Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 99–106 | Cite as

Sexual Partnerships and Considerations for HIV Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Utilization Among High-Risk Substance Using Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • Matthew J. Mimiaga
  • Elizabeth F. Closson
  • Vishesh Kothary
  • Jennifer A. Mitty
Special Section: Sexual Health in Gay and Bisexual Male Couples

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) remain at great risk of HIV in the United States, representing 65 % of incident HIV infections. One factor contributing to the high rate of HIV infection among MSM is use of “recreational” drugs that are highly associated with unprotected anal sex. Pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PrEP) is a novel biomedical HIV prevention strategy that has the potential to reduce HIV transmission in MSM. Main and casual sex partners play a role in HIV prevention efforts for MSM. The study aimed to qualitatively explore the perceived influences of sexual relationships on promoting and inhibiting PrEP use among high-risk MSM who report regular drug use. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 participants recruited in Boston, Massachusetts. Data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis. Casual partners presented a distinct set of concerns from primary partnerships. MSM generally viewed main partners as a potential source of support for taking PrEP. Given their informal and often temporary nature, PrEP disclosure to casual partners was considered unnecessary. HIV-related stigma and substance use were also perceived as barriers to discussing PrEP use with casual partners. MSM articulated a high degree of personal agency regarding their ability to take PrEP. Findings suggest that behavioral interventions to improve PrEP utilization and adherence for high-risk MSM should be tailored to sex partner type and the parameters established between sex partners. Approaches to PrEP disclosure and partner engagement should be informed by the relative benefits and limitations characterized by these different types of relationships.

Keywords

Men who have sex with men Pre-exposure prophylaxis Sex partners Substance use Sexual orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by grant number R21MH085314-01 (MPIs: Mimiaga and Mitty) from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIMH or the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men—21 cities, United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm5937.pdf.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). HIV Surveillance Report, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_2011_HIV_Surveillance_Report_vol_23.pdf.
  4. Courtenay-Quirk, C., Wolitski, R. J., Parsons, J. T., & Gómez, C. A. (2006). Is HIV/AIDS stigma dividing the gay community? Perceptions of HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 18, 56–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomez, A. M., Beougher, S. C., Chakravarty, D., Neilands, T. B., Mandic, C. G., Darbes, L. A., et al. (2012). Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: Implications for HIV prevention among gay couples. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 1584–1588.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grant, R. M., Lama, J. R., Anderson, P. L., McMahan, V., Liu, A. Y., Vargas, L., et al. (2010). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2587–2599.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Halkitis, P. N., Green, K. A., & Mourgues, P. (2005). Longitudinal investigation of methamphetamine use among gay and bisexual men in New York City: Findings from Project BUMPS. Journal of Urban Health, 82, i18–i25.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Halkitis, P. N., & Parsons, J. T. (2002). Recreational drug use and HIV-risk sexual behavior among men frequenting gay social venues. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services: Issues in Practice, Policy & Research, 14, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinkin, C. H., Barclay, T. R., Castellon, S. A., Levine, A. J., Durvasula, R. S., Marion, S. D., et al. (2007). Drug use and medication adherence among HIV-1 infected individuals. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 185–194.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoff, C. C., & Beougher, S. C. (2010). Sexual agreements among gay male couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 774–787.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jerome, R. C., Halkitis, P. N., & Siconolfi, D. E. (2009). Club drug use, sexual behavior, and HIV seroconversion: A qualitative study of motivations. Substance Use and Misuse, 44, 431–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, M. O., Dilworth, S. E., Taylor, J. M., Darbes, L. A., Comfort, M. L., & Neilands, T. B. (2012). Primary relationships, HIV treatment adherence, and virologic control. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 1511–1521.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz, M., Gerberding, J., & Boswell, S. (1998). Post-sexual exposure prophylaxis: A roundtable discussion. AIDS Clinical Care, 10, 9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Korner, H., Hendry, O., & Kippax, S. (2005). Negotiating risk and social relations in the context of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: Narratives of gay men. Health, Risk & Society, 7, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lightfoot, M., Song, J., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Newman, P. (2005). The influence of partner type and risk status on the sexual behavior of young men who have sex with men Living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38, 61–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mansergh, G., Colfax, G. N., Marks, G., Rader, M., Guzman, R., & Buchbinder, S. (2001). The Circuit Party Men’s Health Survey: Findings and implications for gay and bisexual men. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 953–958.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mansergh, G., Koblin, B. A., McKirnan, D. J., Hudson, S. M., Flores, S. A., Wiegand, R. E., et al. (2010). An intervention to reduce HIV risk behavior of substance-using men who have sex with men: A two-group randomized trial with a nonrandomized third group. PLoS Medicine, 7(8), e1000329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000329.1-9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mattison, A. M., Ross, M. W., Wolfson, T., & Franklin, D. (2001). Circuit party attendance, club drug use, and unsafe sex in gay men. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 119–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell, J. W., Harvey, S. M., Champeau, D., Moskowitz, D. A., & Seal, D. W. (2012). Relationship factors associated with gay male couples’ concordance on aspects of their sexual agreements: Establishment, type, and adherence. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 1560–1569.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Reback, C. J., Larkins, S., & Shoptaw, S. (2003). Methamphetamine abuse as a barrier to HIV medication adherence among gay and bisexual men. AIDS Care, 15, 775–785.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenberg, E. S., Sullivan, P. S., Dinenno, E. A., Salazar, L. F., & Sanchez, T. H. (2011). Number of casual male sexual partners and associated factors among men who have sex with men: Results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system. BMC Public Health, 11, 189.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ross, M. W., Mattison, A. M., & Franklin, D. R., Jr. (2003). Club drugs and sex on drugs are associated with different motivations for gay circuit party attendance in men. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 1173–1183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett-Sheehan, K., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Bonara, L. I., et al. (1997). Reliability and validity of the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): According to the SCID-P. European Psychiatry, 12, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Smit, P. J., Brady, M., Carter, M., Fernandes, R., Lamore, L., Meulbroek, M., et al. (2012). HIV-related stigma within communities of gay men: A literature review. AIDS Care, 24, 405–412.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone, E., Heagerty, P., Vittinghoff, E., Douglas, J. M., Jr, Koblin, B. A., Mayer, K. H., et al. (1999). Correlates of condom failure in a sexually active cohort of men who have sex with men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 20, 495–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sullivan, P. S., Salazar, L., Buchbinder, S., & Sanchez, T. H. (2009). Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS, 23, 1153–1162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vicioso, K. J., Parsons, J. T., Nanin, J. E., Purcell, D. W., & Woods, W. J. (2005). Experiencing release: Sex environments and escapism for HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 13–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolitski, R. J., Jones, K. T., Wasserman, J. L., & Smith, J. C. (2006). Self-identification as “down low” among men who have sex with men (MSM) from 12 US cities. AIDS and Behavior, 10, 519–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Mimiaga
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Elizabeth F. Closson
    • 3
  • Vishesh Kothary
    • 3
  • Jennifer A. Mitty
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Behavioral Medicine Service, Department of PsychiatryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.The Fenway InstituteFenway HealthBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Infectious DiseasesBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations