Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 67–79 | Cite as

Viewing Child Pornography: Prevalence and Correlates in a Representative Community Sample of Young Swedish Men

  • Michael C. SetoEmail author
  • Chantal A. Hermann
  • Cecilia Kjellgren
  • Gisela Priebe
  • Carl Göran Svedin
  • Niklas Långström
Original Paper

Abstract

Most research on child pornography use has been based on selected clinical or criminal justice samples; risk factors for child pornography use in the general population remain largely unexplored. In this study, we examined prevalence, risk factors, and correlates of viewing depictions of adult–child sex in a population-representative sample of 1,978 young Swedish men (17–20 years, Mdn = 18 years, overall response rate, 77 %). In an anonymous, school-based survey, participants self-reported sexual coercion experiences, attitudes and beliefs about sex, perceived peer attitudes, and sexual interests and behaviors; including pornography use, sexual interest in children, and sexually coercive behavior. A total of 84 (4.2 %) young men reported they had ever viewed child pornography. Most theory-based variables were moderately and significantly associated with child pornography viewing and were consistent with models of sexual offending implicating both antisociality and sexual deviance. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, 7 of 15 tested factors independently predicted child pornography viewing and explained 42 % of the variance: ever had sex with a male, likely to have sex with a child aged 12–14, likely to have sex with a child 12 or less, perception of children as seductive, having friends who have watched child pornography, frequent pornography use, and ever viewed violent pornography. From these, a 6-item Child Pornography Correlates Scale was constructed and then cross-validated in a similar but independent Norwegian sample.

Keywords

Child pornography use Antisociality Sexual deviance Sex offenders against children 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Swedish survey was funded by the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs and the Norwegian survey was funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Child and Family Affairs. The research network that conducted the Baltic Sea Regional Study on Adolescent Sexuality was funded by the Norwegian Research Council. Niklas Långström was funded by the Swedish Research Council. We thank Dr. Svein Mossige for access to the Norwegian data used to cross-validate our Child Pornography Correlates Scale. The authors have no financial interests to disclose regarding this study.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. (2009). Missing data. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–90). London, England: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Hermann, C. A. (2011). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 92–123. doi: 10.1177/1079063210370708.Google Scholar
  5. Baines, V. (2008, November). Online child sexual abuse: The law enforcement response. Paper presented at the Third World Congress of ECPAT International, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.ecpat.net/worldcongressIII/PDF/Publications/ICT_Law/Thematic_Paper_ICTLAW_ENG.pdf
  6. Bates, A., & Metcalf, C. (2007). A psychometric comparison of Internet and non-Internet sex offenders from a community treatment sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 11–20. doi: 10.1080/13552600701365654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R., Kolla, N. J., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 285–309. doi: 10.1007/s11194-007-9049-0
  8. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Eke, A. W., Seto, M. C., & Williams, J. (2011). Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: An extended prospective follow-up study. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 466–478. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9252-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Forsman, M., Santtila, P., Johansson, A., Sandnabba, K., & Långström, N. (2013). Childhood maltreatment and risk of sexual and non-sexual violent behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard International Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grann, M., & Långström, N. (2007). Actuarial assessment of violence risk: To weigh or not to weigh? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 22–36. doi: 10.1177/0093854806290250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jenkins, P. (2001). Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jespersen, A. F., Lalumière, M. L., & Seto, M. C. (2009). Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kjellgren, C., Priebe, G., Svedin, C. G., & Långström, N. (2010). Sexually coercive behavior in male youth: Population survey of general and specific risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1161–1169. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9572-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lalumière, M. L., Chalmers, L. J., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318. doi: 10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00076-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in the male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Långström, N., & Hanson, R. K. (2006). High rates of sexual behavior in the general population: Correlates and predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 37–52. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-8993-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipsey, M., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. E. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Motivans, M., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2007). Federal prosecution of child sex exploitation offenders, 2006. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin (Report No. NCJ 219412). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. Neutze, J., Seto, M. C., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., & Beier, K. M. (2011). Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 212–242. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043.Google Scholar
  26. Ray, J. V., Kimonis, E. R., & Seto, M. C. (2013). Correlates and moderators of child pornography consumption in a community sample. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1177/1079063213502678.
  27. Riegel, D. L. (2004). Effects on boy-attracted pedosexual males of viewing boy erotica [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 321–323. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000029071.89455.53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Chacón-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8, 448–467. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seto, M. C. (2010). Child pornography use and Internet solicitation in the diagnosis of pedophilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 591–593. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9603-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Seto, M. C. (2013). Internet sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 610–615. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Seto, M. C., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2011). Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 124–145. doi: 10.1177/1079063210369013.Google Scholar
  34. Seto, M. C., Kjellgren, C., Priebe, G., Mossige, S., Svedin, C. G., & Långström, N. (2010a). Sexual coercion experience and sexually coercive behavior: A population study of Swedish and Norwegian male youth. Child Maltreatment, 15, 219–228. doi: 10.1177/1077559510367937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Seto, M. C., & Lalumière, M. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations using meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 526–575. doi: 10.1037/a0019700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Seto, M. C., Reeves, L., & Jung, S. (2010b). Explanations given by child pornography offenders for their crimes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 169–180. doi: 10.1080/13552600903572396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siegfried, K. C., Lovely, R. W., & Rogers, M. K. (2008). Self-reported online child pornography behavior: A psychological analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2, 286–297.Google Scholar
  38. Steel, C. M. (2009). Child pornography in peer-to-peer networks. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 560–568. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Svedin, C. G., Åkerman, I., & Priebe, G. (2011). Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 779–788. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Uppsala kommun. (2005). Uppsala kommun utvärderingsenheten. Utvärdering av elevers frånvaro i gymnasieskolan i Uppsala kommun [The evaluation unit of the Uppsala local authority: 2005:6. Evaluation of students’ absence from high school in Uppsala]. Retrieved http://www.uppsala.se; Accessed March 6, 2007.
  42. Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  43. Whitaker, D. J., Le, B., Hanson, R. K., Baker, C. K., McMahon, P. M., Ryan, G., Klein, A., & Rice, D. D. (2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 529–548. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.005
  44. Wolak, J. (2011, October). What we know (and don’t know) about Internet sex offenders. Plenary presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Handout from http://www.atsa.com/sites/default/files/ConfHO2011Wolak.pdf
  45. Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Child pornography possessors arrested in internet-related crimes: Findings from the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (Report CV81). Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael C. Seto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chantal A. Hermann
    • 2
  • Cecilia Kjellgren
    • 3
  • Gisela Priebe
    • 3
    • 4
  • Carl Göran Svedin
    • 5
  • Niklas Långström
    • 6
  1. 1.Integrated Forensic ProgramRoyal Ottawa Health Care GroupBrockvilleCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Social WorkLinnaeus UniversityKalmarSweden
  4. 4.Department of Clinical SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
  5. 5.Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  6. 6.Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations