Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 429–439 | Cite as

Perceived Consequences of Casual Online Sexual Activities on Heterosexual Relationships: A U.S. Online Survey

  • Christian Grov
  • Brian Joseph Gillespie
  • Tracy Royce
  • Janet Lever
Original Paper

Abstract

Some researchers have illustrated how the Internet can provide users with an ideal atmosphere to explore sexuality; however, most have stressed the Internet’s negative impact on intimate relationships. Notably, much of this research has focused on the small minority of men who compulsively engage in online sexual activities (OSA), overlooking the majority of men and women who use OSA recreationally (either individually or with a partner). Addressing these limitations, data on heterosexual adults in committed relationships were taken from the 2004 “ELLE/msnbc.com Cyber-sex and Romance Survey” (n = 8,376). In quantitative analyses, men were less likely than women to express concerns and more likely to hold favorable attitudes about their partner’s OSA. With regard to the impact of OSA on intimate relationships, men and women did not differ in becoming “more open to new things,” and finding it easier “to talk about what [they] want sexually.” Negative impacts were also identified, with women more likely to indicate they had less sex as a result of a partner’s OSA, and men more likely to indicate they were less aroused by real sex as a result of their own OSA. Generally, qualitative results mirrored quantitative ones. Additionally, qualitative data suggested that moderate or light amounts of OSA yield relationship benefits for both female and male users, including increases in the quality and frequency of sex, and increased intimacy with real partners. In addition, men who used the Internet moderately, and men and women who reported being light users, stated that engaging in tandem OSA fostered better sexual communication with partners. Findings underscore the need to explore further the impact that online sexual activities can have on real-life committed relationships.

Keywords

Internet Sexuality Cybersex Pornography Heterosexuals Relationships 

References

  1. Albright, J. M. (2008). Sex in America online: An exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in Internet sex seeking and its impacts. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 175–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsden, D. (2003). Not tonight, honey. I’m logging on. Internet porn Is everywhere; even “nice” guys are hooked. So where does that leave their girlfriends? New York Magazine. Available at http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9349/.
  3. Barak, A., & King, S. A. (2000). The two faces of the internet: Introduction to the special issue on the internet and sexuality. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benotsch, E. G., Kalichman, S. C., & Cage, M. (2002). Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: Prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 177–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergner, R. M., & Bridges, A. J. (2002). The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 193–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostwick, J. M., & Bucci, J. A. (2008). Internet sex addiction treated with naltrexone. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 83, 226–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridges, A. J., Bergner, R. M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003). Romantic partners’ use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29, 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, A. (Ed.). (2002). Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, A., Galbreath, N., & Becker, M. A. (2004). Sex on the Internet: Furthering our understanding of men with online sexual problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 223–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, A., Putnam, D. E., Planchon, L. A., & Boies, S. C. (1999). Online sexual compulsivity: Getting tangled in the net. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 6, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, A., Scherer, C. R., Boies, S. C., & Gordon, B. L. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elle Staff. (2004, June). Girls gone wired. Elle, pp. 98–100.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  16. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, M. (2000). Excessive internet use: Implications for sexual behavior. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grov, C., Bamonte, A. B., Fuentes, A., Parsons, J. T., Bimbi, D. S., & Morgenstern, J. (2008). Exploring the Internet’s role in sexual compulsivity and out of control sexual thoughts/behaviour: A qualitative study of gay and bisexual men in New York City. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 10, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Healey, J. F. (2009). Statistics: A tool for social research (8th ed.). Florence, KY: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  20. Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. Family Journal, 14, 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalichman, S. C., Benotsch, E. G., Weinhardt, L. S., Austin, J., & Luke, W. (2002). Internet use among people living with HIV/AIDS: Association of health information, health behaviors, and health status. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 51–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lever, J., Grov, C., Royce, T., & Gillespie, B. (2008). Searching for love in all the “write” places: Exploring Internet personals use by sexual orientation, gender, and age. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 233–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of Internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 13, 131–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meerkerk, G. J., Van Den Eijnden, R. J., & Garretsen, H. F. (2006). Predicting compulsive Internet use: It’s all about sex! CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9, 95–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. (2005). A decade of adoption: How the Internet has woven itself into American life. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/148/report_display.asp.
  26. Ropelato, J. (2007). Internet pornography statistics. Available at http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html.
  27. Ross, M. W. (2005). Typing, doing, and being: Sexuality and the Internet. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 342–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider, J. P. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider, J. P. (2003). The impact of compulsive cybersex behaviors on the family. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Southern, S. (2008). Treatment of compulsive cybersex behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31, 697–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 569–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful Internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Grov
    • 1
  • Brian Joseph Gillespie
    • 2
  • Tracy Royce
    • 3
  • Janet Lever
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Health and Nutrition SciencesBrooklyn College of the City University of New YorkBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyCalifornia State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations