Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 1513–1524 | Cite as

Geosocial Networking App Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Serious Romantic Relationships

  • Kathryn MacapagalEmail author
  • Ryan Coventry
  • Jae A. Puckett
  • Gregory PhillipsII
  • Brian Mustanski
Original Paper

Abstract

Geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications (“apps”) are used frequently among men who have sex with men (MSM) to socialize and meet sexual partners. Though GSN apps are used by some MSM in partnered relationships, little is known about how the use of GSN apps among MSM in serious romantic relationships can influence couples’ sexual and relationship health. MSM in serious relationships (N = 323; M age = 40 years) were recruited through a popular GSN app for MSM. Participants completed open-ended items regarding the costs and benefits of app use to their relationships, discussions of app use with their partners, and preferences for relationship education related to app use. Reported benefits of app use included improving sex and communication with one’s primary partner and fulfilling unmet sexual needs. Although approximately half had not discussed app use with their partners, citing app use as a “non-issue,” many cited various drawbacks to app use, including jealousy and being a distraction from the relationship. Few described sexual health concerns as a drawback to meeting partners through apps. Regarding relationship education preferences, most wanted help with general communication skills and how to express one’s sexual needs to a partner. Although GSN app use can enhance relationships and sex among partnered MSM, unclear communication about app use may contribute to negative relationship outcomes and could prevent partners from having sexual needs met. Relationship and sexual health education programs for male couples should consider addressing social media and technology use in their curricula.

Keywords

Men who have sex with men Male homosexuality Smartphone applications Romantic relationships Sexual communication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Data for this study were gathered in concert with online recruitment efforts for the Keep It Up! randomized clinical trial funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA035145, PI: Mustanski). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors would like to give special thanks to Krystal Madkins and Craig Sineath for managing the advertisement campaign, and Katie Andrews for survey programing and data management.

References

  1. Beymer, M. R., Weiss, R. E., Bolan, R. K., Rudy, E. T., Bourque, L. B., Rodriguez, J. P., & Morisky, D. E. (2014). Sex on demand: Geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 90, 567–572. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051494.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Buzzella, B. A., Whitton, S. W., & Tompson, M. C. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of a relationship education program for male same-sex couples. Couple and Family Psychology, 1, 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clayton, R. B. (2014). The third wheel: The impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 425–430. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u :)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382. doi: 10.1037/h0031619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Goedel, W. C., & Duncan, D. T. (2015). Geosocial-networking app usage patterns of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: Survey among users of Grindr, a mobile dating app. JMIR Public Health Surveillance, 1, e4. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Grindr. (2014, 25 March 2014). Happy Birthday Grindr. Retrieved 21 Dec 2015, from http://www.grindr.com/blog/happy-birthday-grindr2/.
  9. Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men’s use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 390–409. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.871626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality and Culture, 16, 347–365. doi: 10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Kline, G. H., & Stanley, S. M. (2003). Best practice in couple relationship education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 385–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01214.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hertlein, K. M., & Ancheta, K. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: Findings from an open-ended survey. The Qualitative Report, 19, 1–11.Google Scholar
  13. Hoff, C. C., Chakravarty, D., Beougher, S. C., Neilands, T. B., & Darbes, L. A. (2012). Relationship characteristics associated with sexual risk behavior among MSM in committed relationships. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 26, 738–745. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Holloway, I., Pulsipher, C., Gibbs, J., Barman-Adhikari, A., & Rice, E. (2015). Network influences on the sexual risk behaviors of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men using geosocial networking applications. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 112–122. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0989-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Holloway, I. W., Rice, E., Gibbs, J., Winetrobe, H., Dunlap, S., & Rhoades, H. (2014). Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 285–296. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0671-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kubicek, K., Carpineto, J., McDavitt, B., Weiss, G., & Kipke, M. D. (2011). Use and perceptions of the internet for sexual information and partners: A study of young men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 803–816. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9666-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehmiller, J. J., & Ioerger, M. (2014). Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLoS One, 9, e86603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Matthews, S. H. (2005). Crafting qualitative research articles on marriages and families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 799–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00176.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000065.Google Scholar
  20. McKie, R. M., Lachowsky, N. J., & Milhausen, R. R. (2015). The positive impact of technology on young gay men’s dating and sexual relationships in Canada: Results from a focus group study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12, 19–38. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2014.935552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Mustanski, B., Lyons, T., & Garcia, S. C. (2011). Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: A mixed-methods study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 289–300. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9596-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mustanski, B., Newcomb, M. E., & Clerkin, E. M. (2011). Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychology, 30, 597–605. doi: 10.1037/a0023858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips, G. II, Magnus, M., Kuo, I., Rawls, A., Peterson, J., Jia, Y., … Greenberg, A. E. (2014). Use of geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications to find men for sex by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington, DC. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 1630–1637. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0760-9.
  25. Prestage, G., Bavinton, B., Grierson, J., Down, I., Keen, P., Bradley, J., & Duncan, D. (2015). Online dating among australian gay and bisexual men: romance or hooking up? AIDS and Behavior, 19, 1905–1913. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1032-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rendina, H. J., Jimenez, R. H., Grov, C., Ventuneac, A., & Parsons, J. T. (2014). Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York City who use Grindr. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 41–49. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0573-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Rice, E., Holloway, I., Winetrobe, H., Rhoades, H., Barman-Adhikari, A., Gibbs, J., … Dunlap, S. (2012). Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 1, 1–8. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.S4-005.
  28. Rueda, H. A., Lindsay, M., & Williams, L. R. (2014). “She posted it on Facebook”: Mexican American adolescents’ experiences with technology and romantic relationship conflict. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 419–445. doi: 10.1177/0743558414565236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savage, D. (2013). SL Letter of the day: Gay husband single on Grindr. The Stranger. http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/03/21/sl-letter-of-the-day-gay-husband-single-on-grindr.
  30. Stafford, Z. (2012). Should your boyfriend be on Grindr? Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zach-stafford/should-your-boyfriend-be-on-grindr_b_2162263.html.
  31. Van De Wiele, C., & Tong, S. T. (2014). Breaking boundaries: The uses and gratifications of Grindr. Paper presented at the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Winetrobe, H., Rice, E., Bauermeister, J., Petering, R., & Holloway, I. W. (2014). Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. AIDS Care, 26, 1303–1308. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.911811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wyatt, D. (2015). Dear Johnny! A Q&A With SCRUFF’s Johnny Skandros. GUY Magazine. Retrieved on December 22, 2015 from http://guymag.net/articles/cover-story/dear-johnny-a-qa-with-scruffs-johnny-skandros.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Social SciencesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA

Personalised recommendations