Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 405–410 | Cite as

Coercive Paraphilic Disorder

  • Vernon L. QuinseyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Sexual coercion is a manifestation of sexual conflict that is not in itself pathological according to Wakefield’s (1992) criteria because sexual coercion can increase a man’s Darwinian fitness. There are, however, differences among men in their propensity to commit rape and this propensity is linked to antisocial personality characteristics and relatively more sexual interest in brutal rape depictions. If highly rape-prone men were to be considered pathological, it would be possible to develop diagnostic criteria to identify them.

Keywords

Rape Paraphilias Sexual coercion DSM-V 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Rick Beninger, Joe Camilleri, Grant Harris, Martin Lalumière, and Marnie Rice for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. The author is an Advisor to the DSM-V Paraphilias subworkgroup of the Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Workgroup (Chair, Kenneth J. Zucker, Ph.D.). Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V Workgroup Reports (Copyright 2009), American Psychiatric Association.

References

  1. Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2009a). Testing the cuckoldry risk hypothesis of partner sexual coercion in community and forensic samples. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 164–178.Google Scholar
  3. Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2009b). Individual differences in the propensity for partner sexual coercion. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherkas, L. F., Oelsner, E. C., Mak, Y. T., Valdes, A., & Spector, T. D. (2004). Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: A linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Twin Research, 7, 649–658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chippendale, A. K., Gibson, J. R., & Rice, W. R. (2001). Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 1671–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, L., Widmayer, A., & Palmer, C. T. (2009). Perpetrators of sexual assault continuing to have sex with their victims following the initial assault: Evidence for evolved reproductive strategies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 454–463.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. First, M. B., & Halon, R. L. (2008). Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 36, 443–454.Google Scholar
  9. Freund, K., & Seto, M. C. (1998). Preferential rape in the theory of courtship disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 433–443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830–835.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg, S. R., Firestone, P., Bradford, J. M., & Greenberg, D. M. (2002). Prediction of recidivism in exhibitionists: Psychological, phallometric, and offense factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., Hare, R. D., O’Shaughnessy, R., & Kumka, G. (2001). Psychopathy and recidivism in adolescent sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Hilton, N. Z., Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (2007). Coercive and precocious sexuality as a fundamental aspect of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 1–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hildebrand, M., de Ruiter, C., & de Vogel, V. (2004). Psychopathy and sexual deviance in treated rapists: Association with sexual and nonsexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson, A., Santitila, P., Harlaar, N., von der Pahlen, B., Witting, K., Algars, M., et al. (2008). Genetic effects on male sexual coercion. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 190–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanazawa, S. (2003). Why productivity fades with age: The crime-genius connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanazawa, S., & Still, M. C. (2000). Why men commit crimes (and why they desist). Sociological Theory, 18, 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lalumière, M. L., Chalmers, L. J., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in the male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lalumière, M. L., Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Trautrimas, C. (2003). Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometric assessments? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 211–224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Landolt, M. A., Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Sex differences and intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: An evolutionary approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, L. T., McEvoy, B., Cape, E., Simms, K., & Bradley, D. G. (2005). A Y-chromosome signature of hegemony in Gaelic Ireland. American Journal of Human Genetics, 78, 334–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Orteiza, N., Linder, J. E., & Rice, W. R. (2005). Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 1315–1323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Packard, R. L., & Levenson, J. S. (2006). Revisiting the reliability of diagnostic decisions in sex offender civil commitment. Sexual Offender Treatment, 1(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Prentky, R. A., Coward, A. I., & Gabriel, A. M. (2008). Muddy diagnostic waters in the SVP courtroom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 36, 455–458.Google Scholar
  26. Provost, M. P., Kosakoski, G., Kormos, C., & Quinsey, V. L. (2006). Female sociosexuality and preference for male masculinization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 305–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Provost, M. P., Troje, N. F., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Short term mating strategies and attraction to masculinity in point-light walkers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quinsey, V. L. (2003). Etiology of anomalous sexual preferences in men. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 105–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1982). Penile responses to nonsexual violence among rapists. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1984). Stimulus control of rapists’ and non-sex offenders’ sexual arousal. Behavioral Assessment, 6, 169–176.Google Scholar
  31. Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Upfold, D. (1984). Sexual arousal to nonsexual violence and sadomasochistic themes among rapists and non-sex offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 651–657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Varney, G. W. (1981). A comparison of rapists’ and non-sex offenders’ sexual preferences for mutually consenting sex, rape, and physical abuse of women. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 127–135.Google Scholar
  33. Quinsey, V. L., Skilling, T. A., Lalumière, M. L., & Craig, W. (2004). Juvenile delinquency: Understanding individual differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice, W. R. (1996). Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381, 232–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rice, M. E., Chaplin, T. C., Harris, G. T., & Coutts, J. (1994). Empathy for the victim and sexual arousal among rapists and nonrapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Quinsey, V. L. (1990). A follow-up of rapists assessed in a maximum security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skilling, T. A., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). Identifying persistently antisocial offenders using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist and the DSM Antisocial Personality Disorder criteria. Psychological Assessment, 14, 27–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sykes, B. (2006). Saxons, Vikings, and Celts: The genetic roots of Britain and Ireland. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Volk, A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Human Nature, 13, 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wakefield, J. C. (1992). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review, 99, 232–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Walker, W. D. (1997). Patterns in sexual offending. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  43. Zander, T. K. (2008). Inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 36, 459–469.Google Scholar
  44. Zerjal, T., Xue, Y., Bertorelle, G., Wells, R. S., Bao, W., Zhu, S., et al. (2003). The genetic legacy of the Mongols. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 717–721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychiatric Association 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations