Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 1607–1608 | Cite as

Proceed with Caution: Interpreting Evidence for Prenatal Influences on Sexual Orientation

  • Simon LeVayEmail author
Commentary

In recent decades, scientific discourse on the topic of sexual orientation has progressed from “Is it biological?” to “What kind of biological?” Breedlove’s own intellectual journey, eloquently recounted in his Target Article (Breedlove, 2017), illustrates this evolution well, and it is particularly telling given his close involvement in the field over many years. Yet the answer he offers—that there’s a clear-cut difference between the mechanisms determining sexual orientation in men and in women—should be viewed with some caution.

Breedlove, like most others in the field, subscribes to a neurohormonal theory of sexual orientation: Androgen-sensitive brain regions that mediate sexual attraction, Breedlove believes, develop in a sex-atypical fashion in fetuses who become same-sex-attracted adults. What’s novel about Breedlove’s article is his assertion that a clear sex difference exists with respect to the mechanisms underlying the development of lesbians and gay men. Diversity in...

Keywords

Sexual Orientation Androgen Level Sexual Attraction Digit Ratio Prenatal Androgen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bogaert, A. F., & Hershberger, S. (1999). The relation between sexual orientation and penile size. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 213–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Breedlove, S. M. (2017). Prenatal influences on human sexual orientation: Expectations versus data. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0904-2.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, W. M., Finn, C. J., Cooke, B. M., & Breedlove, S. M. (2002). Differences in finger length ratios between self-identified “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 123–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Grimbos, T., Dawood, K., Burriss, R. P., Zucker, K. J., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Sexual orientation and the second to fourth finger length ratio: A meta-analysis in men and women. Behavioral Neuroscience, 124, 278–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Manning, J. T., Churchill, A. J., & Peters, M. (2007). The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 223–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin, J. T., & Nguyen, D. H. (2004). Anthropometric analysis of homosexuals and heterosexuals: Implications for early hormone exposure. Hormones and Behavior, 45, 31–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Williams, T. J., Pepitone, M. E., Christensen, S. E., Cooke, B. M., Huberman, A. D., Breedlove, N. J., et al. (2000). Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature, 404, 455–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.West HollywoodUSA

Personalised recommendations