Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1053–1062 | Cite as

A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Women’s Experiences of Anal Intercourse: Meanings Related to Pain and Pleasure

  • Aleksandar Štulhofer
  • Dea Ajduković
Original Paper


The aim of this mixed-methods study was to document and analyze the dimensions and meanings of anoreceptive pain and pleasure among heterosexual women. An online survey was carried out on a convenience sample of 1,893 women aged 18–60 years. Qualitative data were collected using open-ended questions mailed to women who expressed interest in continuing participation in the study; narratives from 68 women who had experienced anal intercourse were collected and analyzed for pain themes. Most surveyed women had experienced anoreceptive intercourse. A majority of women (79.1 %) reported their first anal intercourse to be painful, but for most of them the intensity and duration of pain/discomfort substantially diminished over time. Less than a third (27.7 %) of participants who regularly engaged in anoreceptive intercourse in the past 12 months stated that they rarely or never experience pain/discomfort with the practice. Nevertheless, most women who continued to practice anal intercourse (58.1 %) reported it to be very arousing and pleasurable. The pleasure associated with anoreceptive intercourse was best predicted by masturbatory frequency and orgasmic ability (with sexual intercourse). The qualitative assessment pointed to a wide range of personal experiences with and meanings attached to pain/discomfort associated with anoreceptive intercourse. Three broad pain themes emerged: (1) pain as insurmountable obstacle, (2) strategic management of pain, and (3) pain eroticization. The study findings suggested that the successful inclusion of anal intercourse into a couple’s sex life is often dependent on a specific learning process.


Anal intercourse Pain Sexual pleasure Women 



The authors would like to thank Sophie Bergeron for her comments and suggestions.


  1. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405. doi: 10.1177/146879410100100307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. I., & Baldwin, J. D. (2000). Heterosexual anal intercourse: An understudied, high-risk sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 357–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brody, S., & Potterat, J. J. (2003). Assessing the role of anal intercourse in the epidemiology of AIDS in Africa. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 14, 431–436. doi: 10.1258/095646203322025704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Damon, W., & Rosser, B. R. (2005). Anodyspareunia in men who have sex with men: Prevalence, predictors, consequences and the development of DSM diagnostic criteria. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/00926230590477989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desrochers, G., Bergeron, S., Khalife, S., Dupuis, M.-J., & Jodoin, M. (2009). Fear avoidance and self-efficacy in relation to pain and sexual impairment in women with provoked vestibulodynia. Clinical Journal of Pain, 25, 520–527. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819976e3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flannery, D., Ellingson, L., Votaw, K. S., & Schaefer, E. A. (2003). Anal intercourse and sexual risk factors among college women, 1993–2000. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 281–292.Google Scholar
  8. Hensel, D. J., Fortenberry, J. D., & Orr, D. P. (2008). Variations in coital and noncoital sexual repertoire among adolescent women. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herbenick, D. (2011). Good in bed guide to anal pleasuring. Retrieved from
  10. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenbery, D. J. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(Suppl. 5), 255–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02012.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hollows, K. (2007). Anodyspareunia: A novel sexual dysfunction? An exploration into anal sexuality. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 429–443. doi: 10.1080/14681990701481409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenssen, M. P. (2008). Pain assessment in clinical trials. In H. M. Wittink & D. Carr (Eds.), Evidence, outcomes, and quality of life in pain treatment (pp. 57–88). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, A. M., Mercer, C. H., Erens, B., Copas, A. J., McManus, S., Wellings, K., … Field, J. (2001). Sexual behaviour in Britain: Partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet, 358, 1835–1842. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06883-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewin, B. (Ed.). (2000). Sex in Sweden: On the Swedish sexual life. Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health.Google Scholar
  15. Maynard, E., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Venteneac, A., Exner, T., & Mayer, K. (2009). Women’s experiences with anal sex: Motivation and implications for STD prevention. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 142–149. doi: 10.1363/4114209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McBride, K. R., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Heterosexual anal sexuality and anal sex behaviors: A review. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 123–136. doi: 10.1080/00224490903402538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morin, J. (1998). Anal pleasure and health. San Francisco: Down There Press.Google Scholar
  18. Orbuch, T. L. (1997). People’s accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 455–478. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogala, C., & Tydén, T. (2003). Does pornography influence young women’s sexual behavior? Women’s Health Issues, 13, 39–43. doi: 10.1016/S1049-3867(02)00174-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosser, B. R., Short, B. J., Thurmes, P. J., & Coleman, E. (1998). Anodyspareunia, the unacknowledged sexual dysfunction: A validation study of painful receptive anal intercourse and its psychosexual concomitants in homosexual men. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 24, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Satterwhite, C. L., Kamb, M. L., Metcalf, C., Douglas, J. M., Malotte, C. K., Paul, S., & Peterman, T. A. (2007). Changes in sexual behavior and STD prevalence among heterosexual STD clinic attendees: 1993–1995 versus 1999–2000. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34, 815–819. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31805c751d.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Štulhofer, A., & Ajduković, D. (2011). Should we take anodyspareunia seriously? A descriptive analysis of pain during receptive anal intercourse in young heterosexual women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 37, 346–358. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.607039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Štulhofer, A., & Baćak, V. (2011). Is anal sex a marker for sexual risk taking: Results from a population-based study of young Croatian adults. Sexual Health, 8, 384–389. doi: 10.1071/SH10078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Štulhofer, A., Kuljanić, K., & Štulhofer, D. (2010). Sexual health difficulties in a population-based sample of Croatian women aged 18–35 and the effects of the dual (career and motherhood) role. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 1314–1321. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02100.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sexology Unit, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Unit for Psychological Medicine, Merkur Teaching HospitalUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations