Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 449–456 | Cite as

Pornography Use and Closeness with Others in Men

Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the association between pornography use and aspects of socioemotional closeness in a non-clinical sample of 164 males. Participants’ actual and ideal socioemotional closeness was measured by the Perceived Interpersonal Closeness Scale (PICS; Popovic et al., 2003) while their pornography use was examined by the Background and Pornography Use Information Questionnaire (Popovic, 2009). Potential effects of these variables on each other as well as various findings concerning pornography consumption and related attitudes are presented. The results showed that there was no significant difference between self-reported pornography users and non-users in terms of specific socioemotional closeness with the most significant adults in their lives (i.e., partners, closest friends, mothers, and fathers). However, pornography users had significantly higher total closeness scores than non-users, showing possibly a craving for intimacy among pornography users versus non-pornography users. This “intimacy motive” and relevant and controversial findings are discussed.

Keywords

Closeness Intimacy Pornography Pornography users Pornography non-users 

References

  1. Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology. Chichester: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, K. (1997). Adult attachment processes: Individual and couple perspectives. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70, 249–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bensimon, P. (2007). The role of pornography in sexual offending. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 14, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergner, R. M., & Bridges, A. J. (2002). The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 193–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berne, E. (1971). Sex in human loving. London: Andre Deutsch Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnett, P. C., & Demnar, W. J. (1996). The relationship between closeness to significant others and self-esteem. Journal of Family Studies, 2, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiou, W.-B. (2006). Adolescents’ sexual self-disclosure on the internet: Deindividuation and impression management. Adolescence, 41, 547–561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciclitira, K. (2002). Researching pornography and sexual bodies. Psychologist, 15, 191–194.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, I. (2006). Western heterosexual masculinity, anxiety and web porn. Journal of Men’s Studies, 14, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, A., Scherer, C. R., Boies, S. C., & Gordon, B. L. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to the pathological expression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond, M. (1999). The effects of pornography: An international perspective. In J. Elias, V. Diehl Elias, V. L. Bullough, G. Brewer, J. J. Douglas, & W. Jarvis (Eds.), Porn 101: Eroticism, pornography, and the first amendment (pp. 223–260). New York: Prometheus Book.Google Scholar
  14. Faul, P., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analysis for MS-DOS (Computer program). Bonn, FRG: Deparment of Psychology, Bonn University.Google Scholar
  15. Featherstone, L. (2005). You, me and PORN make three. Psychology Today, 5, 82–86.Google Scholar
  16. Geddes & Grosset (Publishers). (1999). New English dictionary and thesaurus. New Lanark: Children’s Leisure Products Limited.Google Scholar
  17. Green, R. (1980). Variant forms of human sexual behavior. In C. Austin & R. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals (Vol. 8, pp. 68–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardy, S. (1998). The reader, the author, his woman and her lover: Soft-core pornography and heterosexual men. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  20. Herald, M. B. (2006, October 13). Pornography: A deadly addiction. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://www.mbherald.com/45/13/pornography.en.html.
  21. Hite, S. (2000). The new Hite report. The revolutionary report on female sexuality updated. London: Hamlyn.Google Scholar
  22. Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1983). The quality of social support: Measures of family and work relationships. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 157–162.Google Scholar
  23. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology. London: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  24. Howitt, D. (1995). Paedophiles and sexual offences against children. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy, personal relationship in modern societies. Oxford: Polity Press & Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Kutchinsky, B. (1985). Pornography and its effects in Denmark and the United States. Comparative Social Research, 8, 301–330.Google Scholar
  27. Kutchinsky, B. (1991). Pornography and rape: Theory and practice? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 47–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Love, B. (1999). Encyclopaedia of unusual sex practices. London: Greenwich Editions.Google Scholar
  29. Marks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Meanings of closeness and intimacy in friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marriott, E. (2003, Nov 8). Men and porn. The Guardian. [Electronic version]. Retrieved Nov 20, 2006, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,1079016,00.html.
  31. McAdams, D. P. (1988). Personal needs and personal relationships. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships; Theory, research and interventions (pp. 7–22). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. McCarthy, G. (1999). Attachment style and adult love relationships and friendships: A study of a group of women at risk of experiencing relationship difficulties. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72, 305–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, R. S., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 514–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milne, L. D. (1999). Social therapy: A guide to social support interventions for mental health practitioners. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  36. Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., & Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 211–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pett, M. A. (1997). Non-parametric statistics for health care research: Statistics for small samples and unusual distributions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Popovic, M. (2005). Intimacy and its relevance in human functioning. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Popovic, M. (2006). Psychosexual diversity as the best representation of human normality across cultures. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Popovic, M. (2007). Establishing new breeds of (sex) offenders: Science or political control? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Popovic, M. (2009). Pornography use and attitudes towards pornography and the opposite gender. Sexologia Integral, 6, 110–123.Google Scholar
  42. Popovic, M., Milne, D., & Barrett, P. (2003). The scale of perceived interpersonal closeness. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10, 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Power, M. J., Champion, L. A., & Aris, S. J. (1988). The development of a measure of social support: The Significant Others Scale (SOS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 349–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rinehart, N. J., & McCabe, M. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of hypersexuality. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 13, 369–384.Google Scholar
  45. Schaefer, M. T., & Olson, D. H. (1981). Assessing intimacy: The PAIR Inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seto, M. C., Maric, A., & Barbaree, H. E. (2001). The role of pornography in the etiology of sexual aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. SPSS. (1998). SPSS base 8.0 application guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  49. Sternberg, R. J., & Barnes, M. L. (1985). Real and ideal others in romantic relationship: Is four a crowd? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1586–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Træen, B., Spitznogle, K., & Beverfjord, A. (2004). Attitudes and use of pornography in the Norwegian population 2002. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 193–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological ServicesCumbria Partnership NHS Foundation TrustCarliseUK

Personalised recommendations