Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 1547–1550 | Cite as

A Response to Commentaries on “Beyond Sexual Orientation: Integrating Gender/Sex and Diverse Partnered Sexualities via Sexual Configurations Theory” (van Anders, 2015)



Partner Sexuality Parental Leave Sexual Diversity Sexuality Study Sexual Configuration Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barker, M. J., & Scheele, J. (2016). Queer: A graphic history. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  2. Chivers, M. L. (2016). The rainbow becomes a spectrum [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 491–493. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0711-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grzanka, P. R. (2016). Intersections and configurations [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 501–503. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0624-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2016). The power of (but not in?) sexual configurations theory [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 495–499. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0669-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Moser, C. (2016). Defining sexual orientation [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 505–508. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0625-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Reiss, I. L. (2016). A sociological perspective [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 509–511. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0634-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger (pp. 1–28). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Schudson, Z. S., Dibble, E. R., & van Anders, S. M. (2017). Gender/sex and sexual diversity via sexual configurations theory: Insights from a qualitative study with gender and sexual minorities. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  10. Subramaniam, B., & Willey, A. (2016). Fighting the derpy science of sexuality [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 513–515. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0626-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Valentova, J. V., & Varella, M. A. C. (2016). Further steps toward a truly integrative theory of sexuality [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 517–520. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0630-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2016). More colors in a rainbow [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 521–523. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0627-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Psychology and Women’s Studies, Program in Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences Program, Science, Technology, & Society Program and Biosocial Methods CollaborativeUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Psychology and Women’s StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations