Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 458–459 | Cite as

Pornographic Actresses are a Poor Choice for Assessing What Men Optimally Prefer in Women’s Looks: Comments on Voracek and Fisher (2006)

  • Erik Holland
Letter To The Editor
  • 216 Downloads

Voracek and Fisher (2006) attempted a supposedly more ecologically valid assessment of men’s preferences for women’s physical attractiveness by analyzing reported anthropometric measurements of top-ranked female porn stars/nude models. This approach is problematic.

Voracek and Fisher assumed that the physical appearance of top-ranked porn stars/nude models reflects what men generally find most attractive in women. However, most women will not pose nude, let alone participate in pornography. Therefore, as a first approximation, highly ranked porn stars/nude models reflect the best looking among the minority of women who are willing to pose nude or indulge in pornographic acts, not the best looking women per se.

Voracek and Fisher noted substantial overrepresentation of women from the post-Soviet transitional countries of Eastern Europe in their sample, but did not address this observation. Is this because Eastern European women look better than other European women or is it that, for a...

Keywords

Breast Implant Attractiveness Evaluation Fashion Model Female Performer Eastern European Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cashdan, E. (1995). Hormones, sex, and status in women. Hormones and Behavior, 29, 354–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. James, W. P., & Francois, P. J. (1994). The choice of cut-off point for distinguishing normal body weights from underweight or ‘chronic energy deficiency’ in adults. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 48(Suppl. 3), S179–S184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Johnson, R. (2007, April). Walking a thin line. Vogue, pp. 380–385, 403.Google Scholar
  4. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Mikach, S. M., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1255–1266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Seifert, T. (2005). Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: Trends towards slender figures over time. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, 271–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Singh, D., & Randall, P. K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2007). Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 43–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Szabo, C. P. (1996). Playboy centrefolds and eating disorders—from male pleasure to female pathology? South African Medical Journal, 86, 838–839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tovee, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tovee, M. J., Mason, S. M., Emery, J. L., McCluskey, S. E., & Cohen-Tovee, E. M. (1997). Supermodels: Stick insects or hourglasses? Lancet, 350, 1474–1475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Voracek, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2002). Shapely centrefolds? Temporal change in body measures: Trend analysis. British Medical Journal, 325, 1447–1448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Voracek, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2006). Success is all in the measures: Androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 297–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TempeUSA

Personalised recommendations