Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 561–571

Sex, Commitment, and Casual Sex Relationships Among College Men: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

  • Spencer B. Olmstead
  • Rhett M. Billen
  • Kathryn A. Conrad
  • Kay Pasley
  • Frank D. Fincham
Original Paper


Using a sample of 200 emerging adult male college students, we examined how men varied in the meanings they gave to sex and their self-reported engagement in two types of casual sex relationships (hookups and friends with benefits). Using qualitative methods, we conducted a content analysis of men’s written responses to a series of questions about the meanings they ascribed to sex (i.e., intercourse), their perceived connection between sex and commitment, and how they believed these meanings were related to their sexual behavior. Three groups of men emerged: Committers, Flexibles, and Recreationers. Groups were then compared on social desirability, demographic characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, year in school, religious service attendance), and self-reported casual sexual behaviors in the past 12 months. Analyses showed that men in the Flexibles and Recreationers groups engaged in significantly more hookups and had significantly more friends with benefits partners in the past 12 months than did men in the Committers group. Implications for relationship education intervention aimed at men and research on casual sex relationships are discussed.


Emerging adulthood Sexuality Romantic relationships College men 


  1. Afifi, W. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2000). On being ‘just friends’: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in cross-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 205–222. doi:10.1177/0265407500172003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, K. R., Husser, E. K., Stone, D. J., & Jordal, C. E. (2008). Agency and error in young adults’ stories of sexual decision making. Family Relations, 57, 517–529. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00519.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.5.469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the early twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arnett, J. J. (2006). Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnett, J. J., & Tanner, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Barkan, S. E. (2006). Religiosity and premarital sex in adulthood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkowitz, D., & Marsiglio, W. (2007). Gay men: Negotiating procreative, father, and family identities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 366–381. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00371.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood, what it’s done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–45). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974). The small sample behavior of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technometrics, 16, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buhl, H. M., & Lanz, M. (2007). Emerging adulthood in Europe: Common traits and variability across five European countries. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 439–443. doi:10.1177/0743558407306345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byers, E. S., Henderson, J., & Hobson, K. M. (2009). University students’ definitions of sexual abstinence and having sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 665–674. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9289-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, R. D. (1990). The impact of AIDS on gender differences in willingness to engage in casual sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 771–782. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00437.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Downing-Matibag, T. M., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209. doi:10.1177/1049732309344206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunnett, C. W. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 796–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 150–158. doi:10.1080/00224490509552268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiation of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424. doi:10.1080/00224490902775801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 36, 346–350. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S. M., & Rhoades, G. K. (2011). Relationship education in emerging adulthood: Problems and prospects. In F. D. Fincham & M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 293–316). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fisher, W. A., White, L. A., Byrne, D., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151. doi:10.1080/00224498809551448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. doi:10.1177/0886260506295354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forrest, K. A. (2001). Men’s reproductive and sexual health. Journal of American College Health, 49, 253–266. doi:10.1080/07448480109596312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–112.Google Scholar
  32. Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 25, 26–43. doi:10.1080/07370010701836385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hans, J. D., Gillen, M., & Akande, K. A. R. (2010). Sex redefined: The reclassification of oral-genital contact. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42, 74–78. doi:10.1363/4207410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herold, E. S., & Mewhinney, D. K. (1993). Gender differences in casual sex and AIDS prevention: A survey of dating bars. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 36–42. doi:10.1080/00224499309551676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C. S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1994). Achieving masculine sexuality: Young men’s strategies for managing vulnerability. In L. Doyal, J. Naidoo, & T. Wilton (Eds.), AIDS: Setting a feminist agenda (pp. 122–148). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  36. Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on non-relationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaestle, C. E., & Halpern, C. T. (2007). What’s love got to do with it? Sexual behaviors of opposite-sex couples through emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 134–140. doi:10.1363/3913407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelley, S. S., Borawski, E. A., Flocke, S. A., & Keen, K. J. (2003). The role of sequential and concurrent sexual relationships in the risk of sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 296–305. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00710-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland. New York: HarperCollins Publisher.Google Scholar
  40. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500. doi:10.1177/019251300021004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837–857. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 275–284. doi:10.1080/00224491003721694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manlove, J., Franzetta, K., Ryan, S., & Moore, K. (2006). Adolescent sexual relationships, contraceptive consistency, and pregnancy prevention approaches. In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood (pp. 181–212). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Norusis, M. J. (2007). SPSS 15.0 guide to data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  46. Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on “friends with benefits” relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 311–320. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9611-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. F. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals’ definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 256–268. doi:10.1080/00224490701443932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pitts, M., & Rahman, M. (2001). Which behaviors constitute “having sex” among university students in the UK? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 169–176. doi:10.1023/A:1002777201416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. PREP for Individuals, Inc. (2005, October). Within my reach: Participant workbook (Version 2.1). Denver, CO: Author.Google Scholar
  53. Puentes, J., Knox, D., & Zusman, M. E. (2008). Participants in “friends with benefits” relationships. College Student Journal, 42, 176–180.Google Scholar
  54. Reeder, H. M. (2000). ‘I like you…as a friend’: The role of attraction in cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 329–348. doi:10.1177/0265407500173002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Regnerus, M., & Uecker, J. (2011). Premarital sex in America: How young Americans meet, mate, and think about marrying. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Reiss, I. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  57. Rose, S. M., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509. doi:10.1007/BF00289677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 5, 295–319. doi:10.1080/136910501171698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2011). Digest of education statistics 2010 (NCES 2011-015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  61. Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love and lose at both. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  62. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogenous versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. VanderDrift, L. E., Lehmiller, J. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2012). Commitment in friends with benefits relationships: Implications for relational and safe-sex outcomes. Personal Relationships, 19, 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01324.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wagner, L. I., Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2001). Close emotional relationship with women versus men: A qualitative study of 56 heterosexual men living in an inner-city neighborhood. Journal of Men’s Studies, 9, 243–256. doi:10.3149/jms.0902.243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spencer B. Olmstead
    • 1
  • Rhett M. Billen
    • 1
  • Kathryn A. Conrad
    • 1
  • Kay Pasley
    • 2
  • Frank D. Fincham
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Education, Health, and Human SciencesThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family & Child Sciences, College of Human SciencesThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.The FSU Family InstituteThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations