Feederism: An Exaggeration of a Normative Mate Selection Preference?
- 759 Downloads
Quinsey and Lalumière (1995) suggested that some, if not most, paraphilias are exaggerated manifestations of more normative and functional mate selection preferences. The present study tested whether Feederism, a fat fetish focused on erotic eating, feeding, and gaining weight, is an exaggeration of a sexual arousal pattern commonly seen in the general population. Thirty participants (15 men and 15 women) recruited from the general population were assessed using penile plethysmography and vaginal photoplethysmography, respectively. None of the participants were self-identified Feeders or Feedees. Participants were shown sexual, neutral, and feeding still images while listening to audio recordings of sexual, neutral, and feeding stories. Participants did not genitally respond to feeding stimuli. However, both men and women subjectively rated feeding stimuli as more sexually arousing than neutral stimuli. We discuss the discordance between physiological and self-reported sexual arousal in the context of sex differences in sexual concordance and implications for future research.
KeywordsFeederism Paraphilia Sexual arousal Vaginal photoplethysmography Penile plethysmography (phallometry)
A version of this article was presented at the University of Lethbridge Workshop, The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation: What Is It and How Does It Work?, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, June 2010.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Bestard, A. D. (2008). Feederism: An exploratory study into the stigma of erotic weight gain. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON.Google Scholar
- Fedoroff, P., Fishell, A., & Fedoroff, B. (1999). A case series of women evaluated for paraphilic sexual disorders. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 127–140.Google Scholar
- Freund, K. (1990). Courtship disorder. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 195–207). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Gates, K. (2000). Deviant desires: Incredibly strange sex. New York: Juno Books.Google Scholar
- Giovanelli, D., & Peluso, N. M. (2006). Feederism: A new sexual pleasure and subculture. In S. Seidman, N. Fischer, & C. Meeks (Eds.), Handbook of new sexuality studies (pp. 309–313). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, H. S. (1979). Disorders of sexual desire and other new concepts and techniques in sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Kulick, D. (2005). Porn. In D. Kulick & A. Meneley (Eds.), Fat: The anthropology of an obsession (pp. 77–92). New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
- Laan, E., & Everaerd, W. (1995). Determinants of female sexual arousal: Psychophysiological theory and data. Annual Review of Sex Research, 6, 32–76.Google Scholar
- Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 278–290). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Laws, D. R., & O’Donohue, W. (Eds.). (1997). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ludwig, E. (2008, March). Super-size me: These men and women are hot for partners with more than a little meat on their bones. Men Style. Retrieved from http://men.style/details/features/landing?id=content_5548.
- Quinsey, V. L., & Lalumière, M. L. (1995). Evolutionary perspectives on sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 301–315.Google Scholar
- Vohs, K. D., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Sex in “his” versus “her” relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 455–476). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Walen, S. R., & Roth, D. (1987). A cognitive approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 335–362). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar