. (1999). Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomized trial. Lancet, 535(9165), 1657–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emlet, C. A. (2006). A comparison of HIV stigma and disclosure patterns between older and younger adults living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 20, 350–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gearing, R. E., Schwalbe, C. S., Lee, R. H., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2013). The effectiveness of booster sessions in CBT treatment for child and adolescent mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 30, 800–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirshfield, S., Chiasson, M. A., Joseph, H., Scheinmann, R., Johnson, W. D., Remien, R. H., et al. (2012). An online randomized controlled trial evaluating HIV prevention digital media interventions for men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE, 7, e46252. Available at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0046252.
  15. Johnson, W. D., Holtgrave, D. R., McClellan, W. M., Flanders, W. D., Hill, A. N., & Goodman, M. (2005). HIV intervention research for men who have sex with men: A 7-year update. AIDS Education and Prevention, 17, 568–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly, C. A., Hewett, P. C., Mensch, B. S., Rankin, J. C., Nsobya, S. L., Kalibala, S., et al. (2014). Using biomarkers to assess the validity of sexual behavior reporting across interview modes among young women in Kampala, Uganda. Studies in Family Planning, 45, 43–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McAlister, A. L., Perry, C. L., & Parcel, G. S. (2008). How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact. Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 169–188). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. O’Connell, A. A., Reed, S. J., & Serovich, J. M. (2015). The efficacy of serostatus disclosure for HIV transmission risk reduction. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 283–290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP]. (2015). National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States: Updated to 2020. Available at https://www.aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/nhas-update.pdf.
  21. Perlis, T. E., Des Jarlais, D. C., Friedman, S. R., Arasteh, K., & Turner, C. F. (2004). Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction, 99, 885–896.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosser, B. R. S., Horvath, K. J., Hatfield, L. A., Peterson, J. L., Jacoby, S., Stately, A., et al. (2008). Predictors of HIV disclosure to secondary partners and sexual risk behavior among a high-risk sample of HIV-positive MSM: Results from six epicenters in the US. AIDS Care, 20, 925–930.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Semple, S. J., Patterson, T. L., & Grant, I. (2000a). Partner type and sexual risk behavior among HIV positive gay and bisexual men: Social cognitive correlates. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 340–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Semple, S. J., Patterson, T. L., & Grant, I. (2000b). The sexual negotiation behavior of HIV-positive gay and bisexual men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 934–937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Semple, S. J., Patterson, T. L., Shaw, W. S., Pedlow, C. T., & Grant, I. (1999). Disclosure of HIV seropositivity to sexual partners: An application of social cognitive theory. Behavior Therapy, 30, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Serovich, J. M., Oliver, D. G., Smith, S. A., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Methods of HIV disclosure by men who have sex with men to casual sexual partners. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 19, 823–832.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Serovich, J. M., Reed, S., Grafsky, E. L., & Andrist, D. (2009). An intervention to assist men who have sex with men disclose their serostatus to casual sex partners: Results from a pilot study. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 207–219.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Simoni, J. M., & Pantalone, D. W. (2004). Secrets and safety in the age of AIDS: Does HIV disclosure lead to safer sex? Topics in HIV Medicine, 12, 109–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei, C., Lim, S. H., Guadamuz, T. E., & Koe, S. (2012). HIV disclosure and sexual transmission behaviors among an internet sample of HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Asia: Implications for prevention with positives. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 1970–1978.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Whisman, M. A. (1990). The efficacy of booster maintenance sessions in behavior therapy: Review and methodological critique. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winter, A. K., Sullivan, P. S., Khosropour, C. M., & Rosenberg, E. S. (2012). Discussion of HIV status by serostatus and partnership sexual risk among internet-using MSM in the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 60, 525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolitski, R. J., Gómez, C. A., & Parsons, J. T. (2005). Effects of a peer-led behavioral intervention to reduce HIV transmission and promote serostatus disclosure among HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men. AIDS, 19, S99–S109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julianne M. Serovich
    • 1
  • Tanja C. Laschober
    • 1
  • Monique J. Brown
    • 1
  • Judy A. Kimberly
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Behavioral and Community SciencesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations