Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 1165–1176 | Cite as

The Invisible Stereotypes of Bisexual Men

  • Alon ZivonyEmail author
  • Thalma Lobel
Original Paper


Bisexual men have little public visibility, yet previous reports indicate that heterosexuals have specific prejudicial attitudes towards them. This article reports on two studies that examined the stereotypical beliefs of heterosexual men and women regarding bisexual men. In Study 1 (n = 88), we examined awareness of social stereotypes (stereotype knowledge). Most of the participants were unable to describe the various stereotypes of bisexual men. Contrary to previous studies, low-prejudiced participants had more stereotype knowledge than high-prejudiced participants. In Study 2 (n = 232), we examined prejudice in a contextual evaluation task that required no stereotype knowledge. Participants evaluated a single target character on a first date: a bisexual man dating a heterosexual woman, a bisexual man dating a gay man, a heterosexual man dating a heterosexual woman, or a gay man dating a gay man. The findings indicated that participants implemented stereotypical beliefs in their evaluation of bisexual men: compared to heterosexual and gay men, bisexual men were evaluated as more confused, untrustworthy, open to new experiences, as well as less inclined towards monogamous relationships and not as able to maintain a long-term relationship. Overall, the two studies suggest that the stereotypical beliefs regarding bisexual men are prevalent, but often not acknowledged as stereotypes. In addition, the implementation of stereotypes in the evaluations was shown to be dependent on the potential romantic partner of the target. Possible theoretical explanations and implications are discussed.


Bisexuality Stereotypes Prejudice Sexual orientation 



We thank William Fisher and Dominique Lamy for their useful feedback on earlier versions of the article.


  1. Augoustinos, M., Ahrens, C., & Innes, M. J. (1994). Stereotypes and prejudice: The Australian experience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 125–141. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01014.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, M. (2007). Heteronormativity and the exclusion of bisexuality in psychology. In V. Clarke & E. Peel (Eds.), Out in psychology: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer perspectives (pp. 86–118). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Berscheid, E., & Peplau, L. A. (1983). The emerging science of close relationships. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 20–67). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, T. (2000). Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 521–527. doi: 10.3758/BF03200824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, S., David, S., & Shelly, C. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 262–275. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  7. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eliason, M. J. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 317–326. doi: 10.1023/A:1024527032040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox, A. (1991). Development of a bisexual identity: Understanding the process. In L. Hutchins & L. Kaahumanu (Eds.), Bi any other name: Bisexual people speak out (pp. 29–39). Boston: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordijn, E. H., Koomen, W., & Stapel, D. A. (2001). Level of prejudice in relation to knowledge of cultural stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 150–157. doi: 10.1006/jesp. 2000.1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999). Psychological sequelae of hate crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 945–951. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.67.6.945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Huebner, D. M., Rebchook, G. M., & Kegeles, S. M. (2004). Experiences of harassment, discrimination, and physical violence among young gay and bisexual men. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1200–1203. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.7.1200.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Israel, T., & Mohr, J. (2004). Attitudes towards bisexual women and men: Current research, future directions. In R. Fox (Ed.), Current research on bisexuality (pp. 119–134). New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  17. Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Simultaneous comparisons and the control of type I errors. In G. Keppel (Ed.), Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (pp. 111–130). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. King, M., McKeown, E., Warner, J., Ramsay, A., Johnson, K., Cart, C., et al. (2003). Mental health and quality of life of gay men and lesbians in England and Wales: Controlled, cross-sectional study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 552–558. doi: 10.1192/03-207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Klohnen, E. C., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive—Self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity, or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709–722. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M. R., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Cooper, M. (2004). Psychological research online. American Psychologist, 59, 105–117. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Krueger, J. (1996). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 536–548.Google Scholar
  22. Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theory of stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275–287. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McLean, K. (2007). Hiding in the closet? Bisexuals, coming out and the disclosure imperative. Journal of Sociology, 43, 151–166. doi: 10.1177/1440783307076893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, M., Andre, A., Ebin, J., & Bessonova, L. (2007). Bisexual health: An introduction and model practices for HIV/STI prevention programming. New York: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute, The Fenway Institute at Fenway Community Health and BiNet USA.Google Scholar
  27. Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ochs, R. (1996). Biphobia: It goes more than two ways. In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 217–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Paul, J. P., & Nichols, M. (1988). “Biphobia” and the construction of a bisexual identity. In M. Shernoff & W. Scott (Eds.), The sourcebook on lesbian/gay health care (pp. 142–147). Washington, DC: National Lesbian and Gay Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Rubinstein, T., Makov, S., & Sarel, A. (2013). Don’t bi-negative: Reduction of negative attitudes toward bisexuals by blurring the gender dichotomy. Journal of Bisexuality, 13, 356–373. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2013.813419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rust, P. C. (1993). Neutralizing the political threat of the marginal woman: Lesbians’ beliefs about bisexual women. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 214–228. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rust, P. C. (2002). Bisexuality: The state of the union. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 180–240. doi: 10.1080/10532528.2002.10559805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Spalding, L. R., & Peplau, L. A. (1997). The unfaithful lover: Heterosexuals’ perceptions of bisexuals and their relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 611–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steinman, E. (2000). Interpreting the invisibility of male bisexuality: Theories, interaction, politics. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 15–45. doi: 10.1300/J159v01n02_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Udis-Kessler, A. (1996). Challenging the stereotypes. In Off Pink Collective (Ed.), Bisexual horizons: Politics, histories, lives (pp. 45–57). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  37. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual attraction: Understanding bisexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 245–276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Yost, M. R., & Thomas, G. D. (2011). Gender and binegativity: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward male and female bisexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 691–702. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9767-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zinik, G. (1985). Identity conflict or adaptive flexibility? Bisexuality reconsidered. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 7–20. doi: 10.1300/J082v11n01_02.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychological SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations