The Puzzle of Male Chronophilias
- 6.4k Downloads
In this article, I return to the idea that pedophilia, a sexual interest in prepubescent children, can be considered a sexual orientation for age, in conjunction with the much more widely acknowledged and discussed sexual orientation for gender. Here, I broaden the scope to consider other chronophilias, referring to paraphilias for age/maturity categories other than young sexually mature adults. The puzzle of chronophilias includes questions about etiology and course, how chronophilias are related to each other, and what they can tell us about how human (male) sexuality is organized. In this article, I briefly review research on nepiophilia (infant/toddlers), pedophilia (prepubescent children), hebephilia (pubescent children), ephebophilia (postpubescent, sexually maturing adolescents), teleiophilia (young sexually mature adults, typically 20s and 30s), mesophilia (middle-aged adults, typically 40s and 50s), and gerontophilia (elderly adults, typically 60s and older) in the context of a multidimensional sexual orientations framework. Relevant research, limitations, and testable hypotheses for future work are identified.
KeywordsAge preferences Chronophilias Paraphilias Sexual orientation
This article began as a talk given at the 2015 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting held at the University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, in July 2015. A Storify of live tweets from this meeting is available at: https://storify.com/MCSeto/puzzles-of-sexual-orientation-2015. I am grateful for travel support from the Royal’s Institute of Mental Health Research and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. My deep thanks to Kelly Babchishin, Ray Blanchard, James Cantor, Meredith Chivers, Martin Lalumière, and Skye Stephens for their very helpful feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. This article builds directly on Seto (2012), an article I wrote after my presentation at the 2010 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting that was part of a previous special issue in this journal.
Travel to attend the Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting was provided by the Royal’s Institute of Mental Health Research and a meeting grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Beier, K. M., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Konrad, A., & Schaefer, G. A. (2009). Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: First results of the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.04.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Cantor, J. M., & Blak, T. (2003). Self-reported head injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and nonpedophilic men referred for clinical assessment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 573–581. doi: 10.1023/A:1026093612434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., … Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.
- Buss, D. M. (2014). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Beckstead, A. L., … Kuban, M. E. (2004). Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology, 18, 3–14. doi: 10.1037/0894-4184.108.40.206.
- Cantor, J. M., Kabani, N., Christensen, B. K., Zipursky, R. B., Barbaree, H. E., Dickey, R., … Blanchard, R. (2008). Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 167–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.10.013.
- Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., & Copen, C. (2011, March). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth (National Health Statistics Reports, No. 36). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Chivers, M. L. (2015, July). Sexual psychophysiology and its complicated relationship with women’s sexual orientation. Talk presented at the 2015 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB.Google Scholar
- Chivers, M. L., Dawson, S. J., Curry, S., Bradford, J. M. W., & Seto, M. C. (2015, August). Paraphilic sexual interests and behaviors of men and women: An online survey. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Chivers, M. L., Roy, C., Grimbos, T., Cantor, J. M., & Seto, M. C. (2014). Specificity of sexual arousal for preferred sexual activities in men and women with conventional and masochistic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 931–940. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0174-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clancy, K. (2012, January 18). Interrogating claims about natural sexual behavior: More on deep thinking hebephile. Available at http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/context-and-variation/2012/01/18/interrogating-claims-about-natural-sexual-behavior-more-on-deep-thinkinghebephile.
- Dawson, S. J., Bannerman, B. A., & Lalumière, M. L. (2014). Paraphilic interests: An examination of sex differences in a nonclinical sample. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 20–45. doi: 10.1177/1079063214525645.
- Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Diamond, L. M. (2015, July). Sexual fluidity in women and men: What is the relevant time scale? Talk presented at the 2015 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB.Google Scholar
- Dyshniku, F., Murray, M. E., Fazio, R. L., Lykins, A. D., & Cantor, J. M. (2015). Minor physical anomalies as a window into the prenatal origins of pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2151–2159. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0564-7.
- Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., & Chaffin, M. (2009). Juveniles who commit sex offenses against minors. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
- Freund, K., Seto, M. C., & Kuban, M. (1995). Masochism: A multiple case study. Sexuologie, 4, 313–324.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, D. M., Bradford, J., & Curry, S. (1995). Infantophilia—A new subcategory of pedophilia? A preliminary study. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 23, 63–71.Google Scholar
- Grundmann, D., Krupp, J., Scherner, G., Amelung, T., & Beier, K. M. (2016). Stability of self-reported arousal to sexual fantasies involving children in a clinical sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1153–1162. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0729-z.
- Harris, G. T., Lalumière, M. L., Seto, M. C., Rice, M. E., & Chaplin, T. C. (2012). Explaining the erectile responses of rapists to rape stories: The contributions of sexual activity, non-consent, and violence with injury. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 41, 221–229. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9940-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herman-Giddens, M. E., Slora, E. J., Wasserman, R. C., Bourdony, C. J., Bhapkar, M. V., Koch, G. G., & Hasemeier, C. M. (1997). Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: A study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. Pediatrics, 99, 505–512. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.4.505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herman-Giddens, M. E., Wang, L., & Koch, G. (2001). Secondary sexual characteristics in boys: Estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988–1994. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 155, 1022–1028. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.9.1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hsu, K., & Bailey, J. M. (2015, July). Autopedophilia: Evidence for erotic target location errors in pedohebephilic men. Poster presented at the 2015 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB.Google Scholar
- Hsu, K. J., Rosenthal, A. M., Miller, D. I., & Bailey, J. M. (2015). Who are gynandromorphophilic men? Characterizing men with sexual interest in transgender women [online first]. Psychological Medicine, 46, 819–827. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002317.
- Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1275–1288. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9595-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones, D., Brace, C. L., Jankowiak, W., Laland, K. N., Musselman, L. E., Langlois, J. H., … Symons, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36, 723–748.Google Scholar
- Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1166–1172. doi: 10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
- Lanska, D. J., Lanska, M. J., Hartz, A. J., & Rimm, A. A. (1984). Factors influencing anatomic location of fat tissue in 52,953 women. International Journal of Obesity, 9, 29–38.Google Scholar
- Marsh, A. (2010). Love among the objectum sexuals. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 13. http://www.ejhs.org/volume13/ObjSexuals.htm.
- Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition of childhood, adolescence, and maturity. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
- Moore, K. A., Liechty, J., Ikramullah, E., & Cottingham, S. (2005). Sex between young teens and older individuals: A demographic portrait. Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
- Ogas, O., & Gaddam, S. (2011). A billion wicked thoughts: What the Internet tells us about sexual relationships. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Ponseti, J., Granert, O., Van Eimeren, T., Jansen, O., Wolff, S., Beier, K., … Roman Siebner, H. (2015). Assessing paedophilia based on the haemodynamic brain response to face images. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 17, 39–46. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2015.1083612.
- Pornhub Insights. (2015, March). http://www.pornhub.com/insights/pornhub-age.
- Rudder, C. (2014). Dataclysm: Who we are (when we think no one’s looking). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Santtila, P., Antfolk, J., Räfså, A., Hartwig, M., Sariola, H., Sandnabba, N. K., & Mokros, A. (2015). Men’s sexual interest in children: One-year incidence and correlates in a population-based sample of Finnish male twins. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24, 115–134. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.997410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Savin-Williams, R. C. (2015, July). The sexual/romantic continuum: Mostly straight and mostly gay young men. Talk presented at the 2015 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB.Google Scholar
- Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., … Penton-Voak, I. S. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 14388–14393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409643111.
- Seto, M. C., Stephens, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Cantor, J. M. (2015). The revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1177/1079063215612444.
- Snyder, H. N. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. A NIBRS Statistical Report. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
- Stephens, S. (2015). Hebephilic sexual interests in sexual offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Goodwill, A. M., & Cantor, J. M. (in press). The assessment of hebephilic sexual interests: Evidence for convergent validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Tanner, J. M. (1990). Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Troup-Leasure, K., & Snyder, H. N. (2005). Statutory rape known to law enforcement. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
- Yule, M. A., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015, July). Sexual fantasy and masturbation among asexual individuals. Poster presented at the 2015 Puzzle of Sexual Orientation meeting, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB.Google Scholar
- Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Van Noord, P. A., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., Vrieswijk, B., & Karbaat, J. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484–487. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar