Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 551–557 | Cite as

Voice Correlates of Mating Success in Men: Examining “Contests” Versus “Mate Choice” Modes of Sexual Selection

  • Carolyn R. Hodges-Simeon
  • Steven J. C. Gaulin
  • David A. Puts
Original Paper


Men’s copulatory success can often be predicted by measuring traits involved in male contests and female choice. Previous research has demonstrated relationships between one such vocal trait in men, mean fundamental frequency (F 0), and the outcomes and indicators of sexual success with women. The present study investigated the role of another vocal parameter, F 0 variation (the within-subject SD in F 0 across the utterance, F 0-SD), in predicting men’s reported number of female sexual partners in the last year. Male participants (N = 111) competed with another man for a date with a woman. Recorded interactions with the competitor (“competitive recording”) and the woman (“courtship recording”) were analyzed for five non-linguistic vocal parameters: F 0-SD, mean F 0, intensity, duration, and formant dispersion (D f , an acoustic correlate of vocal tract length), as well as dominant and attractive linguistic content. After controlling for age and attitudes toward uncommitted sex (SOI), lower F 0-SD (i.e., a more monotone voice) and more dominant linguistic content were strong predictors of the number of past-year sexual partners, whereas mean F 0 and D f did not significantly predict past-year partners. These contrasts have implications for the relative importance of male contests and female choice in shaping men’s mating success and hence the origins and maintenance of sexually dimorphic traits in humans.


Dominance Formant dispersion Fundamental frequency Mate choice Mating success Voice pitch 



We would like to thank Lisa Brevard, Christina Jerzyk, Jerome Lee, Rebecca Prosser, John Putz, Melinda Putz, and Linda Snyder for their conscientious assistance in study preparation and data collection; Julio Gonzalez and Drew Rendall for their advice on measuring formant frequencies; Kittie Verdolini for providing research support; and the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions regarding this article.


  1. Alcock, J. (2005). Animal behavior. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biology Letters, 3, 682–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 7, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boersma, P., & Weenik, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.03) [Computer program]. Retrieved March 21, 2009, from
  7. Brend, R. M. (1975). Male–female intonation patterns in American English. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 84–87). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review., 17, 605–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charous, S. J., Kempster, G., Manders, E., & Ristanovic, R. (2001). The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on the voice. Laryngoscope, 111, 2028–2031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60, 773–780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly, N., & Warren, P. (2001). Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of Man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies affect the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Smith, M. J. L., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitch, W. T. (1997). Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1213–1222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goedeking, P. (1988). Vocal play behavior in cotton-top tamarins. In D. Todt, P. Goedeking, & D. Symmes (Eds.), Primate vocal communication (pp. 133–144). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. González, J. (2004). Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: A weak relationship in adult humans. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossman, C. (1985). Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. Science, 227, 257–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harries, M., Walker, J., Williams, D., Hawkins, S., & Hughes, I. (1997). Changes in the male voice at puberty. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 77, 445–447.Google Scholar
  26. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Perceptions of dominance and attractiveness are related to different vocal parameters. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, S., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes, S., & Gallup, G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder-to-hip and waist-to-hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keating, C. (1985). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazur, A., Halpern, C., & Udry, J. R. (1994). Dominant looking male teenagers copulate earlier. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, D. I. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., et al. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on sexual attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005
  41. Puts, D., Gaulin, S., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cardenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 340–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 575–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminate validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Christensen, P. N., & Leck, K. (1999). Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 159–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swaddle, J., & Reierson, G. (2002). Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 269, 2285–2289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Titze, I. R. (1994). Principles of voice production. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. G. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  51. Xue, S. A., & Hao, G. J. (2003). Changes in the human vocal tract due to aging and the acoustic correlates of speech production: A pilot study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 689–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn R. Hodges-Simeon
    • 1
  • Steven J. C. Gaulin
    • 1
  • David A. Puts
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations