Ethnic Differences in Sexual Attitudes of U.S. College Students: Gender, Acculturation, and Religiosity Factors
Although it has been hypothesized that culture and religion play an important role in sexuality, the relative roles of acculturation and religiosity on ethnic differences in sexual attitudes have not been often empirically explored. The present study assessed differences in sexual attitudes in Euro-American, Asian, and Hispanic American populations using measures of acculturation to analyze the relative effects of heritage and mainstream cultures, as well as religiosity, within each ethnic group. A total of 1,415 college students (67% Euro-American, 16% Hispanic, 17% Asian; 32% men, 68% women) completed questionnaires which assessed attitudes towards homosexuality, gender role traditionality, casual sex, and extramarital sex. In concordance with previous studies, Asians reported more conservative sexual attitudes than did their Hispanic and Euro-American peers. Hispanics reported sexual attitudes similar to that of Euro-Americans. For both Hispanic and Asians, higher acculturation predicted sexual attitudes similar to that of Euro-Americans. For Asian, Hispanic, and Euro-American women, there was a significant interaction between intrinsic religiosity and spirituality such that the relationship between conservativism of sexual attitudes and intrinsic religiosity was stronger at higher levels of spirituality. In Euro-Americans and Asians, intrinsic religiosity and religious fundamentalism strongly predicted conservative sexual attitudes; while still significant, these relationships were not as pronounced in the Hispanic sample, implying an ethnic-by-religious effect. Novel to this study, acculturation did not mediate the relationship between religiosity and sexual attitudes, indicating that ethnic differences in religiosity effects were distinct from acculturation.
KeywordsEthnic differences Gender differences Acculturation Religiosity Sexuality Asian Hispanic Euro-American
The authors would like to acknowledge Ruth Andrew and Melissa Farmer for their help in the literature review and preparation of this article.
- Ahrold, T. K., Woo, J. S., Brotto, L. M., & Meston, C. M. (2007, August). Acculturation effects on sexual function: Does minority group visibility matter? Poster presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
- Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
- Amaro, H., Navarro, A., Conron, K., Raj, A., & On, C. (2002). Cultural influences on women’s sexual health. In R. J. DiClemente & G. M. Wingood (Eds.), Women’s sexual and reproductive health (pp. 71–92). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Bassett, R. L. (1999). Intrinsic religious motivation scale. In P. C. Hill & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Measures of religiosity (pp. 135–137). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
- Bassett, R. L., Smith, H. L., Newell, R. L., & Richards, A. H. (1999). Thou shalt not like sex: Taking another look at religiousness and sexual attitudes. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 18, 205–216.Google Scholar
- Beckwith, H. D., & Morrow, J. A. (2005). Sexual attitudes of college students: The impact of religiosity and spirituality. College Student Journal, 39, 357–367.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46, 5–34.Google Scholar
- Demerath, N. J. (2003). Crossing the Gods: World religions and worldly politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Derogatis, L. R. (1978). Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometrics Research.Google Scholar
- Farmer, M., Trapnell, P. D., & Meston, C. M. (2008). The relation between sexual behavior and religiosity subtypes: A test of the secularization hypothesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9407-0.
- Ramirez, M. I. (1984). Assessing and understanding biculturalism-multiculturalism in Mexican-American adults. In J. L. Martinez (Ed.), Chicano psychology (2nd ed., pp. 77–94). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Roosens, E. (1989). Creating ethnicity: The process of ethnogenesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau Population Division. (2007). Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/006808.html.
- Welwood, J. (2000). Toward a psychology of awakening: Buddhism, psychotherapy, and the path of personal and spiritual transformation. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
- Yang, F. (1999). Chinese Christians in America: Conversion, assimilation, and adhesive identities. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar