Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 1517–1524 | Cite as

Effects of a Tattoo on Men’s Behavior and Attitudes Towards Women: An Experimental Field Study

Original Paper

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated negative evaluations of women with tattoos. However, a study by Swami and Furnham (2007) showed that tattooed women were rated as less physically attractive but more sexually promiscuous. Given that men interpret women’s sexual intent according to their physical appearance, we predicted that women with tattoos would be more favorably approached by men. A temporary tattoo was placed on confederates’ lower back, or not, and all confederates were instructed to read a book while lying flat on their stomach on a well-known beach. Two experiments were conducted. The first experiment showed that more men (N = 220) approached the tattooed confederates and that the mean latency of their approach was quicker. A second experiment showed that men (N = 440) estimated to have more chances to have a date and to have sex on the first date with tattooed confederates. However, the level of physical attractiveness attributed to the confederate was not influenced by the tattoo condition. These results were discussed with respect to men’s possible misinterpretation of women wearing tattoos and the risks associated with this misinterpretation.

Keywords

Tattoo Women Physical attractiveness Sexual stereotypes 

References

  1. Abbey, A. (1987). Misperception of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, M. L. (1991). Career-oriented women with tattoos. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23, 215–230.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, S. B., Ward-Hull, C. I., & McLear, P. M. (1976). Variables related to women’s somatic preferences of the male and female body. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1200–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash, T. F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen, M., & Galumbeck, C. (1989). Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danel, D., & Pawlowski, B. (2006). Attractiveness of men’s faces in relation to women’s phase of menstrual cycle. Collegium Antropologicum, 30, 285–289.Google Scholar
  10. Degelman, D., & Price, N. D. (2002). Tattoos and ratings of personal characteristics. Psychological Reports, 90, 507–514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmonds, E. M., & Cahoon, D. D. (1984). Female clothes preference related to male sexual interest. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furnham, A., Hester, C., & Weir, C. (1990). Sex differences in the preferences for specific female body shapes. Sex Roles, 22, 743–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnham, A., Lavancy, M., & McClelland, A. (2001). Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gitter, G. A., Lomranz, J., Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, Y. (1983). Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 7–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Greer, A. E., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guéguen, N. (2007a). Women’s bust size and men’s courtship solicitation. Body Image, 4, 386–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guéguen, N. (2007b). Bust size and hitchhiking: A field study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 1294–1298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guéguen, N. (2008). The effects of women’s cosmetics on men’s courtship behavior. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 221–228.Google Scholar
  19. Guéguen, N. (2011a). Pourquoi faut-il sourire lorsque l’on n’est pas beau? Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  20. Guéguen, N. (2011b). The effect of women’s suggestive clothing on men’s behavior and judgment: A field study. Psychological Reports, 109, 635–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Guéguen, N. (2012a). Tattoos, piercings, and alcohol consumption. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 1253–1256.Google Scholar
  22. Guéguen, N. (2012b). Tattoos, piercings, and sexual activity. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 1543–1547.Google Scholar
  23. Guéguen, N. (2012c). Color and women hitchhikers’ attractiveness: Gentlemen drivers prefer red. Color Research and Application. doi:10.002/col.20651.
  24. Guéguen, N. (2012d). Color and women’s attractiveness: When red clothed women are perceived to have more intense sexual intent. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 261–265.Google Scholar
  25. Guéguen, N., & Lamy, L. (2009). Hitchhiking women’s hair color. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 941–948.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkes, D., Seen, C. Y., & Thorn, C. (2004). Factors that influence attitudes toward women with tattoos. Sex Roles, 50, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness: Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hynie, M., Schuller, R. A., & Couperthwaite, L. (2003). Perceptions of sexual intent: The impact of condom possession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacob, C., Guéguen, N., Boulbry, G., & Ardicioni, R. (2009). Waitresses’ facial cosmetics and tipping: A field experiment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koukounas, E., & Letch, N. M. (2001). Psychological correlates of perception of sexual intent in women. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 443–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Niesta Kayser, D., Elliot, A. J., & Feltman, R. (2010). Red and romantic behavior in men viewing women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 901–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nowosielski, K., Sipinski, A., Kuczerawy, I., Kozłowska-Rup, D., & Skrzypulec-Plinta, V. (2012). Tattoos, piercing, and sexual behaviors in young adults. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 2307–2314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pazda, A. D., Elliott, A. J., & Greitemeyer, T. (2012). Sexy red: Perceived sexual receptivity mediates the red-attraction relation in men viewing woman. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robert, T. A., & Ryan, S. A. (2002). Tattooing and high-risk behavior in adolescents. Pediatrics, 11, 1058–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seiter, J. S., & Hatch, S. (2005). Effect of tattoos on perceptions of credibility and attractiveness. Psychological Reports, 96, 1113–1120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior? Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of the waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, J., Gentry, J., & Chailland, C. (2006). Cosmetic expressions and sexuality: The relationship between body modifications and promiscuity. Hanover College. Available at http://vault.hanover.edu.
  44. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swami, V., & Barrett, S. (2011). British men’s hair color preferences: An assessment of courtship solicitation and stimulus ratings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 595–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2007). Unattractive, promiscuous, and heavy drinkers: Perceptions of women with tattoos. Body Image, 4, 343–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tiggeman, M., & Golder, F. (2006). Tattooing: An expression of uniqueness in the appearance domain. Body Image, 3, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wohlrab, S., Stahl, J., & Kappeler, P. M. (2007). Modifying the body: Motivations for getting tattooed and pierced. Body Image, 4, 87–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business DepartmentUniversité de Bretagne-SudVannesFrance

Personalised recommendations