Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 419–426 | Cite as

Is a Diagnostic Category for Paraphilic Coercive Disorder Defensible?

Original Paper

Abstract

There is a proposal to establish a paraphilic coercive disorder as a new paraphilia in the DSM-V. The empirical data do not, however, support the hypothesis that a distinct syndrome exists that comprises males who are sexually aroused by the coercive elements of rape per se. Purported evidence for this syndrome has centered on the results of phallometric studies. Higher plethysmographic responses of rapists to coercive rape scenarios may, however, be better explained by the failure of coercive elements to inhibit arousal to sexual aspects of the stimuli rather than by arousal specifically to the coercive elements. In addition, sexual fantasies about forcing sex and about struggling victims are highly correlated with sadistic fantasies and have not been shown to identify a syndrome that can be discriminated from sadism. Finally, taxometric evidence strongly supports the hypothesis that the underlying components of rape are distributed as dimensions and do not constitute a separate taxon. Consequently, the criteria purported to categorize rapists into the proposed syndrome would have to be arbitrarily determined. Not only does there seem to be little empirical justification for the creation of this new syndrome, the inclusion of this disorder among the paraphilias would have serious potential for misuse. It would imply endorsement of Paraphilia, NOS, nonconsent, which is currently inappropriately employed in civil commitment proceedings to justify commitment.

Keywords

Paraphilias Paraphilic coercive disorder Sadism DSM-V 

References

  1. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., & Ross, L. T. (1998). Sexual assault perpetration by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 167–195.Google Scholar
  2. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., Clinton, A., & Buck, P. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 784–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Guild, D. (1977). The components of rapists’ sexual arousal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 895–903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittelman, M., & Rouleau, J. (1988). Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 153–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Abel, G. G., & Blanchard, E. B. (1974). The role of fantasy in the treatment of sexual deviation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 467–475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Abel, G. G., & Osborn, C. A. (1992). The paraphilias: The extent and nature of sexually deviant and criminal behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 675–687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Abel, G. G., & Rouleau, J. L. (1990). The nature and extent of sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 9–12). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1991). The role of male sexual arousal in rape: Six models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 621–630.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbaree, H. E., Marshall, W. L., & Lanthier, R. D. (1979). Deviant sexual arousal in rapists. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17, 215–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Serin, R. C., Amos, N. L., & Preston, D. L. (1994). Comparisons between sexual and nonsexual rapist subtypes: Sexual arousal to rape, offence precursors, and offense characteristics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernat, J. A., Calhoun, K. S., & Adams, H. E. (1999). Sexually aggressive and nonaggressive men: Sexual arousal and judgments in response to acquaintance rape and consensual analogues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 662–673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Casey, E. A., Beadnell, B., & Lindhorst, T. P. (2009). Predictors of sexually coercive behavior in a nationally representative sample of adolescent males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1129–1147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, M. L., Garafalo, R. F., Boucher, R., & Seghorn, T. (1971). The psychology of the rapist. Seminars in Psychiatry, 3, 307–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Daversa, M., & Knight, R. A. (2007). A structural examination of the predictors of sexual coercion against children in adolescent sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1313–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Earls, C. M., & Proulx, J. (1986). The differentiation of francophone rapists and non-rapists using penile circumferential measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edens, J. F., Marcus, D. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 131–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, L. (1993). Rape as a biosocial phenomenon. In G. C. Nagayama Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology and assessment, treatment and policy (pp. 17–41). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  19. First, M. B., & Halon, R. L. (2008). Use of DSM paraphilia diagnosis in sexually violent predator commitment cases. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 36, 443–454.Google Scholar
  20. Freund, K. (1988). Courtship disorder: Is this hypothesis valid? In R. A. Prentky & V. Quinsey (Eds.), Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (Vol. 528, pp. 172–182). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  21. Freund, K. (1990). Courtship disorder. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), The handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 195–207). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Freund, K., Scher, H., & Hucker, S. (1983). The courtship disorders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 369–379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Freund, K., Scher, H., & Hucker, S. (1984). The courtship disorders: A further investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 133–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Freund, K., Scher, H., Racansky, I. G., Campbell, K., & Heasman, G. (1986). Males disposed to commit rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 23–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Freund, K., Seeley, H. R., Marshall, W., & Glinfort, E. K. (1972). Sexual offenders needing special assessment and/or therapy. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 14, 345–365.Google Scholar
  26. Fuller, A. K., Fuller, A. E., & Blashfield, R. K. (1990). Paraphilic coercive disorder. Journal of Sex, Education & Therapy, 16, 164–171.Google Scholar
  27. Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom, L. L. (1977). Rape: Power, anger, and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239–1243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Guay, J. P., Ruscio, J., Knight, R. A., & Hare, R. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: Evidence for dimensionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 701–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, J. R., & Benning, S. D. (2006). The “successful” psychopath: Adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 459–478). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hare, R. D. (2003). The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised technical manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  31. Harris, G. T. (1998, October). Psychopathy and sexual deviance. Paper presented at the Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Hilton, N. Z., Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (2007). Coercive and precocious sexuality as a fundamental aspect of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 1–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). Psychopathy as a taxon: Evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 387–397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hazelwood, R. R. (1987). Analyzing the rape and profiling the offender. In R. R. Hazelwood & A. W. Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 169–199). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The sexual Inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological responses patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kafka, M. P. (1997). Hypersexual desire in males: An operational definition and clinical implications for males with paraphilias and paraphilia-related disorders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 505–526.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kafka, M. P. (2003). Sex offending and sexual appetite: The clinical and theoretical relevance of hypersexual desire. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 47, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kafka, M. P., & Hennen, J. (2003). Hypersexual desire in males: Are males with paraphilias different from males with paraphilia-related disorders? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Knight, R. A. (1999). Validation of a typology for rapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knight, R. A. (2009). Typologies for rapists: The generation of a new structural model. In A. Schlank (Ed.), The sexual predator (Vol. 4, Chapter 17, pp. 1–28). New York: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Knight, R. A., & Cerce, D. D. (1999). Validation and revision of the Multidimensional Assessment of Sex and Aggression. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 187–213.Google Scholar
  43. Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), The handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23–52). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  44. Knight, R. A., Prentky, R. A., & Cerce, D. D. (1994). The development, reliability, and validity of an inventory for the Multidimensional Assessment of Sex and Aggression. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knight, R. A., Ronis, S., Prentky, R. A., & Kafka, M. (2009). The role of sexual motivation in sexually coercive behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar
  46. Knight, R. A., Rosenberg, R., & Schneider, B. (1985). Classification of sexual offenders: Perspectives, methods, and validation. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Research handbook on rape and sexual assault (pp. 222–293). New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Knight, R. A., & Sims-Knight, J. E. (2003). Developmental antecedents of sexual coercion against women: Testing of alternative hypotheses with structural equation modeling. In R. A. Prentky, E. Janus, & M. Seto (Eds.), Sexual coercion: Understanding and management (pp. 72–85). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  48. Knight, R. A., & Sims-Knight, J. E. (2004). Testing an etiological model for male juvenile sexual offending against females. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13, 33–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1988). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. In R. A. Prentky & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.), Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (pp. 133–147). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  50. Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: A dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 537–550.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The discriminability of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 150–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lalumière, M. L., Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Trautrimas, C. (2003). Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometric assessments? In R. A. Prentky, E. Janus, & M. Seto (Eds.), Sexual coercion: Understanding and management (pp. 211–224). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  53. Langevin, R., Bain, J., Ben-Aron, M. H., Coulthard, R., & Day, D. (1985). Sexual aggression: Constructing a prediction equation. A controlled pilot study. In R. Langevin (Ed.), Erotic preference, gender identity, and aggression in men: New research studies (pp. 39–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Lilienfeld, S. O. (1994). Conceptual problems in the assessment of psychopathy. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lohr, B. A., Adams, H. E., & Davis, J. M. (1997). Sexual arousal to erotic and aggressive stimuli in sexually coercive and noncoercive men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 230–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lussier, P., Leclerc, B., Cale, J., & Proulx, J. (2007). Developmental pathways of deviance in sexual aggressors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1441–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Malamuth, N. M. (1998). An evolutionary-based model integrating research on the characteristics of sexually coercive men. In J. Adair, K. Dion, & D. Belanger (Eds.), Advances in psychological science (Vol. 2): Personal, social, and developmental aspects (pp. 151–184). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  58. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcus, D. K., John, S. L., & Edens, J. F. (2004). A taxometric analysis of psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 626–635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Marcus, D. K., Sanford, G. M., Edens, J. F., Knight, R. K., & Walters, G. D. (in press). Taxometrics and evolutionary theory: The case of the psychopathic sexuality taxon. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. Google Scholar
  62. Marshall, W. L. (1989). Intimacy, loneliness and sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 491–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Marshall, W. L., & Hucker, S. J. (2006). Issues in the diagnosis of sexual sadism. Sexual Offender Treatment, 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
  64. Marshall, W. L., & Kennedy, P. (2003). Sexual sadism in sexual offenders: An elusive diagnosis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meehl, P. E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266–275.Google Scholar
  66. MIDSA Clinical Manual. (2008). Bend, OR: Augur Enterprises, Inc. Available at www.midsa.us.
  67. Prentky, R. A., Janus, E., Barbaree, H., Schwartz, B. K., & Kafka, M. P. (2006). Sexually violent predators in the courtroom: Science on trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 357–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643–661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Preston, D. L. (1996). Patterns of sexual arousal among rapist subtypes. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 56(11-B), 6445.Google Scholar
  70. Proulx, J. (2001, November). Sexual preferences and personality disorders of MTC:R3 rapist subtypes. Symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  71. Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1984). Stimulus control of rapists’ and non-sex offenders’ sexual arousal. Behavioral Assessment, 6, l69–l76.Google Scholar
  72. Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Upfold, D. (1984). Sexual arousal to nonsexual violence and sadomachistic themes among rapists and non-sex-offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 651–657.Google Scholar
  73. Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Varney, G. (1981). A comparison of rapists’ and non-sex offenders’ sexual preferences for mutually consenting sex, rape, and physical abuse of women. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 127–135.Google Scholar
  74. Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  75. Senn, C. Y., Desmarais, S., Verberg, N., & Wood, E. (2000). Predicting coercive sexual behavior across the lifespan in a random sample of Canadian men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seto, M. C., & Kuban, M. (1996). Criterion-related validity of a phallometric test for paraphilic rape and sadism. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 175–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Sitnikov, L., Goldberg, J., Daversa, M. T., & Knight, R. A. (2007, April). The interplay of the factors of psychopathy and borderline personality disorder in predicting violence in sexual offenders. Poster presented at the Biannual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy, St. Petersburg, FL.Google Scholar
  78. Skilling, T. A., Quinsey, V. L., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Evidence of a taxon underlying serious antisocial behavior in boys. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 450–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vasey, M. W., Kotov, R., Frick, P. J., & Loney, B. R. (2005). The latent structure of psychopathy in youth: A taxometric investigation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 411–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Walters, G. D., Brinkley, C. A., Magaletta, P. R., & Diamond, P. M. (2008). Taxometric analysis of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 491–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Walters, G. D., Duncan, S. A., & Mitchell-Perez, K. (2007). The latent structure of psychopathy: A taxometric investigation of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in a heterogeneous sample of male prison inmates. Assessment, 14, 270–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Walters, G. D., Gray, N., Jackson, R., Sewell, K., Rogers, R., Taylor, J., et al. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV): Further evidence of dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 19, 330–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Walters, G. D., Marcus, D. K., Edens, J. F., Knight, R. A., & Sanford, G. M. (2009). In search of the psychopathic sexuality taxon: Indicator size does matter. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  84. Zakireh, B., Ronis, S. T., & Knight, R. A. (2008). Individual beliefs, attitudes, and victimization histories of male juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychiatric Association 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, MS 062Brandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations