Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 1261–1273 | Cite as

Infants’ Preferences for Toys, Colors, and Shapes: Sex Differences and Similarities

Original Paper

Abstract

Girls and boys differ in their preferences for toys such as dolls and trucks. These sex differences are present in infants, are seen in non-human primates, and relate, in part, to prenatal androgen exposure. This evidence of inborn influences on sex-typed toy preferences has led to suggestions that object features, such as the color or the shape of toys, may be of intrinsically different interest to males and females. We used a preferential looking task to examine preferences for different toys, colors, and shapes in 120 infants, ages 12, 18, or 24 months. Girls looked at dolls significantly more than boys did and boys looked at cars significantly more than girls did, irrespective of color, particularly when brightness was controlled. These outcomes did not vary with age. There were no significant sex differences in infants’ preferences for different colors or shapes. Instead, both girls and boys preferred reddish colors over blue and rounded over angular shapes. These findings augment prior evidence of sex-typed toy preferences in infants, but suggest that color and shape do not determine these sex differences. In fact, the direction of influence could be the opposite. Girls may learn to prefer pink, for instance, because the toys that they enjoy playing with are often colored pink. Regarding within sex differences, as opposed to differences between boys and girls, both boys and girls preferred dolls to cars at age 12-months. The preference of young boys for dolls over cars suggests that older boys’ avoidance of dolls may be acquired. Similarly, the sex similarities in infants’ preferences for colors and shapes suggest that any subsequent sex differences in these preferences may arise from socialization or cognitive gender development rather than inborn factors.

Keywords

Sex Gender Infants Toy preference Color preference Shape preference 

References

  1. Adams, R. J. (1987). An evaluation of color preference in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. M. (2003). An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: Pink, blue and the brain. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 7–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, G. M. (2006). Associations among gender-linked toy preferences, spatial ability, and digit ratios: Evidence from an eye-tracking analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 699–709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (1994). Gender labels and play styles: Their relative contribution to children’s selection of playmates. Child Development, 65, 869–879.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to children’s toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, R., & Woods, R. (2009). Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 427–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aronoff, J., Barclay, A. M., & Stevenson, L. A. (1988). The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 647–655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aronoff, J., Woike, B. A., & Hyman, L. M. (1992). Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1050–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Hackett, G., & Hines, M. (2009). Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychological Science, 20, 144–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17, 645–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender-schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berenbaum, S. A., & Hines, M. (1992). Early androgens are related to childhood sex-typed toy preferences. Psychological Science, 3, 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bornstein, M. H. (1975). Qualities of color vision in infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 401–419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bornstein, M. H. (1985). Human infant color-vision and color perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caldera, Y. M., & Sciaraffa, M. A. (1998). Parent-toddler play with feminine toys: Are all dolls the same? Sex Roles, 3, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, A., Shirley, L., Heywood, C., & Crook, C. (2000). Infants’ visual preference for sex-congruent babies, children, toys and activities: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiu, S. W., Gervan, S., Fairbrother, C., Johnson, L. L., Owen-Anderson, A. F. H., Bradley, S. J., & Zucker, K. J. (2006). Sex-dimorphic color preference in children with gender identity disorder: A comparison to clinical and community controls. Sex Roles, 55, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, L. B., DeLoache, J. S., & Strauss, M. S. (1979). Infant visual perception. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 393–438). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franck, K., & Rosen, E. (1949). A projective test of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 247–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Franklin, A., Pitchford, N., Mahony, L., & Davies, I. R. (2006, June). Color preferences in infancy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the XVth Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Westin Miyako, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. Golombok, S., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in social behavior. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 117–136). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Golombok, S., Rust, J., Zervoulis, K., Croudace, T., Golding, J., & Hines, M. (2008). Developmental trajectories of sex-typed behavior in boys and girls: A longitudinal general population study of children aged 2.5–8 years. Child Development, 79, 1583–1593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartup, W. W., Moore, S. G., & Sager, G. (1963). Avoidance of inappropriate sex-typing by young children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 467–473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassett, J. M., Siebert, E. R., & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 359–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hines, M., & Alexander, G. M. (2008). Monkeys, girls, boys and toys: A confirmation [Letter to the editor]. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 478–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hines, M., Golombok, S., Rust, J., Johnston, K. J., Golding, J., & The ALSPAC Study Team. (2002). Testosterone during pregnancy and gender role behavior of preschool children: A longitudinal, population study. Child Development, 73, 1678–1687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17, 623–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Arai, Y. (2001). Sex differences in children’s free drawings: A study of girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behaviour, 40, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Dolezal, C., Baker, S. W., Carlson, A. D., Obeid, J. S., & New, M. I. (2004). Prenatal androgenization affects gender-related behavior but not gender identity in 5-12-year-old girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 97–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mischel, W. (1966). A social learning view of sex differences in behaviour. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 58–81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Moller, L. C., & Serbin, L. A. (1996). Antecedents of toddler gender segregation: Cognitive consonance, gender-typed toy preferences and behavioral compatibility. Sex Roles, 35, 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Lansky, L. M. (1976). A sex difference in shape preference. Journal of Social Psychology, 98, 139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nordenstrom, A., Servin, A., Bohlin, G., Larsson, A., & Wedell, A. (2002). Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with degree of prenatal androgen exposure assessed by CYP21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 87, 5119–5124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. OPCS and Employment Department Group. (1991). Standard classification of occupations. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  44. Pasterski, V. L., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., & Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennell, G. E. (1994). Babes in toyland: Learning an ideology of gender. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 359–364.Google Scholar
  46. Perry, L. C., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex difference: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1699–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Picariello, M. L., Greenberg, D. N., & Pillemer, D. (1990). Children’s sex related stereotyping of colors. Child Development, 61, 1453–1460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pomerleau, A., Bolduc, D., Malcuit, G., & Cossette, L. (1990). Pink or blue: Environmental gender stereotypes in the first 2 years of life. Sex Roles, 22, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quadagno, D. M., Briscoe, R., & Quadagno, J. S. (1977). Effects of perinatal gonadal hormones on selected nonsexual behavior patterns: A critical assessment of the nonhuman and human literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 62–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 858–932). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Ruble, D. N., Taylor, L. J., Cyphers, L., Greulich, F. K., Lurye, L. E., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). The role of gender constancy in early gender development. Child Development, 78, 1121–1136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Servin, A., Nordenstrom, A., Larsson, A., & Bohlin, G. (2003). Prenatal androgens and gender-typed behavior: A study of girls with mild and severe forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology, 39, 440–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Snow, M. E., Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1983). Sex-of-child differences in father-child interaction at one year of age. Child Development, 49, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams, C. L., & Pleil, K. E. (2008). Toy story: Why do monkey and human males prefer trucks? Hormones and Behavior, 54, 355–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zentner, M. R. (2001). Preferences for colours and colour emotion combinations in early childhood. Developmental Science, 4, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Family Research, Faculty of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations