Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 711–724 | Cite as

The Second to Fourth Digit Ratio (2D:4D) in a Japanese Twin Sample: Heritability, Prenatal Hormone Transfer, and Association with Sexual Orientation

  • Kai HiraishiEmail author
  • Shoko Sasaki
  • Chizuru Shikishima
  • Juko Ando
Original Paper


The second to fourth digit ratio has been argued to reflect prenatal hormonal influences and is reportedly associated with various psychological and behavioral traits, such as sexual orientation, cognitive abilities, and personality. We examined genetic and environmental influences on the second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) using a Japanese twin sample (N = 300). The genetic analysis showed substantial additive genetic influences for both right and left hand 2D:4D. The rest of the variance was explained mainly by environmental influences not shared within twin pairs. These findings were, in general, in accordance with preceding studies with primarily Caucasian twin samples. The bivariate genetic analysis revealed that the additive genetic influences were largely shared between the right and left hand, while the non-shared environmental influences were largely unique to each hand. Results from a comparison of opposite-sex and same-sex twins were not significant, although they were in the predicted direction according to the prenatal hormone transfer hypothesis. Female monozygotic twin pairs discordant in sexual orientation showed significant within-pair differences in left hand 2D:4D, where non-heterosexual twins had lower (more masculinized) 2D:4D. In addition, we found that non-heterosexual male MZ twins had larger (more feminized) 2D:4D than their heterosexual co-twins. These results suggest the existence of non-shared environmental influences that affect both 2D:4D and sexual orientation.


2D:4D Finger-length ratios Heritability Prenatal hormone transfer Sexual orientation Twins 



We would like to express our gratitude to the twins registered with the Keio Twin Registry who participated in the study. This study was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (16330133) by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, by the Centre for Integrated Research on the Mind at Keio University, and by the collaborative research project at Kokoro Research Center at Kyoto University.


  1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, E. J., Manning, J. T., McInroy, K., & Mathews, E. (2002). A preliminary investigation of the associations between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1115–1124. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (2001). Fraternal birth order and the maternal immune hypothesis of male homosexuality. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 105–114. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R., & Klassen, P. (1997). H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185, 373–378. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogaert, A. F., & Skorska, M. (2011). Sexual orientation, fraternal birth order, and the maternal immune hypothesis: A review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen-Bendahan, C. C. C. (2005). Biological roots of sex differences: A longitudinal twin study. Doctoral dissertation, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Gobrogge, K., Breedlove, S., & Klump, K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on 2D:4D finger length ratios: A study of monozygotic and dizygotic male and female twins. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 112–118. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9272-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grimbos, T., Dawood, K., Burriss, R. P., Zucker, K. J., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Sexual orientation and the second to fourth finger length ratio: A meta-analysis in men and women. Behavioral Neuroscience, 124, 278–287. doi: 10.1037/a0018764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, L. S., & Love, C. T. (2003). Finger-length ratios in female monozygotic twins discordant for sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 23–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoekstra, C., Zhao, Z. Z., Lambalk, C. B., Willemsen, G., Martin, N. G., Boomsma, D. I., et al. (2008). Dizygotic twinning. Human Reproduction Update, 14, 37–47. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hönekopp, J., Manning, J. T., & Müller, C. (2006). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.11.006.
  12. Hönekopp, J., & Watson, S. (2010). Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. American Journal of Human Biology, 22, 619–630. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Imaizumi, Y. (2001). Estimated number of multiplets under 16 years using two sets of census data in Japan: 1990 and 1995. Twin Research, 4, 232–237. doi: 10.1375/1369052012443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35. doi: 10.1300/J082v11n01_04.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lippa, R. A. (2003). Are 2D:4D finger-length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 179–188. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lippa, R. A. (2006). Finger lengths, 2D:4D ratios, and their relation to gender-related personality traits and the Big Five. Biological Psychology, 71, 116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.02.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loehlin, J., Medland, S., & Martin, N. (2009). Relative finger lengths, sex differences, and psychological traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 298–305. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9303-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D., et al. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00029-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., & Mather, F. M. (2004a). Second to fourth digit ratio, sexual selection, and skin colour. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 38–50. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00082-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., Newton, D. J., & Flanagan, B. F. (2003a). The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 399–405. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00052-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manning, J. T., Churchill, A. J. G., & Peters, M. (2007). The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 223–233. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9171-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manning, J., Henzi, P., Venkatramana, P., Martin, S., & Singh, D. (2003b). Second to fourth digit ratio: Ethnic differences and family size in English, Indian and South African populations. Annals of Human Biology, 30, 579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manning, J. T., & Robinson, S. J. (2003). 2nd to 4th digit ratio and a universal mean for prenatal testosterone in homosexual men. Medical Hypotheses, 61, 303–306. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00184-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manning, J., Scutt, D., & Lewis-Jones, D. (1998). Developmental stability, ejaculate size, and sperm quality in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 273–282. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00024-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manning, J., Stewart, A., Bundred, P., & Trivers, R. (2004b). Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children. Early Human Development, 80, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.06.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manning, J. T., & Taylor, R. P. (2001). Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: Implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00063-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McFadden, D., Loehlin, J. C., Breedlove, S. M., Lippa, R. A., Manning, J. T., & Rahman, Q. (2005). A reanalysis of five studies on sexual orientation and the relative length of the 2nd and 4th fingers (the 2D:4D ratio). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 341–356. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-3123-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McFadden, D., & Shubel, E. (2002). Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 492–500. doi: 06/hbeh.2002.1833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre, M. H., Cohn, B. A., & Ellison, P. T. (2006). Sex dimorphism in digital formulae of children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129, 143–150. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Medland, S. E., & Loehlin, J. C. (2008). Multivariate genetic analyses of the 2D:4D ratio: Examining the effects of hand and measurement technique in data from 757 twin families. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 335–341. doi: 10.1375/twin.11.3.335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Medland, S. E., Loehlin, J. C., & Martin, N. G. (2008). No effects of prenatal hormone transfer on digit ratio in a large sample of same- and opposite-sex dizygotic twins. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1225–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2004). Mx: Statistical modelling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry. Retrieved from
  33. Neale, M. C., & Maes, H. H. M. (2002). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  34. Ooki, S., Yamada, K., Asaka, A., & Hayakawa, K. (1990). Zygosity diagnosis of twins by questionnaire. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 39, 109–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Paul, S. N., Kato, B. S., Cherkas, L. F., Andrew, T., & Spector, T. D. (2006). Heritability of the second to fourth digit ratio (2d:4d): A twin study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 215–219. doi: 10.1375/twin.9.2.215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 251–260. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9166-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioral genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Puts, D., McDaniel, M., Jordan, C., & Breedlove, S. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Putz, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., Sporter, R. J., & McBurney, D. H. (2004). Sex hormones and finger length: What does 2D:4D indicate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 182–199. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shikishima, C., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Toda, T., & Yoshimura, K. (2006). Registry of adolescent and young adult twins in the tokyo area. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 811–816. doi: 10.1375/twin.9.6.811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Anders, S. M., Vernon, P. A., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006). Finger-length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone-transfer between opposite-sex twins. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 315–319. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.08.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Voracek, M., & Dressler, S. G. (2007). Digit ratio (2D:4D) in twins: Heritability estimates and evidence for a masculinized trait expression in women from opposite-sex pairs. Psychological Reports, 100, 115–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Voracek, M., & Dressler, S. G. (2009). Familial resemblance in digit ratio (2D:4D). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140, 376–380. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, T. J., Pepitone, M. E., Christensen, S. E., Cooke, B. M., Huberman, A. D., Breedlove, N. J., et al. (2000). Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature, 404, 455–456. doi: 10.1038/35006555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Hiraishi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shoko Sasaki
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chizuru Shikishima
    • 4
  • Juko Ando
    • 5
  1. 1.Kokoro Research CenterKyoto UniversitySakyoJapan
  2. 2.Japan Society for the Promotion of Science/Graduate School of Arts and SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Gender Identity Service, Child, Youth, and Family ProgramCenter for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Keio Advanced Research CentersKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of LettersKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations