Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies
- 1.1k Downloads
Faces and bodies convey important information for the identification of potential sexual partners, yet clothing typically covers many of the bodily cues relevant for mating and reproduction. In this eye tracking study, we assessed how men and women viewed nude and clothed, same and opposite gender human figures. We found that participants inspected the nude bodies more thoroughly. First fixations landed almost always on the face, but were subsequently followed by viewing of the chest and pelvic regions. When viewing nude images, fixations were biased away from the face towards the chest and pelvic regions. Fixating these regions was also associated with elevated physiological arousal. Overall, men spent more time looking at female than male stimuli, whereas women looked equally long at male and female stimuli. In comparison to women, men spent relatively more time looking at the chests of nude female stimuli whereas women spent more time looking at the pelvic/genital region of male stimuli. We propose that the augmented and gender-contingent visual scanning of nude bodies reflects selective engagement of the visual attention circuits upon perception of signals relevant to choosing a sexual partner, which supports mating and reproduction.
KeywordsEye movements Body Nudity Visual attention Sexuality Mate choice
This research was supported by the AivoAalto grant from the Aalto University, and Academy of Finland (Grant # 251125 to LN). We thank Sanni Aalto, Jenny Wahlström, and Anna Backström for their help with data acquisition.
- de Gelder, B., Van den Stock, J., Meeren, H. K. M., Sinke, C. B. A., Kret, M. E., & Tamietto, M. (2010). Standing up for the body: Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 513–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, G. F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Evolution and human behavior: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Pouliot, M. C., Despres, J. P., Lemieux, S., Moorjani, S., Bouchard, C., Tremblay, A., … Lupien, P. J. (1994). Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter–Best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose-tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. American Journal of Cardiology, 73, 460–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saunders, D. R., Williamson, D. K., & Troje, N. F. (2010). Gaze patterns during perception of direction and gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision, 10. doi: 10.1167/10.11.9.
- Schiffer, B., Krueger, T., Paul, T., de Greiff, A., Forsting, M., Leygraf, N., … Gizewski, E. (2008). Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 33, 23–33.Google Scholar
- Sell, R. L. (1996). The Sell Assessment of Sexual Orientation: Background and scoring. Journal of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Identity, 1, 295–310.Google Scholar
- Walen, S. R., & Roth, D. (1987). A cognitive approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 335–362). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Wandell, B. A. (1995). Foundations of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar