Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 273–284 | Cite as

Sexual Assault as a Crime Against Young People

Original Paper

Abstract

Evidence based on almost 300,000 sexual assaults from the National Incident-Based Reporting System showed that the modal age of victims was 15 years, regardless of the age of the offender, the gender of the offender, or the gender of the victim. We suggest that adolescents have the highest risk of victimization because of their sexual attractiveness, vulnerability, and exposure to motivated offenders. As a result of these factors, sexual assault is as much an offense against young people as it is against women. The sexual attractiveness of young people also has implications for the age of offenders. Older men have much higher rates of offending than one would expect, given the age–desistance relationship. Thus, we found that older men have much higher rates of sexual assault than physical assault. Finally, evidence suggested that homosexual men were at least as likely as heterosexual men to commit sexual assault. The pattern suggests that the tendency for sexual assaults to involve male offenders and female victims reflects male sexuality rather than attitudes toward women.

Keywords

Sexual assault Adolescents Evolutionary theory Routine activities Age 

References

  1. Ageton, S. S. (1983). Sexual assault among adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography, 37, 139–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogaert, A. F., Turkovich, D. A., & Hafer, C. L. (1993). A content analysis of Playboy centerfolds from 1953 through 1990: Changes in explicitness, objectification, and model’s age. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Granger, D. A. (1999). Testosterone and men’s health. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 1–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Bryden, D. P., & Grier, M. M. (2011). Criminology: The search for rapists’ “real” motives. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 171–278.Google Scholar
  12. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011, June). American Time Use Survey–2010 results. Bureau of Labor Statistics News Release.Google Scholar
  13. Burrows, K. (2013). Age preferences in dating advertisements by homosexuals and heterosexuals: From sociobiological to sociological explanations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 203–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clement, F. J. (1974). Longitudinal and cross-sectional assessments of age changes in physical strength as related to sex, social class, and mental ability. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 423–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Edlund, L., & Korn, E. (2002). A theory of prostitution. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis, L. (1989). Theories of rape: Inquiries into the causes of sexual aggression. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  20. Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychology approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Sex and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  22. Felson, M. (1998). Crime and everyday life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  23. Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Felson, R. B. (2010). Academic apartheid: Segregation in the study of partner violence. Partner Abuse, 1, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Felson, R. B., & Cundiff, P. (2012). Age and sexual assault during robberies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Felson, R. B., Cundiff, P., & Painter-Davis, N. (2012). Age and sexual assault in correctional facilities: A blocked opportunity approach. Criminology, 50, 887–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Felson, R. B., & Krohn, M. (1990). Motives for rape. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 222–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Felson, R. B., & Paré, P. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, M. B. (1994). Growing old gracefully: Age concealment and gender. Journal of Gerontology, 49, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hart, T. C., & Rennison, C. (2003, March). Reporting crime to the police, 1992–2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.Google Scholar
  32. Hayes, A. F. (1995). Age preferences for same- and opposite-sex partners. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 125–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Henss, R. (2006). Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 933–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., & McManus, T. J. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Justice Research and Statistical Association. (2012). Data quality. Retrieved from http://www.jrsa.org/ibrrc/using-data/data_quality.shtml.
  37. Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaufman, G., & Phua, V. C. (2003). Ageism alive in date selection among men? Age requests among gay and straight men in internet personal ads. Journal of Men’s Studies, 11, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1166–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kimmel, M. (2003). An unnatural history of rape. In C. B. Travis (Ed.), Evolution, gender, and rape (pp. 221–234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lalumiere, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male proclivity for sexual assault. Washington, DC: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mann, R. E., & Hollin, C. R. (2007). Sexual offenders’ explanations for their offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mathes, E. W., Brennan, S. M., Haugen, P. M., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Ratings of physical attractiveness as a function of age. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 157–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mathews, A. M., Bancroft, J. H. J., & Slater, P. (1972). The principal components of sexual preference. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mesnick, S. L. (1997). Sexual alliances: Evidence and evolutionary implications. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 207–260). New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mezey, G., & King, M. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. Psychological Medicine, 19, 205–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Montoye, H. J., & Lamphiear, D. E. (1977). Grip and arm strength in males and females, age 10 to 69. Research Quarterly, 48, 109–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Palmer, C. T. (1988). Twelve reasons why rape is not sexually motivated: A skeptical examination. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 512–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Palmer, C. T. (1991). Human rape: Adaptation or by-product? Journal of Sex Research, 28, 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pino, N. W., & Meier, R. F. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles, 40, 979–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schäfer, S. (1977). Sociosexual behavior in male and female homosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8, 385–393.Google Scholar
  59. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmitt, D. P., Jonason, P. K., Byerley, G. J., Flores, S. D., Illbeck, B. E., O’Leary, K. N., & Qudrat, A. (2012). A reexamination of sex differences in sexuality: New studies reveal old truths. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shackelford, T. K. (2002). Are young women the special targets of rape-murder? Aggressive Behavior, 28, 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shields, W. M., & Shields, L. M. (1983). Forcible rape: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Siegel, J. M., Sorenson, S. B., Golding, J. M., Burnam, M. A., & Stein, J. A. (1987). The prevalence of childhood sexual assault: The Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126, 1141–1153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Silverthorne, Z. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2000). Sexual partner age preferences of homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 67–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Spivack, A. L. (2011). Sexual violence: Beyond the feminist-evolutionary debate. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Sternbach, H. (1998). Age-associated testosterone decline in men: Clinical issues for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1310–1318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of human sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. (1997). The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 243–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. (1998). Sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Travis, C. B. (2003). Evolution, gender, and rape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Warr, M. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weiss, K. G. (2010). Male sexual victimization: Examining men’s experiences of rape and sexual assault. Men and Masculinities, 12, 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Scheib, J. (1997). Femicide: An evolutionary psychological perspective. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 431–465). New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Crime, Law, and JusticePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations