Heterosexual Male Carriers Could Explain Persistence of Homosexuality in Men: Individual-Based Simulations of an X-Linked Inheritance Model
Homosexuality has been documented throughout history and is found in almost all human cultures. Twin studies suggest that homosexuality is to some extent heritable. However, from an evolutionary perspective, this poses a problem: Male homosexuals tend to have on average five times fewer children than heterosexual males, so how can a phenomenon associated with low reproductive success be maintained at relatively stable frequencies? Recent findings of increased maternal fecundity of male homosexuals suggest that the genes responsible for homosexuality in males increase fecundity in the females who carry them. Can an increase in maternal fecundity compensate for the fecundity reduction in homosexual men and produce a stable polymorphism? In the current study, this problem was addressed with an individual-based modeling (IBM) approach. IBM suggests that male homosexuality can be maintained in a population at low and stable frequencies if roughly more than half of the females and half of the males are carriers of genes that predispose the male to homosexuality.
KeywordsHomosexuality Simulation Population Genetics X-linked Sexual orientation
I thank Lexo Gavashelishvili and David Tarkhnishvili for providing valuable suggestions on manuscript. I express my gratitude to Ryan Erickson and Cort Anderson for improving the use of English in the article. I also thank three anonymous reviewers and the Editor for their helpful comments.
- Borrill, P. L., & Tesfatsion, L. (2011). Agent-based modeling: The right mathematics for the social sciences? In J. B. Davis & D. W. Hands (Eds.), Elgar companion to recent economic methodology (pp. 228–259). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gates, G. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender? Los Angeles: The Williams Institute of the University of California.Google Scholar
- Grimm, V., & Railsback, S. F. (2013). Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Nash, G. (2001). The subversive male: Homosexual and bestial images on European mesolithic rock art. In L. Bevan (Ed.), Indecent exposure: Sexuality, society and the archaeological record (pp. 43–55). Glasgow, UK: Cruithne Press.Google Scholar
- Roughgarden, J. (2012). Individual based models in ecology: An evaluation, or how not to ruin a good thing. Paper presented at the Philosophy of Science Association Biennial Meeting, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9434/1/RoughgardenPSA2012IBMLecture.pdf.
- Seligman, M. E. (2009). What you can change and what you can’t: The complete guide to successful self-improvement. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J. E., & Jaenike, J. (2003). Sperm competition and the dynamics of X chromosome drive in finite and structured populations. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 40, 195–206.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar