Preferences for Injectable PrEP Among Young U.S. Cisgender Men and Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men
- 334 Downloads
Young men who have sex with men account for approximately 20% of incident HIV infections in the U.S. Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administered as a daily pill has been shown to decrease HIV acquisition in at-risk individuals. New modalities for PrEP are being developed and tested, including injectable PrEP; however, acceptability of these emerging modalities has not yet been examined in youth. We conducted six focus groups with 36 young men and transgender men and women who have sex with men in Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles in 2016 to assess interest in and preference for different PrEP modalities. Youth were purposively recruited based on diversity of age, race/ethnicity, and prior PrEP experience. Data were coded using content coding based on key domains of the interview guide, in particular around the central themes of interest in and barriers and facilitators to injectable PrEP use. Participants were knowledgeable about oral PrEP but suggested barriers to broader uptake, including stigma, marginalization, and access to information. While participants were split on preference for injectable versus oral PrEP, they agreed quarterly injections may be more manageable and better for those who have adherence difficulties and for those who engage in sex more frequently. Concerns specific to injectable PrEP included: severity/duration of side effects, pain, level of protection prior to next injection, distrust of medical system and injections, and cost. Understanding barriers to and preferences for diverse prevention modalities will allow for more HIV prevention options, improved products, and better interventions, thus allowing individuals to make informed HIV prevention choices.
KeywordsHIV prevention Pre-exposure prophylaxis Men who have sex with men Transgender Sexual orientation
This study was supported by Viiv Healthcare, Inc. Additional support for Dr. Mayer’s role was provided by the Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH Funded Program (P30 AI060354), which is supported by the following NIH Co-Funding and Participating Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NICHD, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, NIA, NIDDK, NIGMS, NIMHD, FIC, and OAR. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Berkowitz, S. (1997). Analyzing qualitative data. In J. Frechtling & L. Sharp (Eds.), The user-friendly handbook for mixed-method evaluations (Chap. 4). National Science Foundation. Retrieved September 13, 2017 from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/chap_4.htm.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). HIV surveillance report: Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2015-vol-27.pdf.
- Freeman, R., Gwadz, M. V., Silverman, E., Kutnick, A., Leonard, N. R., Ritchie, A. S., … Martinez, B. Y. (2017). Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: A qualitative exploration. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16, 54. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0549-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Golub, S. A., Gamarel, K. E., Rendina, H. J., Surace, A., & Lelutiu-Weinberger, C. L. (2013). From efficacy to effectiveness: Facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 27, 248–254.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Grant, R. M., Anderson, P. L., McMahan, V., Liu, A., Amico, K. R., Mehrotra, M., … Glidden, D. V. (2014). Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: A cohort study. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 14, 820–829.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hosek, S., Celum, C., Wilson, C. M., Kapgiannis, B., Delany-Moretlwe, S., & Bekker, L. G. (2016). Preventing HIV among adolescents with oral PrEP: Observations and challenges in the United States and South Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 19, 21107. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.7.21107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, J. C. (1990). Selecting ethnographic informants. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Krakower, D. S., Mimiaga, M. J., Rosenberger, J. G., Novak, D. S., Mitty, J. A., White, J. M., & Mayer, K. H. (2012). Limited awareness and low immediate uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using an internet social networking site. PLoS ONE, 7, e33119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Markowitz, M., Frank, I., Grant, R., Mayer, K. H., Margolis, D. A., Hudson, K. J., … Spreen, W. (2016). ECLAIR: Phase 2A Safety and PK study of Cabotegravir LA in HIV-uninfected men. Presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Mayer, K. H., Biello, K. B., Novak, D. S., Krakower, D., & Mimiaga, M.J. (2017). PrEP uptake disparities in a diverse online sample of U.S. men who have sex with men. Presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- McCormack, S., Dunn, D. T., Desai, M., Dolling, D. I., Gafos, M., Gilson, R., … Gill, O. N. (2015). Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): Effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet, 387, 53–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyers, K., Rodriguez, K., Moeller, R. W., Gratch, I., Markowitz, M., & Halkitis, P. N. (2014). High interest in a long-acting injectable formulation of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in young men who have sex with men in NYC: A P18 cohort substudy. PLoS ONE, 9, e114700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Milena, Z. R., Dainora, G., & Alin, S. (2008). Qualitative research methods: A comparison between focus-group and in-depth interview. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17, 1279–1283.Google Scholar
- Parsons, J. T., Rendina, H. J., Whitfield, T. H., & Grov, C. (2016). Familiarity with and preferences for oral and long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a national sample of gay and bisexual men in the US. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 1390–1399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Suite, D. H., La Bril, R., Primm, A., & Harrison-Ross, P. (2007). Beyond misdiagnosis, misunderstanding and mistrust: Relevance of the historical perspective in the medical and mental health treatment of people of color. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99, 879.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- US Public Health Service. (2014). Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2014: A clinical practice guideline. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control.Google Scholar