Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 161–172 | Cite as

Viewing Time as a Measure of Bisexual Sexual Interest

  • Megan Ebsworth
  • Martin L. Lalumière
Original Paper

Abstract

Studies of bisexual sexual interest have focused mostly on measures of genital arousal in bisexual men and have generally failed to find evidence of a bisexual pattern of genital arousal. Bisexual women have rarely been studied and other measures of sexual interest have not been used to study bisexual interest in either sex. In this study, we examined a non-genital measure of sexual interest, viewing time, among 16 bisexual men, 19 bisexual women, 15 heterosexual men, 15 heterosexual women, 15 homosexual men, and 10 homosexual women. Sexual orientation was determined from a self-report questionnaire. Stimuli were pictures of males and females of all five Tanner stages of sexual development. Participants were asked to rate the sexual appeal of the individuals depicted in the pictures, while the time taken to provide a response was covertly measured. Using a signed index that compared viewing times to pictures of sexually mature males and females, bisexual men and bisexual women did not look longer at pictures of one gender, whereas the other four groups had longer viewing times for pictures of one gender. Using an absolute index, the three groups of women showed a similar (and low) degree of gender preference. All groups showed longer viewing times for sexually mature individuals than for sexually immature individuals, suggesting that the viewing time responses of bisexual men and women were not produced by a general tendency to look indiscriminately at all pictures. There were small to moderate correlations between viewing times and rated sexual appeal in all groups. Results suggest that viewing time can be used to detect a bisexual pattern of sexual interest in bisexual men and bisexual women.

Keywords

Bisexuality Homosexuality Heterosexuality Viewing time Sexual orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the financial support of the University of Lethbridge. We thank the following people who were involved with data collection, data entry, or data analysis: Rylan Boudreau, Annabree Fairweather, Laura Gothreau, Margaux Gregson, Ryan Mallard, and Lindsay Sewall. We also thank Samantha Dawson, Grant Harris, Megan Sawatsky, Michael Seto, and Kelly Suschinsky for their useful comments and suggestions during the writing of this article. A version of this article was presented at the University of Lethbridge Workshop, The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation: What Is It and How Does It Work? Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, June 2010.

References

  1. Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–63). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., Rieger, G., & Rosenthal, A. M. (2011). Still in search of bisexual sexual arousal: Comment on Cerny and Janssen (2011). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1293–1295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Both, S., van Boxtel, G., Stekelenburg, J., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2005). Modulation of spinal reflexes by sexual films of increasing intensity. Psychophysiology, 42, 726–731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cerny, J. A., & Janssen, E. (2011). Patterns of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 687–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chivers, M. L. (2003). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering. 65(01), AAT 3118520.Google Scholar
  6. Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70, 115–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time effects revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1275–1288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 551–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  13. Laws, D. R., & Gress, C. L. Z. (2004). Seeing things differently: The viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 9, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lippa, R. A. (in press). Men and women with bisexual identities show bisexual patterns of sexual attraction to male and female “swimsuit models”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Google Scholar
  15. Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation (PPAC). (2004). The NRP (not real people) stimulus set for assessment of sexual interest. Victoria, BC: Author.Google Scholar
  16. Quinsey, V. L., Ketsetzis, M., Earls, C., & Karamanoukian, A. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2011a). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men revisited. Biological Psychology, 88, 112–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2011b). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9881-7.
  20. Rullo, J. E., Stassberg, D. S., & Israel, E. (2010). Category-specificity in sexual interest in gay men and lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 874–879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slob, A. K., Bax, C. M., Hop, W. C. J., Rowland, D. L., & van der Werff ten Bosch, J. J. (1996). Sexual arousability and the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 21, 545–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strassberg, D. S., & Lowe, K. (1995). Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 369–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Category-specificity and sexual concordance: The stability of sex differences in sexual arousal patterns. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20, 93–108.Google Scholar
  25. Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2009). Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: Measurement artifacts or true phenomena? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 559–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanner, J. M. (1962). Growth at adolescence (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Tollison, C. D., Adams, H. E., & Tollison, J. W. (1979). Cognitive and physiological indices of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual males. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wright, L. W., & Adams, H. E. (1999). The effects of stimuli that vary in erotic content on cognitive processes. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations