Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1033–1041 | Cite as

Exploring the Automatic Undercurrents of Sexual Narcissism: Individual Differences in the Sex-Aggression Link

  • Roland ImhoffEmail author
  • Xenia Bergmann
  • Rainer Banse
  • Alexander F. Schmidt
Original Paper

Abstract

Sexual narcissism (SN) has recently been proposed to be a specific risk factor for the perpetration of sexual coercion based on both self-reports of previous behavior and self-estimated likelihood of engaging in acts of sexual violence. To explore one of the potential underlying mechanisms of SN, we tested whether for highly sexually narcissistic males (measured with the German language version of the Sexual Narcissism Scale) the subtle priming of sexual concepts would evoke aggressive behavior in a standard measure of aggressive behavior, the Taylor Aggression Paradigm. Results showed that only for sexually narcissistic men did a subtle priming with mildly erotic words lead to an increase in shock volumes administered to the alleged competitor on this task. For women, it was postulated that physical force would not be represented as a functional behavioral script for sexually narcissistic females and, in line with this hypothesis, no effects were found for women. The results were discussed with regard to the underlying processes of SN and the importance of an individual difference perspective in sex-aggression links.

Keywords

Sexual narcissism Sexual aggression Taylor Aggression Paradigm Sex priming Behavior priming 

References

  1. Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II: Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22, 258–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Devine, P. G. (2003). Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink responses and self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 738–753. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., et al. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151–173. doi: 10.1037/a0018251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, R. A. (1974). The aggression-inhibiting influence of heightened sexual arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 318–322. doi: 10.1037/h0036887.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond, A., & Lader, M. (1986). A method to elicit aggressive feelings and behaviour via provocation. Biological Psychology, 22, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90021-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bushman, B. J., Bonacci, A. M., van Dijk, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Narcissism, sexual refusal, and aggression: Testing a narcissistic reactance model of sexual coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1027–1040. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835–848. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2012). Flirting with disaster: Short-term mating orientation and hostile sexism predict different types of sexual harassment. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 521–531. doi: 10.1002/ab.21444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.865.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, W. A., & Grenier, G. (1994). Violent pornography, antiwoman thoughts, and antiwoman acts: In search of reliable effects. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 23–38. doi: 10.1080/00224499409551727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giancola, P. R., & Parrott, D. J. (2008). Further evidence for the validity of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 214–229. doi: 10.1002/ab.20235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giancola, P. R., & Zeichner, A. (1995). Construct validity of a competitive reaction time aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 199–204. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<199:AID-AB2480210303>3.0.CO;2Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaffe, Y., Malamuth, N., Feingold, J., & Feshbach, S. (1974). Sexual arousal and behavioral aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 759–764. doi: 10.1037/h0037526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jewkes, R., Sen, P., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Sexual violence. In E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lazano (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 147–181). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  19. Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007). Men’s sex-dominance inhibition: Do men automatically refrain from sexually dominant behavior? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1617–1631. doi: 10.1177/0146167207305856.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolivas, E. D., & Gross, A. M. (2007). Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). Scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krahé, B., Waizenhöfer, E., & Möller, I. (2003). Women’s sexual aggression against men: Prevalence and predictors. Sex Roles, 49, 219–232. doi: 10.1023/A:1024648106477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larue, D., Schmidt, A. F., Imhoff, R., Eggers, K., Schönbrodt, F., & Banse, R. (2012). Getting a grip on sadism: Direct and indirect measures of preferences for sexual violence. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  24. Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maddux, W. W., Barden, J., Brewer, M. B., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Saying no to negativity: The effect of context and motivation to control prejudice on automatic evaluative responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 19–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01075.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meyer, T. P. (1972). The effects of sexually arousing and violent films on aggressive behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 8, 324–331. doi: 10.1080/00224497209550766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mussweiler, T., & Förster, J. (2000). The sex-aggression link: A perception-behavior dissociation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 507–520. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi: 10.3102/10769986031004437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seto, M. C., Maric, A., & Barbaree, H. E. (2001). The role of pornography in the etiology of sexual aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 35–53. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(99)00007-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Widman, L., & McNulty, J. K. (2010). Sexual narcissism and the perpetration of sexual aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 926–939. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9461-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiers, R., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action-tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach-bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490–497. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zurbriggen, E. L. (2000). Social motives and power-sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 559–581. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Imhoff
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xenia Bergmann
    • 2
  • Rainer Banse
    • 2
  • Alexander F. Schmidt
    • 2
  1. 1.Department PsychologieGermany Sozialpsychologie: Social CognitionCologneGermany
  2. 2.Social and Legal Psychology, Department of PsychologyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations