The Impact of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages on Young Adults’ Sexual Decision Making: An Experimental Study
- 740 Downloads
Messages that frame a target behavior in terms of its benefits (gain frame) or costs (loss frame) have been widely and successfully used for health promotion and risk reduction. However, the impact of framed messages on decisions to have sex and sexual risk, as well as moderators of these effects, has remained largely unexplored. We used a computerized laboratory task to test the effects of framed messages about condom use on young adults’ sexual decision making. Participants (N = 127) listened to both gain- and loss-framed messages and rated their intentions to have sex with partners who posed a high and low risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The effects of message frame, partner risk, participant gender, ability to adopt the messages, and message presentation order on intentions to have sex were examined. Intentions to have sex with high-risk partners significantly decreased after the loss-framed message, but not after the gain-framed message, and intentions to have sex increased for participants who received the gain-framed message first. Yet, participants found it easier to adopt the gain-framed message. Results suggest that loss-framed messages may be particularly effective in reducing intentions to have sex with partners who might pose a higher risk for STIs, and that message presentation order may alter the relative effectiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages on sexual decision making. Future studies should examine the precise conditions under which gain- and loss-framed messages can promote healthy sexual behaviors and reduce sexual risk behaviors.
KeywordsMessage framing Sexual risk taking Sexual decision making Young adults
Data collection was supported in part by predoctoral fellowships to the first author (F31 MH090895 and TL1 RR025759) and R01 DA017924 to Peter Finn. We are grateful to Caitlin Anderson, Rebeka Schwartz, and Loren Twigg, who assisted with data collection and processing, and to Heather Rupp and Thomas James, who gave feedback on earlier drafts of this article.
- Camenga, D. R., Hieftje, K. D., Fiellin, L. E., Edelman, E. J., Rosenthal, M. S., & Duncan, L. R. (2014). The use of message framing to promote sexual risk reduction in young adolescents: A pilot exploratory study. Health Education Research, 29, 360–366. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2014). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2013. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Middleton, L. S., Kuffel, S. W., & Heiman, J. R. (2008). Effects of experimentally adopted sexual schemas on vaginal response and subjective sexual arousal: A comparison between women with sexual arousal disorder and sexually healthy women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 950–961. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9310-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richardson, J. L., Milam, J., McCutchan, A., Stoyanoff, S., Bolan, R., Weiss, J., … Marks, G. (2004). Effect of brief safer-sex counseling by medical providers to HIV-1 seropositive patients: A multi-clinic assessment. AIDS, 18, 1179–1186. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200405210-00011.
- United States Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2020. (2013). Reproductive and sexual health. Retrieved from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/LHI/reproductiveHealth.aspx.
- Vanable, P. A., Ostrow, D. G., McKirnan, D. J., Taywaditep, K. J., & Hope, B. A. (2000). Impact of combination therapies on HIV risk perceptions and sexual risk among HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay and bisexual men. Health Psychology, 19, 134–145. doi: 10.1037/0278-622.214.171.124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar