Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 1233–1242 | Cite as

Effects of Gender Color-Coding on Toddlers’ Gender-Typical Toy Play

  • Wang I. Wong
  • Melissa Hines
Original Paper

Abstract

Gender color-coding of children’s toys may make certain toys more appealing or less appealing to a given gender. We observed toddlers playing with two gender-typical toys (a train, a doll), once in gender-typical colors and once in gender-atypical colors. Assessments occurred twice, at 20–40 months of age and at 26–47 months of age. A Sex × Time × Toy × Color ANOVA showed expected interactions between Sex and Toy and Sex and Color. Boys played more with the train than girls did and girls played more with the doll and with pink toys than boys did. The Sex × Toy × Color interaction was not significant, but, at both time points, boys and girls combined played more with the gender-atypical toy when its color was typical for their sex than when it was not. This effect appeared to be caused largely by boys’ preference for, or avoidance of, the doll and by the use of pink. Also, at both time points, gender differences in toy preferences were larger in the gender-typical than in the gender-atypical color condition. At Time 2, these gender differences were present only in the gender-typical color condition. Overall, the results suggest that, once acquired, gender-typical color preferences begin to influence toy preferences, especially those for gender-atypical toys and particularly in boys. They thus could enlarge differences between boys’ and girls’ toy preferences. Because boys’ and girls’ toys elicit different activities, removing the gender color-coding of toys could encourage more equal learning opportunities.

Keywords

Gender stereotyping Sex-typing Gender differences Toy preferences Color preferences 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Gates Cambridge Trust. Data were presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research in Lisbon, Portugal. We would like to thank the parents, children, children’s centers and nurseries who contributed data to the research, and Mihaela Constantinescu who helped with data coding.

References

  1. Alexander, G. M. (2003). An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: Pink, blue, and the brain. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 7–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to children’s toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, T., & Woods, R. (2009). Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 427–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berenbaum, S. A., & Hines, M. (1992). Early androgens are related to childhood sex- stereotyped toy preferences. Psychological Science, 3, 203–206.Google Scholar
  5. Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes. Child Development, 54, 1335–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabin, R. J., & Mitchell, R. J. (2000). To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: When and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81, 246–248.Google Scholar
  7. Caldera, Y. M., Huston, A. C., & O’Brien, M. (1989). Social interactions and play patterns of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine and neutral toys. Child Development, 60, 70–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiu, S. W., Gervan, S., Fairbrother, C., Johnson, L. L., Owen-Anderson, A. F. H., Bradley, S. J., et al. (2006). Sex-dimorphic color preference in children with gender identity disorder: A comparison to clinical and community controls. Sex Roles, 55, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cunningham, S. J., & MaCrae, C. N. (2011). The colour of gender stereotyping. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 598–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eliot, L. (2009). Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps—and what we can do about it. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  12. Fagot, B. I. (1978). The influence of sex of child on parental reactions to toddler children. Child Development, 49, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagot, B. I. (1983). Interactive behavior code. Unpublished instrument.Google Scholar
  14. Feinman, S. (1981). A status theory of the evaluation of sex-role and age-role behavior. Sex Roles, 10, 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Golombok, S., Rust, J., Zervoulis, K., Croudace, T., Golding, J., & Hines, M. (2012). Continuity in sex-typed behavior from preschool to adolescence: A longitudinal population study of boys and girls aged 3–13 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 591–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halim, M. L., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Zosuls, K. M., Lyrye, L. E., & Greulich, F. K. (2014). Pink frilly dresses and the avoidance of all things “girly”: Children’s appearance rigidity and cognitive theories of gender development. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1091–1101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassett, J. M., Siebert, E. R., & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 359–364.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hines, M. (2010). Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 448–456.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17, 623–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Idle, T., Wood, E., & Desmarais, S. (1993). Gender role socialization in toy play situations: Mothers and fathers with their sons and daughters. Sex Roles, 28, 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jadva, V., Golombok, S., & Hines, M. (2010). Infants’ preferences for toys, colors and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1261–1273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins, J. (Producer). (2011). Fighting the power of pink [Radio broadcast]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b010y39d.
  25. Kusuoka, H., & Hoffman, J. I. E. (2002). Advice on statistical analysis for circulation research. Circulation Research, 91, 662–671.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leinbach, M. D., Hort, B. E., & Fagot, B. I. (1997). Bears are for boys: Metaphorical associations in young children’s gender stereotypes. Cognitive Development, 12, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2011). Pretty in pink: The early development of gender-stereotyped colour preferences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 656–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Masters, J. C., Ford, M. E., Arend, R., Grotevant, H. D., & Clark, L. V. (1979). Modeling and labeling as integrated determinants of children’s sex-typed imitative behavior. Child Development, 50, 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, R. G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orenstein, P. (2011). Cinderella ate my daughter. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of color preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8877–8882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paoletti, J. B. (2012). Pink and blue: Telling the boys from the girls in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pasterski, V., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., & Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paul, A. M. (2011). Is pink necessary? The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/books/review/Paul-t.html.
  37. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236–1238.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Picariello, M. L., Greenberg, D., & Pillemer, D. B. (1990). Children’s sex-related stereotyping of colors. Child Development, 61, 1453–1460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruble, D. N., Lurye, L. E., & Zosuls, K. M. (2010). Pink frilly dresses and early gender identity. Princeton Report on Knowledge, 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/prok/issues/2-2/pink_frilly.xml.
  43. Ruble, D. N., Taylor, L. J., Cyphers, L., Greulich, F. K., Lurye, L. E., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Effect of gender constancy on age-related changes in gender beliefs. Child Development, 78, 1121–1136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schloss, K. B., Poggesi, R. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2011). Effects of university affiliation and “school spirit” on color preferences: Berkeley vs. Stanford. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 498–504.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Serbin, L. A., Connor, J. M., & Iler, I. (1979). Sex-stereotyped and nonstereotyped introductions of new toys in the preschool classroom: An observational study of teacher behavior and its effects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15.Google Scholar
  47. Servin, A., Bohlin, G., & Berlin, L. (1999). Sex differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year-olds’ toy- choice in a structured play-session. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 43–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Snow, M. E., Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1983). Sex-of-child differences in father-child interaction at one year of age. Child Development, 54, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sprafkin, C., Serbin, L. A., Denier, C., & Connor, J. M. (1983). Sex-differentiated play: Cognitive consequences and early interventions. In M. B. Liss (Ed.), Social and cognitive skills: Sex roles and child’s play (pp. 167–192). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Vander Stoep, S. W., & Johnson, D. D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45, 688–701.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations