Sex Differences in Semantic Categorization
- 612 Downloads
Sex differences in certain cognitive abilities, including aspects of semantic processing, are well established. However, there have been no reports investigating a sex difference in semantic categorization. A total of 55 men and 58 women each judged 25 exemplars of natural categories (e.g., fruits) and 25 of artifact categories (e.g., tools) as a nonmember, partial member, or full member of the given category. Participants also rated confidence for each judgment. Women provided a greater number of vague (partial member) judgments whereas men provided more inclusive (full member) judgments of artifacts but more exclusive (nonmember) judgments of natural categories. The sex difference in vagueness was observed across domains (Cohen’s d = .56). Confidence predicted categorization among both men and women, such that more confident participants exhibited fewer vague category judgments. However, men and women were equally confident in their category judgments, and confidence failed to explain the sex difference in categorization. Men and women appear to categorize the same common objects in systematically different ways.
KeywordsArtifacts and natural kinds Semantic categorization Sex differences
This study was funded by the Undergraduate Research Scholarship Scheme (URS) at the University of Warwick.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kimura, D. (2002). Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern. Neuroendocrinology Letters Special Issue, 23(Suppl. 4), 67–77.Google Scholar
- Kolb, B., & Wishaw, I. Q. (1985). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (2nd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
- Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar