Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 587–590 | Cite as

A Critique of the Proposed DSM-V Diagnosis of Pedophilia

Letter to the Editor

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author is an advisor to the DSM-V Workgroup on Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders (Chair, Kenneth J. Zucker, Ph.D.).

References

  1. Abel, G. G., Becker, J., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleou, J. L., & Murphy, W. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (2009). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9536-0.
  4. Levenson, J. S. (2004). Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 357–369.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Marques, J. K., Miederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. O’Donohue, W., Regev, L., & Hagstrom, A. (2000). Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations