Abstract
The present study examined the relations between sociosexuality and the desirability and the use of innocuous, direct, and cute–flippant opening lines. A total of 216 women rated the desirability of each type of opening line and answered the revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI-R). A total of 198 men reported the use of types of opening lines and answered the SOI-R. The desirability of cute–flippant lines, which were the least preferred lines, was positively related to sociosexuality, while the use of cute lines was not associated with sociosexuality. In addition, the use of innocuous and direct lines was positively related to sociosexuality. It may be that unrestricted men use innocuous and direct lines as a strategy to start conversation before flirting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Correlations between sociosexual behavior, attitude, and desire were moderate, r = .23–.51 for women (ps < .01) and r = .25–.47 for men (ps < .01).
References
Bale, C., Morrison, R., & Caryl, P. G. (2006). Chat-up lines as male sexual displays. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 655–664. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.016.
Bredow, C. A., Cate, R. M., & Huston, T. L. (2008). Have we met before? A conceptual model of first romantic encounters. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 3–28). New York: Psychological Press.
Cooper, M., O’Donnell, D., Caryl, P. G., Morrison, R., & Bale, C. (2007). Chat-up lines as male displays: Effects of content, sex, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1075–1085. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.001.
Cunningham, M. R. (1989). Reactions to heterosexual opening gambits: Female selectivity and male responsiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 27–41. doi:10.1177/0146167289151003.
Cunningham, M. R., & Barbee, A. P. (2008). Prelude to a kiss: Nonverbal flirting, opening gambits, and other communication dynamics in the initiation of romantic relationships. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 97–120). New York: Psychological Press.
Hall, J. A., & Canterberry, M. (2011). Sexism and assertive courtship strategies. Sex Roles, 65, 840–853. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0045-y.
Kerckhoff, A. C. (1974). The social context of interpersonal attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 61–78). New York: Academic Press.
Kleinke, C. L., Meeker, F. B., & Staneski, R. A. (1986). Preference for opening lines: Comparing ratings by men and women. Sex Roles, 15, 585–600. doi:10.1007/BF00288216.
Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Herold, E. S. (1997). The scripting of sexual behaviour: Canadian university students on spring break in Florida. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 317–328.
Maticka-Tyndale, E., Herold, E. S., & Mewhinney, D. (1998). Casual sex on spring break: Intentions and behaviors of Canadian students. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 254–264. doi:10.1080/00224499809551941.
Nakamine, S. (2015). Opposite sex relationship initiation in town among undergraduates: Focusing on interaction between male and female. Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 77–86.
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (2012). Report on the fourteenth Japanese national fertility survey in 2010 volume 2: Attitudes toward marriage and the family among Japanese singles. Retrieved from http://www.ipss.go.jp/syoushika/bunken/data/pdf/207750.pdf
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437.
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York: Holt.
Senko, C., & Fyffe, V. (2010). An evolutionary perspective on effective vs. ineffective pick-up lines. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 648–667. doi:10.1080/00224540903365539.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
Tombs, S., & Silverman, I. (2004). Pupillometry: A sexual selection approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.001.
Wade, T. J., Butrie, L. K., & Hoffman, K. M. (2009). Women’s direct opening lines are perceived as most effective. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 145–149. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.016.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Yutaka Matsui for his helpful direction on the research and Miyuki Aiba, Yuta Chishima, Ikuo Daibo, Kei Fuji, Yuu Kasagi, Shun Kohama, Xinhua Mao, Tatsuya Murakami, and Takuma Nishimura for their assistance with data collection. I would also like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakamine, S. Does Sociosexuality Affect Use and Desirability of Different Types of Opening Lines Among Young Japanese?. Arch Sex Behav 46, 1777–1783 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0940-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0940-6