Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 89–97

Americans’ Attitudes Toward Premarital Sex and Pornography Consumption: A National Panel Analysis

Original Paper

Abstract

National panel data gathered in 2008 (T1) and 2010 (T2) from 420 Black and White US adults aged 18–89 years (M = 45.37, SD = 15.85) were employed to assess prospective associations between pornography consumption and premarital sex attitudes. Premarital sex attitudes were indexed via a composite measure of perceptions of the appropriateness of adults and teenagers having premarital sex. Wright’s (2011) sexual script acquisition, activation, application model (3AM) of media sexual socialization was used as the guiding theoretical framework. The 3AM maintains that sexual media may be used by consumers to inform their sexual scripts but that attitude change from exposure to sexual media is less likely when media scripts are incongruent with consumers’ preexisting scripts. Consistent with these postulates, the association between pornography consumption at T1 and more positive attitudes toward premarital sex at T2 was strongest for younger adults, who are less oppositional to premarital sex than older adults. Contrary to the position that associations between pornography consumption and premarital sex attitudes are due to individuals who already have positive attitudes toward premarital sex selecting content congruent with their attitudes, premarital sex attitudes at T1 did not predict pornography consumption at T2.

Keywords

Pornography Premarital sex Sexual socialization Selective exposure 3AM 

References

  1. Abramson, P. R., & Hayashi, H. (1984). Pornography in Japan: Cross-cultural and theoretical considerations. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 173–183). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, J. P., & Tucker, F. (1973). The myth of sexual permissiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 9, 34–40. doi:10.1080/00224497309550776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography. Final Report (1986, July). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Braun-Courville, D. K., & Rojas, M. (2009). Exposure to sexually explicit web sites and adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. D., & L'Engle, K. L. (2009). X-Rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with US early adolescents exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151. doi:10.1177/0093650208326465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buzzell, T. (2005). Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality and Culture, 9, 28–48. doi:10.1007/BF02908761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Olson, C. D., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30. doi:10.1177/0743558407306348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2007). The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice processes. In R.W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, &J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research (pp. 103–118). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, J. A. (2004). Did growing up in the 1960s leave a permanent mark on attitudes and values? Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 161–183. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (2010). General social surveys, 1972–2010. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  12. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796–816. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elias, V. L., Fullerton, A. S., & Simpson, J. M. (2013). Long-term changes in attitudes toward premarital sex in the United States: Reexamining the role of cohort replacement. Journal of Sex Research. 10.1080/00224499.2013.798610.
  16. Evans, J. H. (1997). Worldviews or social groups as the source of moral value attitudes. Sociological Forum, 12, 371–404. doi:10.1023/A:1024625210910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GSS2008 Sample Panel Wave 2. (2012). Retrieved from http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website/Download/SPSS+Format/.
  18. Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N., & Yuen, C. (2010). Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: Revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 14–20. doi:10.1002/ab.20328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huesmann, L. R. (1986). Psychological processes promoting the relation between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior by the viewer. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 125–139. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00246.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaffee, D., & Straus, M. A. (1987). Sexual climate and reported rape: A state-level analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 107–123. doi:10.1007/BF01542065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kjellgren, C., Priebe, G., Svedin, C., & Langstrom, N. (2010). Sexually coercive behavior in male youth: Population survey of general and specific risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1161–1169. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9572-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lam, C. B., & Chan, D. (2007). The use of cyber pornography by young men in Hong Kong: Some psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 588–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Linz, D., & Malamuth, N. (1993). Pornography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Little, T. D., Card, N. A., Preacher, K. J., & McConnell, E. (2009). Modeling longitudinal data from research on adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 15–54). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Lo, V. H., Neilan, E., Sun, M., & Chiang, S. (1999). Exposure of Taiwanese adolescents to pornographic media and its impact on sexual attitudes and behavior. Asian Journal of Communication, 9, 50–71.Google Scholar
  26. Lo, V. H., & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49, 221–237. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lou, C., Cheng, Y., Gao, E., Zuo, X., Emerson, M. R., & Zabin, L. S. (2012). Media’s contribution to sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors for adolescents and young adults in three Asian cities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, S26–S36.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Malamuth, N., Hald, G., & Koss, M. (2012). Pornography, individual differences in risk and mens acceptance of violence against women in are presentative sample. Sex Roles, 66, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malamuth, N., & Impett, E. A. (2001). Research on sex in the media. What do we know about effects on children and adolescents? In D. G. Singer & J .L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 269–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. McMillen, D. B., & McMillen, M. M. (1977). The analysis of popular culture through social indicators. Journal of Popular Culture, 11, 506–526. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3840.1977.00506.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents exposure to sexually explicit online material and recreational attitudes toward sex. Journal of Communication, 56, 639–660. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2008). Adolescents exposure to sexually explicit internet material and sexual preoccupancy: A three-wave panel study. Media Psychology, 11, 207–234. doi:10.1080/15213260801994238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2010). Processes underlying the effects of adolescents use of sexually explicit internet material: The role of perceived realism. Communication Research, 37, 375–399. doi:10.1177/0093650210362464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011a). The influence of sexually explicit internet material on sexual risk behavior: A comparison of adolescents and adults. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 750–765. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.551996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011b). The influence of sexually explicit internet material and peers on stereotypical beliefs about womens sexual roles: Similarities and differences between adolescents and adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 511–517. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.551996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, J. S., Chassin, L., Presson, C.C., &Sherman, S. J. (2000). Prospective predictors of smoking cessation: A logistic regression application. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C.C. Presson, & S.J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 289–317). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, T. W. (1990). A report: The sexual revolution? Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. The National Data Program for the Social Sciences. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/GSS+Website/About+GSS/National+Data+Program+for+Social+Sciences/.
  39. Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 873–893. doi:10.2307/353202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01009.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. To, S., Ngai, S. S., & Kan, S. L. (2012). Direct and mediating effects of accessing sexually explicit online materials on Hong Kong adolescents attitude, knowledge, and behavior relating to sex. Children and Youth Service Review, 34, 2156–2163. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., Kleiner, S., & Irizarry, Y. (2010). Pornography, normalization, and empowerment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1389–1401. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9592-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harrington, K., Davies, S., Hook, E. W., & Oh, M. K. (2001). Exposure to X-rated movies and adolescents sexual and contraceptive-related attitudes and behaviors. Pediatrics, 107, 1116–1119. doi:10.1542/peds.107.5.1116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Winick, C., & Evans, J. T. (1994). Is there a national standard with respect to attitudes toward sexually explicit media material? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 405–419. doi: 10.1007/BF01541406.
  45. Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–386.Google Scholar
  46. Wright, P. J. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of US adults pornography exposure: Sexual socialization, selective exposure, and the moderating role of unhappiness. Journal of Media Psychology, 24, 67–76. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wright, P. J. (2013a). US males and pornography 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 60–71. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.628132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright, P. J. (2013b). A three-wave longitudinal analysis of preexisting beliefs, exposure to pornography, and attitude change. Communication Reports, 26, 13–25. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.773053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright, P. J., Bae, S., & Funk, M. (2013). United States women and pornography through four decades: Exposure, attitudes, behaviors, individual differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1131–1144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright, P. J., Malamuth, N., & Donnerstein, E. (2012). Research on sex in the media: What do we know about effects on children and adolescents? In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 273–302). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Wright, P. J., & Randall, A. K. (2012). Internet pornography exposure and risky sexual behavior among adult males in the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1410–1416. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright, P. J., & Randall, A. K. (2014). Pornography consumption, education, and support for same-sex marriage among adult US males. Communication Research, 41, 665–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K., Hamburger, M., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. (2011). X-rated material and perpetration of sexually aggressive behavior among children and adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1–18. doi:10.1002/ab.20367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness, and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, 32, 10–21. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb02514.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Effects of prolonged consumption of pornography on family values. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 518–544. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb02514.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Media SchoolIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations