Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 743–749 | Cite as

The Temporal Stability of Lack of Sexual Attraction Across Young Adulthood

  • Stephen CranneyEmail author
Original Paper


There is a large and growing literature on the stability of sexual orientation across the lifespan. However, virtually no studies have been conducted on the longitudinal stability of any dimension of asexuality. Here I utilized Kinsey scale-type data from Wave III and Wave IV of the Add Health survey to measure the stability of indicating “not sexually attracted to either males or females” in a forced-choice, Kinsey-type scale and during the time participants were moving through early adulthood (18–26 years in Wave III and 24–32 years in Wave IV). I found that, for the most part, individuals who reported no sexual attraction in Wave III were not the same individuals who reported no sexual attraction in Wave IV, with only three out of the 25 in Wave III who indicated no sexual attraction going on to do the same in Wave IV. This inter-wave consistency was lower than it was for other sexual minorities. However, indicating no sexual attraction in one wave was still a statistically significant predictor of indicating no sexual attraction in the other wave, as was refusing to answer or indicating the “don’t know” option in the other wave. These findings do not necessarily denote change in sexual attraction across waves; the fact that not answering the question in one wave was a significant predictor of indicating no sexual attraction in the other wave provides quantitative evidence for the ambiguities involved in sexual identities when sexuality is taken for granted in the broader culture. This ambiguity affects the operationalization and quantification of asexuality.


Asexuality Sexual interest Sexual orientation 


  1. Add Health. (2015). Questions about data. Retrieved from Accessed 3 Jan 2015.
  2. Aicken, C. R. H., Mercer, C. H., & Cassell, J. A. (2013). Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys. Psychology and Sexuality, 4, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AVEN. (2010). What is ‘asexual elitism’ and why does AVEN discourage it? Retrieved from Accessed 3 Jan 2015.
  4. AVEN. (2011). Asexual Awareness Week Community Survey. Retrieved from Accessed 3 Jan 2015.
  5. AVEN. (2014). AVEN 2014 Community Survey. Retrieved from Accessed 3 Jan 2015.
  6. Bauer, G. R., & Jairam, J. A. (2008). Are lesbians really women who have sex with women (WSW)? Methodological concerns in measuring sexual orientation in health research. Women and Health, 48, 383–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 279–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brotto, L. A., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010). Asexuality: A mixed-methods approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 599–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chasin, C. D. (2011). Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 713–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Romantic love: An fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493, 58–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haydon, A. A., Cheng, M. M., Herring, A. H., McRee, A. L., & Halpern, C. T. (2014). Prevalence and predictors of sexual inexperience in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 221–230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinderliter, A. C. (2009a). Asexuality: A history of a definition. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from Accessed 3 Jan 2015.
  13. Hinderliter, A. C. (2009b). Methodological issues for studying asexuality [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 619–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Höglund, J., Jern, P., Sandnabba, N. K., & Santtila, P. (2014). Finnish women and men who self-report no sexual attraction in the past 12 months: Prevalence, relationship status, and sexual behavior history. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 879–889.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  16. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1995). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. MacNeela, P., & Murphy, A. (2015). Freedom, invisibility, and community: A qualitative study of self-identification with asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 799–812.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mustanski, B., Kuper, L., & Greene, G. J. (2014). Development of sexual orientation and identity. In D. L. Tolman & L. Diamond (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1. Person-based approaches (pp. 597–628). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Poston, D. L., & Baumle, A. K. (2010). Patterns of asexuality in the United States. Demographic Research, 23, 509–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prause, N., & Graham, C. A. (2007). Asexuality: Classification and characterization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 341–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Przybylo, E. (2012). Producing facts: Empirical asexuality and the scientific study of sex. Feminism & Psychology, 23, 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Joyner, K. (2014). The dubious assessment of gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents of Add Health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 413–422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 621–641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Houdenhove, E., Gijs, L., T’sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2014a). Asexuality: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.898015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Houdenhove, E., Gijs, L., T’Sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2014b). Asexuality: Few facts, many questions. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40, 175–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Group in DemographyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations