Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1343–1353 | Cite as

Sociosexual Attitudes and Dyadic Sexual Desire Independently Predict Women’s Preferences for Male Vocal Masculinity

  • Jillian J. M. O’ConnorEmail author
  • Benedict C. Jones
  • Paul J. Fraccaro
  • Cara C. Tigue
  • Katarzyna Pisanski
  • David R. Feinberg
Original Paper


Research suggests that the desire to behave sexually with a partner (dyadic sexual desire) may reflect desire for intimacy whereas solitary sexual desire may reflect pleasure seeking motivations more generally. Because direct reproductive success can only be increased with a sexual partner, we tested whether dyadic sexual desire was a better predictor of women’s preferences for lower pitched men’s voices (a marker of relatively high reproductive success) than was solitary sexual desire. In Study 1, women (N = 95) with higher dyadic sexual desire scores on the Sexual Desire Inventory-2 preferred masculinized male voices more than did women with lower dyadic sexual desire scores. We did not find a significant relationship between women’s vocal masculinity preferences and their solitary sexual desire scores. In Study 2, we tested whether the relationship between voice preferences and dyadic sexual desire scores was related to differences in sociosexual orientation. Women (N = 80) with more positive attitudes towards uncommitted sex had stronger vocal masculinity preferences regardless of whether men’s attractiveness was judged for short-term or long-term relationships. Independent of the effect of sociosexual attitudes, dyadic sexual desire positively predicted women’s masculinity preferences when assessing men’s attractiveness for short-term but not long-term relationships. These effects were independent of women’s own relationship status and hormonal contraceptive use. Our results provide further evidence that women’s mate preferences may independently reflect individual differences in both sexual desire and openness to short-term relationships, potentially with the ultimate function of maximizing the fitness benefits of women’s mate choices.


Sex drive Testosterone Fundamental frequency Mate choice Attractiveness 


  1. Abitbol, J., Abitbol, P., & Abitbol, B. (1999). Sex hormones and the female voice. Journal of Voice, 13, 424–446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvergne, A., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L., & Feinberg, D. R. (2009). Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1077–1082.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Apicella, C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biology Letters, 3, 682–684.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J., & Graham, C. A. (2011). The varied nature of women’s sexuality: Unresolved issues and a theoretical approach. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 717–729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodenmann, G., Atkins, D. C., Schar, M., & Poffet, V. (2010). The association between daily stress and sexual activity. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 271–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, A., & Dabbs, J. M. (1993). Testosterone and men’s marriages. Social Forces, 72, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brotto, L. A., & Yule, M. A. (2011). Physiological and subjective sexual arousal in self-identified asexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 699–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrows, L. J., Basha, M., & Goldstein, A. T. (2012). The effects of hormonal contraceptives on female sexuality: A review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 2213–2223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell Hooper, A. E., Gangestad, S. W., Emery Thompson, M., & Bryan, A. D. (2011). Testosterone and romance: The association of testosterone with relationship commitment and satisfaction in heterosexual men and women. American Journal of Human Biology, 23, 553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60, 773–780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, S. A., & Missing, C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 65, 997–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dabbs, J. M., & Mallinger, A. (1999). High testosterone levels predict low voice pitch among men. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamond, L. M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans, S., Neave, N., Wakelin, D., & Hamilton, C. (2008). The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiology & Behavior, 93, 783–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feely, R. J., Saad, F., Guay, A., & Traish, A. M. (2009). Testosterone in men’s health: A new role for an old hormone. Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value? Evolutionary Anthropology, 17, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Little, A. C. (2008a). Correlated preferences for men’s facial and vocal masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., O’Connor, J. J. M., & Tigue, C. C. (2012). Women’s self-perceived health and attractiveness predict their male vocal masculinity preferences in different directions across short- and long-term relationship contexts. Behavavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 66, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008b). The relative role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception, 37, 615–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., O’Connor, J. J. M., Tigue, C. C., & Borak, D. J. (2011). Integrating fundamental and formant frequencies in women’s preferences for men’s voices. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 1320–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 82–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, A. D., Corona, G., Bandini, E., Mannucci, E., Lotti, F., Boddi, V., et al. (2009). Psychobiological correlates of extramarital affairs and differences between stable and occasional infidelity among men with sexual dysfunctions. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 866–875.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gangestad, S. W., Merriman, L. A., & Thompson, M. E. (2010). Men’s oxidative stress, fluctuating asymmetry and physical attractiveness. Animal Behaviour, 80, 1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Glassenberg, A. N., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010). Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1289–1296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray, P., Parkin, J., & Sammsvaughan, M. (2007). Hormonal correlates of human paternal interactions: A hospital-based investigation in urban Jamaica. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 499–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heiman, J. R., Rupp, H., Janssen, E., Newhouse, S. K., Brauer, M., & Laan, E. (2011). Sexual desire, sexual arousal and hormonal differences in premenopausal US and Dutch women with and without low sexual desire. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 772–779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Different vocal parameters predict perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Human Nature, 21, 406–427.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hollien, H. (1960). Some laryngeal correlates of vocal pitch. Journal of Speech and Hearing, 3, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, B. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Feinberg, D. R., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010a). Age at menarche predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculinized male voices in adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 860–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Law Smith, M. J. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 78–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Vukovic, J. (2010b). A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 79, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Watkins, C. D., Welling, L. L. M., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011a). Reported sexual desire predicts men’s preferences for sexually dimorphic cues in women’s faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1281–1285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, B. C., Vukovic, J., Little, A. C., Roberts, S. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011b). Circum-menopausal changes in women’s perferences for sexually dimorphic shape cues in peer-aged faces. Biological Psychology, 87, 453–455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. King, B. E., & Allgeier, E. R. (2000). The sexual desire inventory as a measure of sexual motivation in college students. Psychological Reports, 86, 347–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kruger, D. J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United states: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lippa, R. A. (2006). Is high sex drive associated with increased sexual attraction to both sexes? It depends on whether you are male or female. Psychological Science, 17, 46–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lippa, R. A. (2007). The relation between sex drive and sexual attraction to men and women: A cross-national study of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 209–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Little, A. C., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Variation in facial masculinity and symmetry preferences across the menstrual cycle is moderated by relationship context. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 999–1008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1095–1100.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Little, A. C., Saxton, T. K., Roberts, S. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Vukovic, J., et al. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 912–920.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., O’Rourke, M. T., et al. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men’s testosterone levels-but not always: The moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 642–651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Meana, M. (2010). Elucidating women’s (hetero)sexual desire: Definitional challenges and content expansion. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 104–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Connor, J. J. M., Fraccaro, P. J., & Feinberg, D. R. (2012). The influence of male voice pitch on women’s perceptions of relationship investment. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Connor, J. J. M., Re, D. E., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 64–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1255–1266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Testosterone is associated with mating success but not attractiveness or masculinity in human males. Animal Behaviour, 76, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pillsworth, E. G., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 55–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pisanski, K., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. Cross-Cultural Research, 47, 162–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Provost, M. P., Kormos, C., Kosakoski, G., & Quinsey, V. L. (2006). Sociosexuality in women and preference for facial masculinization and somatotype in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 305–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Provost, M. P., Troje, N. F., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Short-term mating strategies and attraction to masculinity in point-light walkers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Puts, D. A., Apicella, C. L., & Cárdenas, R. A. (2012a). Masculine voices signal men’s threat potential in forager and industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 601–609.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Puts, D. A., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2012b). Sexual selection on human faces and voices. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 227–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Puts, D. A., & Pope, L. E. (2013). Moderators, mates, and matchmakers: Effects of oral contraceptives on sexual desire may also depend on partners’ behavior and the role of female choice [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1379–1380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Quist, M., Watkins, C. D., Smith, F. G., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Sociosexuality predicts women’s preferences for symmetry in men’s faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1415–1421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rantala, M. J., Coetzee, V., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Kecko, S., Krama, T., et al. (2013). Adiposity, compared with masculinity, serves as a more valid cue to immunocompetence in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, 2012–2495.Google Scholar
  67. Rantala, M. J., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Krama, T., Kivleniece, I., Kecko, S., et al. (2012). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans. Nature Communications, 3, 694.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, S93–S95.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Roberts, S. C., Cobey, K. D., Klapilová, K., & Havlíček, J. (2013). An evolutionary approach offers a fresh perspective on the relationship between oral contraception and sexual desire [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1369–1375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Roney, J. R., Hanson, K. N., Durante, K. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men’s faces: women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 2169–2175.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Sacco, D. F., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2012). The roles of sociosexual orientation and relationship status in women’s face preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 1044–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schaffir, J. (2006). Hormonal contraception and sexual desire: A critical review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 305–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 870–883.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, F. G., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Vukovic, J., et al. (2009). Hormonal contraceptive use and perceptions of trust modulate the effect of relationship context on women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability and parasitic infections in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tranmüller, H. (1990). Analytical expressions for the Tonotopic Sensory Scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van Anders, S. M. (2010). Gonadal steroids and salivary IgA in healthy young women and men. American Journal of Human Biology, 22, 348–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. van Anders, S. M. (2012). Testosterone and sexual desire in healthy women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1471–1484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. van Anders, S. M., Brotto, L., Farrell, J., & Yule, M. (2009). Associations among physiological and subjective sexual response, sexual desire, and salivary steroid hormones in healthy premenopausal women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 739–751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. van Anders, S. M., & Goldey, K. L. (2010). Testosterone and partnering are linked via relationship status for women and ‘relationship orientation’ for men. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 820–826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Waynforth, D., Delwadia, S., & Camm, M. (2005). The influence of women’s mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2008). Sex drive is positively associated with women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in men’s and women’s faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Conway, C. A., Law Smith, M. J., Little, A. C., et al. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 156–161.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jillian J. M. O’Connor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benedict C. Jones
    • 2
  • Paul J. Fraccaro
    • 1
  • Cara C. Tigue
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Pisanski
    • 1
  • David R. Feinberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & BehaviourMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Institute of Neuroscience and PsychologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations