Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 393–399 | Cite as

New Evidence of Genetic Factors Influencing Sexual Orientation in Men: Female Fecundity Increase in the Maternal Line

Original Paper

Abstract

There is a long-standing debate on the role of genetic factors influencing homosexuality because the presence of these factors contradicts the Darwinian prediction according to which natural selection should progressively eliminate the factors that reduce individual fecundity and fitness. Recently, however, Camperio Ciani, Corna, and Capiluppi (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 2217–2221, 2004), comparing the family trees of homosexuals with heterosexuals, reported a significant increase in fecundity in the females related to the homosexual probands from the maternal line but not in those related from the paternal one. This suggested that genetic factors that are partly linked to the X-chromosome and that influence homosexual orientation in males are not selected against because they increase fecundity in female carriers, thus offering a solution to the Darwinian paradox and an explanation of why natural selection does not progressively eliminate homosexuals. Since then, new data have emerged suggesting not only an increase in maternal fecundity but also larger paternal family sizes for homosexuals. These results are partly conflicting and indicate the need for a replication on a wider sample with a larger geographic distribution. This study examined the family trees of 250 male probands, of which 152 were homosexuals. The results confirmed the study of Camperio Ciani et al. (2004). We observed a significant fecundity increase even in primiparous mothers, which was not evident in the previous study. No evidence of increased paternal fecundity was found; thus, our data confirmed a sexually antagonistic inheritance partly linked to the X-chromosome that promotes fecundity in females and a homosexual sexual orientation in males.

Keywords

Male homosexuality Fecundity Evolution Sexually antagonistic genetic model Birth order 

References

  1. Bailey, J. M., & Pillard, R. C. (1991). A genetic study of male sexual orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 1089–1096.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., Pillard, R. C., Dawood, K., Miller, M. B., Farrer, L. A., Tivedi, S., et al. (1999). A family history study of male sexual orientation using three independent samples. Behavior Genetics, 29, 79–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexuality: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (1997). Birth order and sibling sex ratio in homosexual versus heterosexual males and females. Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 27–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R. (2004). Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 173–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R., & Klassen, P. (1997). H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185, 373–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R., & Lippa, R. A. (2007). Birth order, sibling sex ratio, handedness, and sexual orientation of male and female participants in a BBC Internet research project. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 163–176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bobrow, D., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogaert, A. F. (2006). Biological versus nonbiological older brothers and men’s sexual orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 10771–10774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camperio Ciani, A., Cermelli, P., & Zanzotto, G. (2008). Sexually antagonistic selection in human male homosexuality. Plos One, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Camperio Ciani, A., Corna, F., & Capiluppi, C. (2004). Evidence for maternally inherited factors favouring male homosexuality and promoting female fecundity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 2217–2221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camperio Ciani, A., Iemmola, F., & Blecher, S. (2008). Bisexuals and not exclusive homosexuals show evidence of the same genetic factors that promote a female fecundity increase on the maternal line. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Camperio Ciani, A., Iemmola, F., & Lombardi, L. (2008). Male homosexuality partly correlates with an increased androphilia and fecundity in females from maternal line. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  14. Churchill, W. (1967). Homosexual behavior among males: A cross-cultural and cross-species investigation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. DuPree, M. G., Mustanski, B. S., Bocklandt, S., Nievergelt, C., & Hamer, D. H. (2004). A candidate gene study of CYP19 (aromatase) and male sexual orientation. Behavior Genetics, 34, 243–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S., Wachtmeister, C. A., & Lundqvist, D. (2002). An ethological theory of attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in visual cognition: Facial attractiveness (pp. 127–151). Westport, CT: Ablex Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gavrilets, S., & Rice, W. R. (2006). Genetic models of homosexuality: Generating testable predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 273, 3031–3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattattucci, A. M. (1993). A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. Science, 261, 321–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, S., Pattatucci, A. M., Patterson, C., Li, L., Fulker, D. W., Cherny, S. S., et al. (1995). Linkage between sexual orientation and chromosome Xq28 in males but not in females. Nature Genetics, 11, 248–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. King, M., Green, J., Osborn, D. P. J., Arkell, J., Hetherton, J., & Pereira, E. (2005). Family size in white gay and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 117–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
  22. Moran, P. A. P. (1972). Familial effects in schizophrenia and homosexuality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 116–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Muscarella, F. (2000). The evolution of homoerotic behavior in humans. Journal of Homosexuality, 40, 51–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mustansky, B. S., DuPree, M. G., Nievergelt, C. M., Bocklandt, S., Schork, N. J., & Hamer, D. H. (2005). A genomewide scan of male sexual orientation. Human Genetics, 116, 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman, Q., Collins, A., Morrison, M., Orrells, J. C., Cadinouche, K., Greenfield, S., et al. (2008). Maternal inheritance and familial fecundity factors in male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9191-2.
  26. Rahman, Q., & Hull, M. S. (2005). An empirical test of the kin selection hypothesis for male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 461–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rice, G., Anderson, C., Risch, N., & Ebers, G. (1999). Male homosexuality: Absence of linkage to microsatellite markers at Xq28. Science, 284, 665–667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Savolainen, V., & Lehmann, L. (2007). Genetics and bisexuality. Nature, 445, 158–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Spreen, M., & Marius, H. (1992). Rare populations, hidden populations and link-tracing designs: What and why? Bulletin Methodologie Sociologique, 6, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vasey, P. L. (1995). Homosexual behavior in primates: A review of evidence and theory. International Journal of Primatology, 16, 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vasey, P. L., Pocock, D., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2007). Kin selection and male androphilia in Samoan fa’afafine. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vasey, P. L., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2007). Birth order and male androphilia in Samoan fa’afafine. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1437–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watters, J. K., & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36, 416–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General Psychology (LIRIPAC)University of PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations