Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, 38:1044 | Cite as

Sex Therapy in a Cultural Context

  • Aleksandar Štulhofer
  • Goran Arbanas
Peer Commentary

Binik and Meana (2009) should be thanked for their controversial (provocative?) essay that prompted a number of colleagues (the authors of this comment included) to rethink some of the assumptions about sex therapy that are usually left unquestioned. In their essay, Binik and Meana eloquently argue that sex therapy never possessed a differentia specifica that would legitimate its claim to uniqueness and its distinctiveness from general psychotherapy. From there, Binik and Meana proceeded to advocate a quiet (and, presumably, self-inflicted) death of sex therapy, regarding it as a necessary sacrifice for a greater good—a unified, biopsychosocial approach to treating sexual health problems. Simply put, Binik and Meana assert that the existing sex (psycho)therapy blocks a more integrated and, therefore, a more efficient interdisciplinary enterprise.

We agree with Binik and Meana that there is very little that makes sex therapy a unique enterprise, particularly if this issue is approached...

Keywords

Sexual Health Sexual Dysfunction Sexual Problem Sexual Disorder Sexual Health Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Reference

  1. Binik, Y. M., & Meana, M. (2009). The future of sex therapy: Specialization or marginalization? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9475-9.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sexology Unit, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Day Care Center, Department of PsychiatryGeneral Hospital KarlovacKarlovacCroatia

Personalised recommendations