Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 79–85 | Cite as

Effect of Self-Reported Sexual Arousal on Responses to Sex-Related and Non-Sex-Related Disgust Cues

  • Richard J. StevensonEmail author
  • Trevor I. Case
  • Megan J. Oaten
Original Paper


Prior to and during sexual intercourse, people are exposed to stimuli that in other contexts might act as disgust-eliciting cues. This study examined whether sexual arousal, in contrast to general arousal, could selectively reduce reported disgust for cues that pilot participants identified as sex or non-sex related. Male undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of four viewing groups. One group viewed erotic female images, a second clad female images, a third pleasantly arousing images (e.g., skydiving), and a fourth unpleasantly arousing images (e.g., an aimed gun). After the viewing phase, all participants were exposed to pairs of real disgust elicitors (sex versus non-sex related) drawn from various sensory modalities. Participants in the erotic images group, who rated being more sexually aroused than those in the other three groups, also reported being significantly less disgusted by sex-related elicitors. While the mechanism for this effect is not currently known, our findings suggest one plausible explanation for risky sexual behavior as well as having implications for the role of disgust in sexual dysfunction.


Disgust Sexual arousal Disease avoidance 



The authors would like to thank the Australian Research Council for their financial support and Vince Polito, Jonathan McGuire, and Justin Wallace for assisting with this experiment.


  1. Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanton, H., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Effect of sexual motivation on men’s risk perception for sexually transmitted disease: There must be 50 ways to justify a lover. Health Psychology, 16, 374–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centres for Disease Control: Division of STD/HIV Prevention. (1990). Division of STD/HIV prevention annual report 1990. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  4. Curtis, V., & Biran, A. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44, 17–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davey, G. (1994). Disgust. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 135–143). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., Weijmar-Schultz, W., Peters, M. L., & Buwalda, F. M. (2009). Disgust and contamination sensitivity in vaginismus and dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 244–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gangestad, S. W. (2007). Reproductive strategies and tactics. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 321–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koukounas, E., & McCabe, M. (1997). Sexual and emotional variables influencing sexual response to erotica. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 221–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-5, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Low, B. S. (1990). Marriage systems and pathogen stress in human societies. American Zoologist, 30, 325–339.Google Scholar
  13. Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., McCauley, C., Dunlop, L., & Ashmore, M. (1999). Individual differences in disgust sensitivity: Comparisons and evaluations of paper-and-pencil versus behavioral measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 330–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 212–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Stevenson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Trevor I. Case
    • 1
  • Megan J. Oaten
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations