Predictors and Consequences of Sexual “Hookups” Among College Students: A Short-term Prospective Study
- 4.1k Downloads
“Hookups,” sexual interactions between partners who do not expect a romantic commitment, are believed to be common among adolescents and young adults. Most existing research is cross-sectional and has not investigated the antecedents or consequences of hookups. To our knowledge, this study provides the first prospective investigation of the hypothesized predictors of penetrative sex hookups (i.e., oral, vaginal, and anal sex) and the first exploration of the short-term mental health consequences of hookups. A total of 140 first-semester college students (109 females, 31 males) completed an anonymous survey early in their first semester; the survey assessed 18 potential predictors of hooking up that were identified from theory and past research. At the end of their first semester, students again responded to a survey and provided data on their oral and vaginal sex hookup behavior (occurrence and number of partners), distress, and self-esteem. Baseline and follow-up data were linked using unique codes that protected participants’ anonymity. Pre-college hookup patterns, peak intoxication level, and situational triggers for hookups were consistent predictors of oral and vaginal sex hookup behavior (and number of hookup partners) in the first semester of college. Penetrative sex hookups increased psychological distress for females, but not for males. Implications for education and intervention as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.
KeywordsSexual behavior Hookup Casual sex Mental health Adolescents College students
We thank the students for their participation, Kate B. Carey, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this article, and Hillary L. Bishop for her assistance with data collection and data entry. Supported by Grant R01-MH54929 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Michael P. Carey and by a Graduate Research Grant from Psi Chi to Robyn L. Fielder.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (in press). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Google Scholar
- Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). The Self-Esteem scale. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Volume 1 of measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 121–123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Facebook: Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved August 1, 2007 from http://static.ak.facebook.com/press/facebook_statistics.pdf?12:51442&pwstdfy=95f3f0c257be3cfedb96b2df6269a271.
- Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2000). Sex on entertainment television. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 93–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent & Family Health, 3(3), 103–112.Google Scholar
- Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Messman-Moore, T. L., Ward, R. M., & Brown, A. L. (in press). Substance use and PTSD symptoms impact the likelihood of rape and revictimization in college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Google Scholar
- Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (in press). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior.Google Scholar
- Page, R. M., Hammermeister, J. J., & Scanlan, A. (2000). Everybody’s not doing it: Misperceptions of college students’ sexual activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24, 387–394.Google Scholar
- Paul, E. L. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In D. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Duck, & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Penhollow, T., Young, M., & Bailey, W. (2007). Relationship between religiosity and “hooking up” behavior. American Journal of Health Education, 38, 338–345.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Seaman, B. (2005). Binge: What your college student won’t tell you. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love, and lose at both. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1987). An evolutionary approach: Can Darwin’s view of life shed light on human sexuality? In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 91–126). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Tousigant, C. R. (2007, April 26). Summer lovin’: The rules of hooking up in the heat. The Daily Orange: (315) Life in Syracuse. Retrieved August 1, 2007 from http://media.www.dailyorange315.com/media/storage/paper1204/news/2007/04/26/Explicit/Summer.Lovin-2877810.shtml.
- Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In H. E. Howe & M. M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1979 (pp. 195–259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar