Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 507–515 | Cite as

Competence to Consent to Sexual Activity in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenic Spectrum Disorders

  • Gabriele Mandarelli
  • Stefania Zangaro
  • Michele Raja
  • Antonella Azzoni
  • Roberto Tatarelli
  • Stefano Ferracuti
Original Paper

Abstract

Little is known about the ability of persons with severe mental disorders to give consent to sexual activity. A possible reason for this shortcoming is the absence of specific criteria and tools to measure sexual consent in psychiatric clinical settings. We developed a clinician oriented semi-structured interview, the Sexual Consent Assessment Scale (SCAS), and investigated sexual consent capacity in a sample of hospitalized patients with bipolar disorder (n = 54, Mage = 38.1 years, 48% males) and schizophrenic spectrum disorders (n = 31, Mage = 38.4 years, 29% males). The SCAS items were derived from the criteria proposed by Kennedy and Niederbuhl (Am J Ment Retard, 106:503–510, 2001). The full scale and a shorter scale comprising 10 items (SCAS-10) achieved good initial validity. Patients with schizophrenic spectrum disorders had worse sexual consent capacity than patients with bipolar disorder. This difference was unexpectedly independent from patients’ symptomatology, as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Conversely, poor cognitive functioning measured by the Raven’s Standard Progressive matrices was associated with reduced capacity to give sexual consent in both groups. Subjects in the schizophrenic spectrum disorders group were more frequently judged incapable in basic knowledge of birth control methods and in domains underlying metacognitive abilities. Principal component analysis revealed two SCAS-10 interpretable factors: “appropriateness-recognition” and “consequences-metacognition.” Our study suggests that patients with severe psychiatric disorders, especially those with cognitive dysfunction, might be at risk of incapacity to give valid sexual consent.

Keywords

Sexual consent Bipolar disorder Schizophrenia Schizoaffective disorder Clinical assessment 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Clinical practice. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 1834–1840. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp074045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1635–1638. doi:10.1056/NEJM198812223192504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 475–486. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brüne, M. (2005). “Theory of mind” in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 21–42. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, W. T., Gold, J. M., Lahti, A. C., Queern, C. A., Conley, R. R., Bartko, J. J.,…Appelbaum, P.S. (2000). Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 533–538.Google Scholar
  7. Dingemans, P. M., Linszen, D. H., Lenior, M. E., & Smeets, R. M. (1995). Component structure of the expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E). Psychopharmacology, 122, 263–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Folstein, M., Folstein, S., & McHugh, P. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical guide for grading the cognitive state of the patient for the physician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). ‘‘By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom’’: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 258–272. doi:10.1080/00224499909551996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howe, V., Foister, K., Jenkins, K., Skene, L., Copolov, D., & Keks, N. (2005). Competence to give informed consent in acute psychosis is associated with symptoms rather than diagnosis. Schizophrenia Research, 77, 211–214. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphreys, T. P. (2004). Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 209–225). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Humphreys, T. P., & Brousseau, M. M. (2009). The Sexual Consent Scale-Revised: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00224490903151358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Humphreys, T. P., & Herold, E. (2007). Sexual consent in heterosexual relationships: Development of a new measure. Sex Roles, 57, 305–315. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9264-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kennedy, C. H. (1999). Assessing competency to consent to sexual activity in the cognitively impaired population. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1, 17–33. doi:10.1300/J151v01n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kennedy, C. H., & Niederbuhl, J. (2001). Establishing criteria for sexual consent capacity. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 106, 503–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koren, D., Poyurovsky, M., Seidman, L. J., Goldsmith, M., Wenger, S., & Klein, E. M. (2005). The neuropsychological basis of competence to consent in first-episode schizophrenia: A pilot metacognitive study. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 609–616. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lukoff, D., Liberman, R. P., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (1986). Symptom monitoring in the rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12, 578–603. doi:10.1093/schbul/12.4.578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Misra, S., Socherman, R., Hauser, P., & Ganzini, L. (2008a). Appreciation of research information in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 10, 635–646. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2008.00609.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Misra, S., Socherman, R., Park, B. S., Hauser, P., & Ganzini, L. (2008b). Influence of mood state on capacity to consent to research in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 10, 303–309. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00525.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller-Oerlinghausen, B., Berghöfer, A., & Bauer, M. (2002). Bipolar disorder. Lancet, 359, 241–247. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07450-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799–812.Google Scholar
  23. Palmer, B. W., Dunn, L. B., Appelbaum, P. S., & Jeste, D. V. (2004). Correlates of treatment-related decision-making capacity among middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 230–236. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer, B. W., Dunn, L. B., Appelbaum, P. S., Mudaliar, S., Thal, L., Henry, R.,…Jeste, D. V. (2005). Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 726–733. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.726.Google Scholar
  25. Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual: Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  26. Raymont, V., Bingley, W., Buchanan, A., David, A. S., Hayward, P., Wessely, S., & Hotopf, M. (2004). Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: Cross-sectional study. Lancet, 364, 1421–1427. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17224-3.Google Scholar
  27. Rupp, H. A., James, T. W., Ketterson, E. D., Sengelaub, D. R., Janssen, E., & Heiman, J. R. (2009). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in women’s sexual decision making. Neuroscience Letters, 449, 42–47. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rutledge, E., Kennedy, M., O’Neill, H., & Kennedy, H. G. (2008). Functional mental capacity is not independent of the severity of psychosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 9–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spinnler, H., & Tognoni, G. (1987). Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 8, 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sundram, C. J., & Stavis, P. F. (1994). Sexuality and mental retardation: unmet challenges. Mental Retardation, 32, 255–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. van Os, J., & Kapur, S. (2009). Schizophrenia. Lancet, 374, 635–645. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60995-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ventura, J., Lukoff, D., Nuechterlein, K. H., Liberman, R. P., Green, M., & Shaner, A. (1993). Appendix 1: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Expanded Version (4.0) scales, anchor points and administration manual. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 3, 227–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Mandarelli
    • 1
  • Stefania Zangaro
    • 1
  • Michele Raja
    • 2
  • Antonella Azzoni
    • 2
  • Roberto Tatarelli
    • 1
  • Stefano Ferracuti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory OrgansUniversity of Rome “Sapienza”, Faculty of Medicine and PsychologyRomeItaly
  2. 2.Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e CuraSanto Spirito HospitalRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations