Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 1091–1104 | Cite as

Validation of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women and Men

  • Robin R. Milhausen
  • Cynthia A. Graham
  • Stephanie A. Sanders
  • William L. Yarber
  • Scott B. Maitland
Original Paper


The purpose of the current investigation was to develop a scale that would assess propensity for sexual arousal in response to a broad range of stimuli and sexual situations in both men and women. In Study 1, data from a nonclinical sample of 481 male and female students (graduate and undergraduate) were submitted to exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in order to develop the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women and Men (SESII-W/M), and gender differences on the subscales were tested. In Study 2, construct validity and test–retest reliability of the SESII-W/M were assessed with a second sample of undergraduate students. The resultant measurement tool was comprised of six subscales: Inhibitory Cognitions, Relationship Importance, Arousability, Partner Characteristics and Behaviors, Setting (Unusual or Unconcealed), and Dyadic Elements of the Sexual Interaction. The measure demonstrated good test–retest reliability and discriminant and convergent validity. The SESII-W/M will likely be a useful measure in investigations in which sexual inhibition and sexual excitation must be assessed identically for men and women.


Sexual arousal Sexual inhibition Sexual excitation Test validation 


  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, A., Saroiu, S., & Koutsky, L. A. (2002). Obtaining sensitive data through the Web: An example of design and methods. Epidemiology, 13, 640–645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J. (1999). Central inhibition of sexual response in the male: A theoretical perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 763–784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J., Carnes, J., Janssen, E., & Long, J. S. (2005). Erectile and ejaculatory problems in gay and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 285–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 121–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bancroft, J., Herbenick, D., Barnes, T., Hallam-Jones, R., Wylie, K., Janssen, E., et al. (2005). The relevance of the dual control model to male sexual dysfunction: The Kinsey Institute/BASRT Collaborative Project. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 571–579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Carnes, L., Goodrich, D., Strong, D., & Long, J. S. (2004). Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 181–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long, J. S. (2003). The relation between mood and sexuality in heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 217–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Basson, R. (2001). Human sex-response cycles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 33–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in the strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Fit indices, LaGrange multipliers, constraint changes, and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 163–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Brezsnyak, M., & Whisman, M. A. (2004). Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 30, 199–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Byers, E. S. (2001). Evidence for the importance of relationship satisfaction for women’s sexual functioning. Women and Therapy, 24, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carpenter, D. L., Janssen, E., Graham, C. A., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2008). Women’s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 36–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Daker-White, G. (2002). Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: A systematic review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 197–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Davidson, J. K. (1985). The utilization of sexual fantasies by sexually experienced university students. Journal of American College Health, 34, 24–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dennerstein, L., Lehert, P., & Burger, H. (2005). The relative effects of hormones and relationship factors on sexual function of women through the natural menopausal transition. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 174–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellison, C. R. (2001). A research inquiry into some American women’s sexual concerns and problems. Women and Therapy, 24, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher, W., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaither, G. A., & Sellbom, M. (2003). The Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale: Reliability and validity within a heterosexual college student sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 157–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerressu, M., Mercer, C. H., Graham, C. A., Wellings, K., & Johnson, A. M. (2008). British national probability data on masturbation prevalence and associated factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 266–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S., Milhausen, R. R., & McBride, K. (2003, November). Factors related to inhibition and excitation of sexual arousal in women. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
  31. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2006). The Sexual Excitation and Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 397–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R. R., & McBride, K. R. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartman, L. M. (1985). Attentional focus, sexual responding, and meta-cognitions. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayes, R. D., Dennerstein, L., Bennett, C., & Fairley, C. (2008). What is the “true” prevalence of female sexual dysfunctions and does the way we assess these conditions have an impact? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 777–787.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., & Stewart, A. L. (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  37. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Janssen, E., McBride, K. R., Yarber, W., Hill, B. J., & Butler, S. M. (2007). Factors that influence sexual arousal in men: A focus group study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 252–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002a). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002b). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1987). LISREL 7. A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  43. Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual Sensation Seeking and Sexual Compulsivity scales: Reliability, validity, and predicting HIV risk behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 586–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaplan, H. S. (1979). Disorders of desire. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lykins, A. D., Janssen, E., & Graham, C. A. (2006). The relationship between negative mood and sexuality in heterosexual college women and men. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 136–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. London, England: Churchill.Google Scholar
  49. McCabe, M. P. (1997). Intimacy and quality of life among sexually dysfunctional males and females. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 276–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mustanski, B. S. (2001). Getting wired: Exploiting the Internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pealer, L. N., Weiler, R. M., Pigg, R. M., Miller, D., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students. Health Education and Behavior, 28, 547–559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanders, S. A., Graham, C. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2008). Predicting sexual problems in women: The relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 241–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  56. The Working Group for a New View of Women’s Sexual Problems. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems. Women and Therapy, 24, 1–8.Google Scholar
  57. Tolman, D. L. (2001). Female adolescent sexuality: An argument for the developmental perspective on the New View of Women’s Sexual Problems. Women and Therapy, 24, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Witting, K., Santtila, P., Varjonen, M., Jern, P., Johansson, A., von der Pahlen, B., et al. (2008). Female sexual dysfunction, sexual distress, and compatibility with partner. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 2587–2599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Worthen, B. R., White, K. R., Fan, X., & Sudweeks, R. R. (1999). Measurement and assessment in schools (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin R. Milhausen
    • 1
  • Cynthia A. Graham
    • 2
  • Stephanie A. Sanders
    • 3
  • William L. Yarber
    • 4
  • Scott B. Maitland
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, Macdonald InstituteUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Oxford Doctoral Course in Clinical Psychology, Isis Education CentreWarneford HospitalOxfordUK
  3. 3.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Applied Health ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Family Relations and Applied NutritionUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations