Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1403–1408 | Cite as

Pleasantness of the Odor of Androstenone as a Function of Sexual Intercourse Experience in Women and Men

  • Antti Knaapila
  • Hely Tuorila
  • Eero Vuoksimaa
  • Kaisu Keskitalo-Vuokko
  • Richard J. Rose
  • Jaakko Kaprio
  • Karri Silventoinen
Original Paper

Abstract

Androstenone (5α-androst-16-en-3-one) and other androstenes, body odor components occurring in apocrine secretions, may play a role in human chemosignaling. We hypothesized that the odor of androstenone may gain hedonic value from sexual intercourse experiences via associative learning. Young adults (N = 397, 61.5% women, age 21–24 years, randomly sampled regarding sexual experience) rated the intensity and pleasantness of the odors of androstenone, cinnamon, chocolate, isovaleric acid, lemon, and turpentine. Among women who were able to perceive androstenone, the odor was rated as more pleasant (less unpleasant) by those who had had experienced sexual intercourse with at least one partner (n = 175) than by those who reported never having experienced intercourse (n = 12, p = .006). The difference was specific to women. The results suggest that, among women, sexual experience may modify the pleasantness of the odor of androstenone.

Keywords

Androstenes Associative learning Body odor Evaluative conditioning Olfaction Smell 

References

  1. Barkat, S., Poncelet, J., Landis, B. N., Rouby, C., & Bensafi, M. (2008). Improved smell pleasantness after odor-taste associative learning in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 434, 108–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chu, S. (2008). Olfactory conditioning of positive performance in humans. Chemical Senses, 33, 65–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  4. De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Depue, R. (1987). General Behavior Inventory. Ithaca, NY: Department of Psychology, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, M., Wysocki, C. J., Leyden, J. J., Spielman, A. I., Sun, X., & Preti, G. (2008). Analyses of volatile organic compounds from human skin. British Journal of Dermatology, 159, 780–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gower, D. B., Holland, K. T., Mallet, A. I., Rennie, P. J., & Watkins, W. J. (1994). Comparison of 16-androstene steroid concentrations in sterile apocrine sweat and axillary secretion: Interconversions of 16-androstenes by the axillary microflora—a mechanism for axillary odor production in man? Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 48, 409–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Havlicek, J., Murray, A. K., Saxton, T. K., & Roberts, S. C. (2010). Current issues in the study of androstenes in human chemosignaling. Vitamins and Hormones, 83, 47–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herz, R. S. (2001). Ah, sweet skunk! Why we like or dislike what we smell. Cerebrum, 3, 31–47.Google Scholar
  10. Herz, R. S. (2005). Odor-associative learning and emotion: Effects on perception and behavior. Chemical Senses, 30(Suppl. 1), i250–i251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herz, R. S., Beland, S. L., & Hellerstein, M. (2004). Changing odor hedonic perception through emotional associations in humans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17, 315–338.Google Scholar
  12. Kaprio, J., Pulkkinen, L., & Rose, R. (2002). Genetic and environmental factors in health-related behaviors: Studies on Finnish twins and twin families. Twin Research, 5, 366–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Keller, A., Zhuang, H., Chi, Q., Vosshall, L. B., & Matsunami, H. (2007). Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature, 449, 468–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirk-Smith, M. D., Van Toller, C., & Dodd, G. H. (1983). Unconscious odor conditioning in human subjects. Biological Psychology, 17, 221–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knaapila, A., Tuorila, H., Silventoinen, K., Wright, M. J., Kyvik, K. O., Keskitalo, K., … Perola, M. (2008). Environmental effects exceed genetic effects on perceived intensity and pleasantness of several odors: A three-population twin study. Behavior Genetics, 38, 484–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lübke, K., Schablitzky, S., & Pause, B. (2009). Male sexual orientation affects sensitivity to androstenone. Chemosensory Perception, 2, 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez-Garzia, F., Martinez-Ricos, J., Augustin-Pavon, C., Martinez-Hernandez, J., Novejarque, A., & Lanuza, E. (2009). Refining the dual olfactory hypothesis: Pheromone reward and odor experience. Behavioural Brain Research, 200, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martins, Y., Preti, G., Crabtree, C. R., Runyan, T., Vainius, A. A., & Wysocki, C. J. (2005). Preference for human body odors is influenced by gender and sexual orientation. Psychological Science, 16, 694–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mustanski, B., Viken, R. J., Kaprio, J., Winter, T., & Rose, R. J. (2007). Sexual behavior in young adulthood: A population-based twin study. Health Psychology, 26, 610–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pause, B. M. (2004). Are androgen steroids acting as pheromones in humans? Physiology & Behavior, 83, 21–29.Google Scholar
  21. Rao, J. N. K., & Scott, A. J. (1984). On chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Annals of Statistics, 12, 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sookoian, S., Burgueno, A., Gianotti, T. F., Marillet, G., & Pirola, C. J. (2010). Odor perception between heterosexual partners: Its association with depression, anxiety, and genetic variation in odorant receptor OR7D4. Biological Psychology, 86, 153–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wysocki, C. J., & Gilbert, A. N. (1989). National geographic smell survey: Effects of age are heterogeneous. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 561, 12–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wysocki, C. J., & Preti, G. (2009). Human pheromones: What’s purported, what’s supported [White paper]. Retrieved from the Sense of Smell Institute: http://www.senseofsmell.org/papers/Human_Pheromones_Final%207-15-09.pdf
  25. Yeomans, M. R. (2006). Olfactory influences on appetite and satiety in humans. Physiology & Behavior, 89, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yeomans, M. R. (2010). Understanding individual differences in acquired flavor liking in humans. Chemosensory Perception, 3, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zucco, G. M., Paolini, M., & Schaal, B. (2009). Unconscious odor conditioning 25 years later: Revisiting and extending ‘Kirk-Smith, Van Toller and Dodd’. Learning and Motivation, 40, 364–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antti Knaapila
    • 1
  • Hely Tuorila
    • 2
  • Eero Vuoksimaa
    • 3
  • Kaisu Keskitalo-Vuokko
    • 3
  • Richard J. Rose
    • 4
  • Jaakko Kaprio
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
  • Karri Silventoinen
    • 7
  1. 1.Monell Chemical Senses CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Food and Environmental SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of Public HealthUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Department of Psychological & Brain SciencesIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Abuse ServicesNational Institute for Health and WelfareHelsinkiFinland
  6. 6.Institute for Molecular MedicineUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  7. 7.Population Research Unit, Department of Social ResearchUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations