Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1403–1415

Conservative Christianity, Partnership, Hormones, and Sex in Late Life

Original Paper

Abstract

Using nationally representative data from the 2005–2006 U.S. National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, this study queried relationship, sexual, and sex hormone patterns among married evangelical women and men aged 57–85, relative to those in other religions. Results suggested that despite potentially more unequal gender roles, evangelical older women may have better marital quality, perhaps due to the recent transformation of their male counterparts into authoritative, yet-supportive, “soft patriarchs.” Correspondingly, these women, especially those with greater subjective religiosity or more support from a spouse, reported consistently better sexual outcomes than their counterparts in other religions. In addition, they also had lower estradiol, whether due to psychobiological effects of their better relationships or self-selection of those with differential hormone levels into particular partnership patterns. While older men in these communities also experienced more satisfactory marriages, and had lower androgens (testosterone, DHEA), their relational assets were less uniformly matched by better sexual outcomes, perhaps reflecting a gender disparity in the linkage between these factors.

Keywords

Evangelicals Older adults Marital quality Sexual outcomes Sex hormones NSHAP 

References

  1. Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Variation in testosterone levels and male reproductive effort: Insight from a polygynous human population. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 491–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Avis, N. E., Zhao, X., Johannes, C. B., Ory, M., Brockwell, S., & Greendale, G. A. (2005). Correlates of sexual function among multi-ethnic middle-aged women: Results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause, 12, 385–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 121–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J., Herbenick, D., Barnes, T., Hallam-Jones, R., Wylie, K., Janssen, E., et al. (2005). The relevance of the dual control model to male sexual dysfunction: The Kinsey Institute/BASRT Collaborative Project. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 571–579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartkowski, J. P. (1999). One step forward, one step back: “Progressive traditionalism” and the negotiation of domestic labor in evangelical families. Gender Issues, 17, 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartkowski, J. P. (2001). Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bartkowski, J. P., Wilcox, W. B., & Ellison, C. G. (2000). Charting the paradoxes of evangelical family life: Gender and parenting in conservative Protestant households. Family Ministry, 14, 9–21.Google Scholar
  11. Basson, R. (2001). Human sex-response cycles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 33–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Basson, R. (2005). Women’s sexual dysfunction: Revised and expanded definitions. Candian Medical Association Journal, 172, 1327–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Basson, R. (2008). Women’s sexual function and dysfunction: Current uncertainties, future directions. International Journal of Impotence Research, 20, 466–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Basson, R., Althof, S., Davis, S., Fugl-Meyer, K., Goldstein, I., Leiblum, S., et al. (2004). Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1, 24–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Basson, R., Berman, J., Burnett, A., Derogatis, L., Ferguson, D., Fourcroy, J., et al. (2000). Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications. Journal of Urology, 163, 888–893.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blanchard, K., Goyer, T., & Hodges, P. (2013). Lead your family like Jesus: Powerful parenting principles from the creator of families. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House.Google Scholar
  18. Bogaert, A. F., & Fisher, W. A. (1995). Predictors of university men’s number of sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & McKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Das, A., Laumann, E. O., & Waite, L. J. (2012). Sexual expression over the life course: Results from three landmark surveys. In J. DeLamater & L. Carpenter (Eds.), Sex for life: From virginity to Viagra, how sexuality changes throughout our lives (pp. 236–259). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dennerstein, L., Dudley, E., & Burger, H. (2001). Are changes in sexual functioning during midlife due to aging or menopause? Fertility and Sterility, 76, 456–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dennerstein, L., Randolph, J., Taffe, J., Dudley, E., & Burger, H. (2002). Hormones, mood, sexuality, and the menopausal transition. Fertility and Sterility, 77, S42–S48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., & Hackett, G. I. (1999). Association of sexual problems with social, psychological, and physical problems in men and women: A cross sectional population survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 144–148.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Durante, K. M., & Li, N. P. (2009). Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women. Biology Letters, 5, 179–182.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Anderson, K. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment and gender. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. Erickson, R. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gallagher, S. (2003). Evangelical identity and gendered family life. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gavrilova, N., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Salivary sex hormone measurement in a national, population-based study of older adults. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i94–i105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giles, K. R., & McCabe, M. P. (2009). Conceptualizing women’s sexual function: Linear vs. circular models of sexual response. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2761–2771.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Glass, J., & Jacobs, J. (2005). Childhood religious conservatism and adult attainment among black and white women. Social Forces, 84, 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Granger, D. A., Kivlighan, K. T., Fortunato, C., Harmon, A. G., Hibel, L. C., Schwartz, et al. (2007). Integration of salivary biomarkers into developmental and behaviorally-oriented research: Problems and solutions for collecting specimens. Physiology & Behavior, 92, 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gray, P. B. (2003). Marriage, parenting, and testosterone variation among Kenyan Swahili men. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 122, 279–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74, 1029–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hegstrom, P. (2004). Angry men and the women who love them: Breaking the cycle of physical and emotional abuse. Kansas City, KS: Beacon Hill Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  39. Hunter, J. D. (1987). Evangelicalism: The coming generation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Keller, T. (2011). The meaning of marriage: Facing the complexities of commitment with the wisdom of God. New York: Dutton Adult.Google Scholar
  41. King, M., Holt, V., & Nazareth, I. (2007). Women’s views of their sexual difficulties: Agreement and disagreement with clinical diagnoses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 281–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Laumann, E. O., Das, A., & Waite, L. J. (2008). Sexual dysfunction among older adults: Prevalence and risk factors from a nationally representative U.S. probability sample of men and women 57-85 years of age. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 2300–2311.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Leiblum, S. (2001). Critical overview of the new consensus classifications and definitions of female sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 159–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindau, S. T., Schumm, L. P., Laumann, E. O., Levinson, W., O’Muircheartaigh, C. A., & Waite, L. J. (2007). A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 762–774.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lue, T., Basson, R., Rosen, R., Guiliano, F., Khoury, S., & Montorsi, F. (2004). Sexual medicine: Sexual dysfunction in men and women. Paris: Health Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. McCabe, M., Althof, S. E., Assalian, P., Chevret-Measson, M., Leiblum, S. R., Simonelli, C., et al. (2010). Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 327–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. McCartney, B., Trent, J. T., & Smalley, G. (1992). What makes a man?: Twelve promises that will change your life!. Colorado Springs, CO: Navpress Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  49. McQuillan, J., & Ferree, M. M. (1998). The importance of variation among men and the benefits of feminism for families. In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? (pp. 213–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller, D. E. (1997). Reinventing American Protestantism: Christianity in the new millennium. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Niebuhr, G. (1998, June 10). Southern Baptists declare wife should ‘submit’ to her husband. New York Times.Google Scholar
  53. Nock, S. L. (2001). The marriages of equally dependent spouses. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 755–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Muircheartaigh, C., Eckman, S., & Smith, S. (2009). Statistical design and estimation for the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i12–i19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Testosterone is associated with mating success but not attractiveness or masculinity in human males. Animal Behaviour, 76, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pinckney, C. (1997). What is Christian marriage? (sermon) Community Bible Church: Williamstown, MA. Retrieved from http://tcpiii.tripod.com/marriage2.htm
  57. Pitkin, J., & Rees, M. (2008). Urogenital atrophy. Menopause International, 14, 136–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pollet, T. V., der Meij, L. V., Cobey, K. D., & Buunk, A. P. (2011). Testosterone levels and their associations with lifetime number of opposite sex partners and remarriage in a large sample of American elderly men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 72–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Qato, D. M., Schumm, L. P., Johnson, M., Mihai, A., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Medication data collection and coding in a home-based survey of older adults. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i86–i93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 14–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Roney, J. R., Simmons, Z. L., & Gray, P. B. (2011). Changes in estradiol predict within-women shifts in attraction to facial cues of men’s testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 742–749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Roof, W. C. (1993). A generation of seekers: The spiritual journeys of the Baby Boom generation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  63. Rosen, R. C., & Laumann, E. O. (2003). The prevalence of sexual problems in women: How valid are comparisons across studies? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 209–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, S., Jaszczak, A., Graber, J., Lundeen, K., Leitsch, S., Wargo, E., et al. (2009). Instrument development, study design implementation, and survey conduct for the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i20–i29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spalding, J. D. (1996). Bonding in the bleachers: A visit to the Promise Keepers. The Christian Century, 113, 260–265.Google Scholar
  68. Stata Corp. (2011). STATA Release 12.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  69. Shibley, M. A. (1996). Resurgent evangelicalism in the United States: Mapping cultural change since 1970. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Waite, L. J., Laumann, E. O., Das, A., & Schumm, L. P. (2009). Sexuality: Measures of partnerships, practices, attitudes, and problems in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Study. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i56–i66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilcox, W. B. (1998). Conservative protestant childrearing: Authoritarian or authoritative? American Sociological Review, 63, 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilcox, W. B. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wilcox, W. B. (2006). Religion and the domestication of men. Contexts, 5, 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1321–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilcox, W. B., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2007). Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Social Science Research, 36, 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilcox, W. B., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2008). Living and loving “decent”: Religion and relationship quality among urban parents. Social Science Research, 37, 828–843.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams, S. R., Pham-Kanter, G., & Leitsch, S. A. (2009). Measures of chronic conditions and diseases associated with aging in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i67–i75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., Jr, & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolfinger, N. H., & Wilcox, W. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86, 1311–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wylie, K., Rees, M., Hackett, G., Anderson, R., Bouloux, P.-M., Cust, M., et al. (2010). Androgens, health and sexuality in women and men. Human Fertility, 13, 277–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yerkovich, M., & Yerkovich, K. (2008). How we love: A revolutionary approach to deeper connections in marriage. Colorado Springs, CO: WaterBrook Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations