Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 343–349 | Cite as

Individual Differences in Women’s Rape Avoidance Behaviors

  • William F. McKibbin
  • Todd K. Shackelford
  • Emily J. Miner
  • Vincent M. Bates
  • James R. Liddle
Original Paper


Rape can exact severe psychological, physical, and reproductive costs on women, and likely was a recurrent adaptive problem over human evolutionary history. Therefore, women may have evolved psychological mechanisms that motivate rape avoidance behaviors. Guided heuristically by an evolutionary perspective, we tested the hypothesis that women’s rape avoidance behaviors would vary with several individual difference variables. Specifically, we predicted that rape avoidance behaviors would covary positively with (1) women’s attractiveness, (2) women’s involvement in a committed romantic relationship, and (3) the number of family members living nearby. We also predicted that women’s rape avoidance behaviors would covary negatively with age. We administered the Rape Avoidance Inventory (McKibbin et al., Pers Indiv Differ 39:336–340, 2009) and a demographic survey to a sample of women (n = 144). The results of correlational and regression analyses were consistent with the predictions, with the exception that women’s rape avoidance behaviors did not covary with women’s age. Discussion highlighted limitations of the current research and directions for future research on women’s rape avoidance psychology and behaviors.


Sexual coercion Rape Rape avoidance Evolved psychological mechanisms 


  1. Bröder, A., & Hohmann, N. (2003). Variations in risk-taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chavanne, T. J., & Gallup, G. G. (1998). Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Felson, R., & Krohn, M. (1990). Motives for rape. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 222–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Figueredo, A. J., Corral-Verdugob, V., Frías-Armentab, M., Bacharc, K. J., Whited, J., McNeilla, P. L., et al. (2001). Blood, solidarity, status, and honor: The sexual balance of power and spousal abuse in Sonora, Mexico. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 195–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghiglieri, M. P. (2000). The dark side of man: Tracing the origins of male violence. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  9. Greenfield, L. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kilpatrick, D., Edmunds, C., & Seymour, A. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center.Google Scholar
  12. Lalumiére, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Bates, V., Starratt, V. G., & Miner, E. (2009). Development and initial validation of the Rape Avoidance Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Starratt, V. G. (2008). Why do men rape? An evolutionary psychological perspective. Review of General Psychology, 12, 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, N. M., & Udry, J. R. (1970). Variations in pedometer activity during the menstrual cycle. Sensory Processing, 2, 90–98.Google Scholar
  17. Morris, N. M., & Udry, J. R. (1982). Epidemiological patterns of sexual behavior in the menstrual cycle. In R. C. Friedman (Ed.), Behavior and the menstrual cycle (pp. 129–153). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  18. Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The daughter-guarding hypothesis: Parental influence on, and emotional reactions to, offspring’s mating behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 217–233.Google Scholar
  19. Perkins, C., & Klaus, P. (1996). Criminal victimization 1994. National crime victimization survey. Bulletin. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Perkins, C., Klaus, P., Bastian, L., & Cohen, R. (1996). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1993. National crime victimization survey report. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Thornhill, N. (1996). Psychological adaptation to sexual coercion in victims and offenders. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict (pp. 90–104). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. P. (2000). A natural history of rape. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thornhill, N., & Thornhill, R. (1990). Evolutionary analysis of psychological pain of rape victims. I. The effects of victim’s age and marital status. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. (1992). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 363–375.Google Scholar
  27. Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson, M., & Mesnick, S. L. (1997). An empirical test of the bodyguard hypothesis. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 505–511). New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • William F. McKibbin
    • 1
  • Todd K. Shackelford
    • 1
  • Emily J. Miner
    • 1
  • Vincent M. Bates
    • 1
  • James R. Liddle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityDavieUSA

Personalised recommendations