Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 7, pp 2173–2185 | Cite as

The Committed Intimate Partnerships of Incarcerated African-American Men: Implications for Sexual HIV Transmission Risk and Prevention Opportunities

  • Maria R. Khan
  • Nabila El-Bassel
  • Carol E. Golin
  • Joy D. Scheidell
  • Adaora A. Adimora
  • Ashley M. Coatsworth
  • Hui Hu
  • Selena Judon-Monk
  • Katie P. Medina
  • David A. Wohl
Original Paper

Abstract

Incarceration is thought to influence HIV transmission by disrupting partnerships that provide support and protect against sex risk-taking. Current correctional facility-based family-strengthening programs focus on marital partnerships, a minority of inmates’ partnerships. Research on the sex partnerships of incarcerated African-American men and the types of partnerships most likely to protect against HIV-related sex risk is limited. Improved understanding can inform expansion of correctional facility-based family-strengthening programs to a greater proportion of protective partnerships and HIV risk reduction programs to partnerships vulnerable to sex risk. Project DISRUPT is a cohort study of African-American men being released from prison in North Carolina who were in committed heterosexual partnerships at prison entry. Using baseline survey data (N = 189), we conducted latent class analysis (LCA) to identify subgroups of participants with distinct relationship profiles and measured associations between relationship characteristics and multiple partnerships of inmates and their partners in the six months before incarceration. LCA indicated a two-class solution, with relationships distinguished by satisfaction/stability (satisfied/stable class: 58.0%; dissatisfied/unstable class: 42.0%); each class had comparable relationship length and levels of marriage and cohabitation. Dissatisfied/unstable relationships were associated with multiple partnerships among participants (AOR 2.93, 95% CI 1.50, 5.72) and partners (AOR 4.95, 95% CI 1.68, 14.58). Satisfaction indicators—versus length, marriage, or cohabitation—were the strongest independent correlates of inmates’ and partners’ multiple partnerships. Pre-incarceration economic deprivation, mental disorder symptoms, substance use, and violence in relationships were associated with dissatisfaction/instability. Prison-based programs designed to maintain healthy partnerships, strengthen relationship skills, and reduce HIV risk-taking and violence in relationships are warranted and should be targeted to both marital and nonmarital partnerships. Programming also should address the poverty, mental illness, and substance use factors that threaten relationship satisfaction/stability and increase HIV risk.

Keywords

Incarceration Committed partnerships Sexual risk behavior HIV 

References

  1. Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Bonas, D. M., Martinson, F. E., Donaldson, K. H., & Stancil, T. R. (2002). Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology, 13(3), 320–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., & Doherty, I. (2007). Concurrent sexual partnership among men in the US. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 2230–2237.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Martinson, F. E., Coyne-Beasley, T., Doherty, I., Stancil, T. R., & Fullilove, R. E. (2006). Heterosexually transmitted HIV infection among African Americans in North Carolina. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 41(5), 616–623. doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000191382.62070.a5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Taylor, E. M., Khan, M. R., & Schwartz, R. J. (2011). Concurrent partnerships, nonmonogamous partners, and substance use among women in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 101(1), 128–136. doi:10.2105/Ajph.2009.174292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Browning, S., Miller, S., & Lisa, M. (2001). Criminal incarceration dividing the ties that bind: Black men and their families. Journal of African American Men, 6(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey, M. P., Senn, T. E., Seward, D. X., & Vanable, P. A. (2010). Urban African-American men speak out on sexual partner concurrency: Findings from a qualitative study. AIDS and Behavior, 14(1), 38–47. doi:10.1007/s10461-008-9406-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Replicating effective programs plus: Connect: A couples-level intervention for heterosexual couples at risk for HIV/STIs. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/rep/packages/connect.html.
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). HIV among African Americans. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/racialethnic/aa/facts/index.html.
  9. Coogan, P. F., Yu, J., O’Conner, G.T., Brown, T.A., Palmer, J.R., & Rosenberg, L. (2014). Depressive symptoms and the incidence of adult-onset asthma in African American women. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 112(4), 333–338.e1. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2013.12.025.
  10. El-Bassel, N., Gilbert, L., Wu, E., Witte, S. S., Chang, M., Hill, J., & Remien, R. H. (2011). Couple-based HIV prevention for low-income drug users from New York City: A randomized controlled trial to reduce dual risks. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 58(2), 198–206. doi:10.1097/Qai.0b013e318229eab1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Epperson, M. W., El-Bassel, N., Chang, M., & Gilbert, L. (2010a). Examining the temporal relationship between criminal justice involvement and sexual risk behaviors among drug-involved men. Journal of Urban Health, 87(2), 324–336. doi:10.1007/s11524-009-9429-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Epperson, M. W., Khan, M. R., Miller, D. P., Perron, B. E., El-Bassel, N., & Gilbert, L. (2010b). Assessing criminal justice involvement as an indicator of human immunodeficiency virus risk among women in methadone treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38(4), 375–383. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.03.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality-disorders (SCID-II). 1. Description. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9(2), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grieb, S. M., Davey-Rothwell, M., & Latkin, C. A. (2012). Concurrent sexual partnerships among urban African American high-risk women with main sex partners. AIDS and Behavior, 16(2), 323–333. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-9954-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Grinstead, O. A., Faigeles, B., Comfort, M., Seal, D., Nealey-Moore, J., Belcher, L., & Morrow, K. (2005). HIV, STD, and hepatitis risk to primary female partners of men being released from prison. Women and Health, 41(2), 63–80. doi:10.1300/J013v41n02_05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grinstead, O., Zack, B., & Faigeles, B. (2001). Reducing postrelease risk behavior among HIV seropositive prison inmates: The health promotion program. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13(2), 109–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Harawa, N., & Adimora, A. (2008). Incarceration, African Americans and HIV: Advancing a research agenda. Journal of the National Medical Association, 100(1), 57–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan, M. R., Behrend, L., Adimora, A. A., Weir, S. S., Tisdale, C., & Wohl, D. A. (2011a). Dissolution of primary intimate relationships during incarceration and associations with post-release STI/HIV risk behavior in a Southeastern city. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 38(1), 43–47. doi:10.1097/Olq.0b013e3181e969d0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan, M. R., Behrend, L., Adimora, A. A., Weir, S. S., White, B. L., & Wohl, D. A. (2011b). Dissolution of primary intimate relationships during incarceration and implications for post-release HIV transmission. Journal of Urban Health, 88(2), 365–375. doi:10.1007/s11524-010-9538-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan, M. R., Berger, A., Hemberg, J., O’Neill, A., Dyer, T. P., & Smyrk, K. (2013a). Non-injection and injection drug use and STI/HIV risk in the United States: The degree to which sexual risk behaviors versus sex with an STI-infected partner account for infection transmission among drug users. AIDS and Behavior, 17(3), 1185–1194. doi:10.1007/s10461-012-0276-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan, M. R., Doherty, I. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Taylor, E. M., Epperson, M. W., & Adimora, A. A. (2009). Incarceration and high-risk sex partnerships among men in the United States. Journal of Urban Health, 86(4), 584–601. doi:10.1007/s11524-009-9348-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan, M. R., Epperson, M., & Comfort, M. (2012). A novel conceptual model that describes the influence of arrest and incarceration on STI/HIV transmission. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Khan, M. R., Epperson, M. W., Mateu-Gelabert, P., Bolyard, M., Sandoval, M., & Friedman, S. R. (2011c). Incarceration, sex with an STI- or HIV-infected partner, and infection with an STI or HIV in Bushwick, Brooklyn, NY: A social network perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 101(6), 1110–1117. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.184721.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan, M. R., Golin, C. E., Friedman, S. R., Scheidell, J. D., Adimora, A. A., Judon-Monk, S., … Wohl, D. A. (2015). STI/HIV sexual risk behavior and prevalent STI among incarcerated African American men in committed partnerships: The significance of poverty, mood disorders, and substance use. AIDS and Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1062-6.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan, M. R., Scheidell, J. D., Gaydos, C. A., Coatsworth, A. M., & Latimer, W. W. (2013). Marital status and sexually transmitted infection risk among non-injection and injection drug users. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association annual meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Kukorowski, D. (2012). The price to call home: State-sanctioned monopolization in the prison phone industry. Retrieved from http://www.prisonpolicy.org/phones/report.html.
  27. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models handbook of quantitative methodology for social science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Mazzaferro, K. E., Murray, P. J., Ness, R. B., Bass, D. C., Tyus, N., & Cook, R. L. (2006). Depression, stress, and social support as predictors of high-risk sexual behaviors and STIs in young women. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(4), 601–603. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.02.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Muthén, B., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  30. Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raj, A., Santana, M. C., La Marche, A., Amaro, H., Cranston, K., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Perpetration of intimate partner violence associated with sexual risk behaviors among young adult men. American Journal of Public Health, 96(10), 1873–1878. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.081554.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sabourin, S., Valois, P., & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 15–27. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Senn, T. E., Scott-Sheldon, L. A., Seward, D. X., Wright, E. M., & Carey, M. P. (2011). Sexual partner concurrency of urban male and female STD clinic patients: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 775–784. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9688-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson, J. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships—Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 683–692. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.4.683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., BoneyMcCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)—Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). Incarceration and the family: A review of research and promising approaches for serving fathers and families. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/mfs-ip/incarceration&family/index.shtml.
  38. Wilson, B., & Stuchbury, R. (2010). Do partnerships last? Comparing marriage and cohabitation using longitudinal census data. Population Trends, 139, 37–63. doi:10.1057/pt.2010.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhan, W., Hansen, N. B., Shaboltas, A. V., Skochilov, R. V., Kozlov, A. P., Krasnoselskikh, T. V., & Abdala, N. (2012). Partner violence perpetration and victimization and HIV risk behaviors in St. Petersburg, Russia. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25(1), 86–93. doi:10.1002/jts.21658.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria R. Khan
    • 1
  • Nabila El-Bassel
    • 2
  • Carol E. Golin
    • 3
    • 4
  • Joy D. Scheidell
    • 1
  • Adaora A. Adimora
    • 5
    • 6
  • Ashley M. Coatsworth
    • 7
  • Hui Hu
    • 7
  • Selena Judon-Monk
    • 5
  • Katie P. Medina
    • 5
  • David A. Wohl
    • 5
  1. 1.Division of Comparative Effectiveness and Decision Science, Department of Population HealthNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Social Intervention GroupColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Division of General Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.Division of Infectious DiseaseUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of MedicineChapel HillUSA
  6. 6.Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  7. 7.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, College of MedicineGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations